Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #452118 > unrolled thread

Re: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter

Started bybloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com
First post2017-03-16 08:33 -0700
Last post2017-03-16 08:51 -0700
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 08:33 -0700
    Re: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-16 08:51 -0700

#452118 — Re: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter

Frombloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com
Date2017-03-16 08:33 -0700
SubjectRe: Achieving 98% efficiency in a boost converter
Message-ID<5db8d660-5e77-4573-b07c-42d9b93e4e74@googlegroups.com>
On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 6:54:04 PM UTC-5, Winfield Hill wrote:
> Anybody care to speculate about the most important aspects to consider when
> trying to achieve 98% efficiency in a low-power (20mW) boost converter?  Most
> available step-up converter circuits seem to perform in the 85 to 90% region.
> 
> I'm finishing a PCB "test bed" layout, which allows jumper-selection of
> different inductors, synchronous switches, and adjustable controller parameters.
> I'm hoping not to forget something important before sending it off to the PCB
> house.  Just for fun I thought I'd make it in the form of an Arduino shield;
> giving an option for the processor to control the parameters and take
> measurements.
> 
> 
> -- 
>  Thanks,
>     - Win

Model and calculations need to be more thorough. This write-up seems to be a comprehensive analysis. I didn't read the whole thing:
http://powerelectronics.com/site-files/powerelectronics.com/files/archive/powerelectronics.com/power_management/809PET-boost-converter-efficiency-calculations.pdf

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#452122

FromWinfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date2017-03-16 08:51 -0700
Message-ID<oaecag05m0@drn.newsguy.com>
In reply to#452118
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com wrote...
> Model and calculations need to be more thorough.
> This write-up seems to be a comprehensive analysis.
> I didn't read the whole thing:
>http://powerelectronics.com/site-files/powerelectronics.com/files/archive/powerelectronics.com/power_management/809PET-boost-converter-efficiency-calculations.pdf

 Thanks, I hadn't seen that writeup, looks interesting.
 You're right, I haven't given details of my 98% calcs
 in my documents, because I'm concentrating on the PCB.


-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design


csiph-web