Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #447619 > unrolled thread
| Started by | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-13 22:02 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-02-16 12:10 -0500 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
gumdrop source John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-13 22:02 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-14 04:15 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2017-02-14 13:43 +0100
Re: gumdrop source Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-02-14 09:57 -0600
Re: gumdrop source John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 08:11 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-18 10:14 +0000
Re: gumdrop source Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-18 09:57 +0000
Re: gumdrop source krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-18 10:18 -0500
Re: gumdrop source John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 08:01 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-14 08:06 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-13 18:20 -0500
Re: gumdrop source John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 09:07 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-18 10:18 +0000
Re: gumdrop source Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-17 22:50 -0500
Re: gumdrop source Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-18 09:43 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-18 13:13 -0500
Re: gumdrop source bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-14 08:44 -0500
Re: gumdrop source Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-15 13:19 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-16 03:54 +1100
Re: gumdrop source Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-15 13:31 -0800
Re: gumdrop source John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-15 13:46 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2017-02-15 23:04 +0100
Re: gumdrop source John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-02-16 05:16 +0000
Re: gumdrop source tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-15 14:45 -0800
Re: gumdrop source Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-15 19:59 -0800
Re: gumdrop source krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-16 12:10 -0500
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-15 13:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1ui9ac1vsnheuibka8jnfoj0oiok1kds6a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447790 |
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:31:14 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: >Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 22.19.04 UTC+1 skrev Robert Baer: >> John Larkin wrote: >> > >> > http://www.nexperia.com/ >> > >> > The web site is still a tad flakey. >> > >> > >> WTF is going on WRT cookies? >> Seems more and more sites are getting paranoid to the point of >> demanding a response to their "disclosure". >> Cookies have been around (read: used) for many YEARS. >> >> This cookie crap is becoming obscene. > >sites requiring you to accept cookies is a privacy protection EU law, >I believe they have now changed it so it is only required for cookies >that are not only for the site you are visiting Many web sites can't work without cookies. Requiring consent is silly. The Lympha plugin to Firefox deletes cookies. Some web pages will push 30 cookies in seconds. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-15 23:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <o82ja9$1mj8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #447792 |
On 15/02/17 22:46, John Larkin wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:31:14 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen > <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: > >> Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 22.19.04 UTC+1 skrev Robert Baer: >>> John Larkin wrote: >>>> >>>> http://www.nexperia.com/ >>>> >>>> The web site is still a tad flakey. >>>> >>>> >>> WTF is going on WRT cookies? >>> Seems more and more sites are getting paranoid to the point of >>> demanding a response to their "disclosure". >>> Cookies have been around (read: used) for many YEARS. >>> >>> This cookie crap is becoming obscene. >> >> sites requiring you to accept cookies is a privacy protection EU law, >> I believe they have now changed it so it is only required for cookies >> that are not only for the site you are visiting > > Many web sites can't work without cookies. Requiring consent is silly. > > The Lympha plugin to Firefox deletes cookies. Some web pages will push > 30 cookies in seconds. > > There used to be a setting to allow cookies to be sent only to the web sites that originated them. Whatever happened to that? That would put a stop to all those irritating advertisements that follow you around everywhere. Jeroen Belleman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-16 05:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <87fujeogu3.fsf@devereux.me.uk> |
| In reply to | #447794 |
Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> writes: > On 15/02/17 22:46, John Larkin wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:31:14 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: >> >>> Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 22.19.04 UTC+1 skrev Robert Baer: >>>> John Larkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nexperia.com/ >>>>> >>>>> The web site is still a tad flakey. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> WTF is going on WRT cookies? >>>> Seems more and more sites are getting paranoid to the point of >>>> demanding a response to their "disclosure". >>>> Cookies have been around (read: used) for many YEARS. >>>> >>>> This cookie crap is becoming obscene. >>> >>> sites requiring you to accept cookies is a privacy protection EU law, >>> I believe they have now changed it so it is only required for cookies >>> that are not only for the site you are visiting >> >> Many web sites can't work without cookies. Requiring consent is silly. >> >> The Lympha plugin to Firefox deletes cookies. Some web pages will push >> 30 cookies in seconds. >> >> > > There used to be a setting to allow cookies to be sent only > to the web sites that originated them. Whatever happened to > that? That would put a stop to all those irritating advertisements > that follow you around everywhere. > > Jeroen Belleman Firefox addons cookie controller + uBlock origin (no more ads) -- John Devereux
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tabbypurr@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-15 14:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <28e340a2-5c27-4a37-8ed2-1b8d457fef25@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #447792 |
On Wednesday, 15 February 2017 21:46:43 UTC, John Larkin wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:31:14 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen > <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: > >Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 22.19.04 UTC+1 skrev Robert Baer: > >> John Larkin wrote: > >> This cookie crap is becoming obscene. > > > >sites requiring you to accept cookies is a privacy protection EU law, > >I believe they have now changed it so it is only required for cookies > >that are not only for the site you are visiting > > Many web sites can't work without cookies. Requiring consent is silly. It's the law here. I'm not convinced it's achieved much in practice. NT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-15 19:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <Cs9pA.3063$X9.3000@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #447790 |
Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: > Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 22.19.04 UTC+1 skrev Robert Baer: >> John Larkin wrote: >>> >>> http://www.nexperia.com/ >>> >>> The web site is still a tad flakey. >>> >>> >> WTF is going on WRT cookies? >> Seems more and more sites are getting paranoid to the point of >> demanding a response to their "disclosure". >> Cookies have been around (read: used) for many YEARS. >> >> This cookie crap is becoming obscene. > > sites requiring you to accept cookies is a privacy protection EU law, > I believe they have now changed it so it is only required for cookies > that are not only for the site you are visiting Privacy protection" my ass..I claim they are VIOLATING _my_ privacy with their BS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-16 12:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s4nbactpiu4j9hvdvem12tcs5u8oqv058v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447827 |
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:59:32 -0800, Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote: >Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: >> Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 22.19.04 UTC+1 skrev Robert Baer: >>> John Larkin wrote: >>>> >>>> http://www.nexperia.com/ >>>> >>>> The web site is still a tad flakey. >>>> >>>> >>> WTF is going on WRT cookies? >>> Seems more and more sites are getting paranoid to the point of >>> demanding a response to their "disclosure". >>> Cookies have been around (read: used) for many YEARS. >>> >>> This cookie crap is becoming obscene. >> >> sites requiring you to accept cookies is a privacy protection EU law, >> I believe they have now changed it so it is only required for cookies >> that are not only for the site you are visiting > Privacy protection" my ass..I claim they are VIOLATING _my_ privacy >with their BS. Umm, perhaps you want to read that again. The "protection" part is warning you that you have no "privacy".
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web