Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #452118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-16 08:33 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-03-16 08:51 -0700 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 08:33 -0700
Re: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-16 08:51 -0700
| From | bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 08:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter |
| Message-ID | <5db8d660-5e77-4573-b07c-42d9b93e4e74@googlegroups.com> |
On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 6:54:04 PM UTC-5, Winfield Hill wrote: > Anybody care to speculate about the most important aspects to consider when > trying to achieve 98% efficiency in a low-power (20mW) boost converter? Most > available step-up converter circuits seem to perform in the 85 to 90% region. > > I'm finishing a PCB "test bed" layout, which allows jumper-selection of > different inductors, synchronous switches, and adjustable controller parameters. > I'm hoping not to forget something important before sending it off to the PCB > house. Just for fun I thought I'd make it in the form of an Arduino shield; > giving an option for the processor to control the parameters and take > measurements. > > > -- > Thanks, > - Win Model and calculations need to be more thorough. This write-up seems to be a comprehensive analysis. I didn't read the whole thing: http://powerelectronics.com/site-files/powerelectronics.com/files/archive/powerelectronics.com/power_management/809PET-boost-converter-efficiency-calculations.pdf
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 08:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <oaecag05m0@drn.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #452118 |
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com wrote...
> Model and calculations need to be more thorough.
> This write-up seems to be a comprehensive analysis.
> I didn't read the whole thing:
>http://powerelectronics.com/site-files/powerelectronics.com/files/archive/powerelectronics.com/power_management/809PET-boost-converter-efficiency-calculations.pdf
Thanks, I hadn't seen that writeup, looks interesting.
You're right, I haven't given details of my 98% calcs
in my documents, because I'm concentrating on the PCB.
--
Thanks,
- Win
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web