Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #447309 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-11 13:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-02-12 17:21 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 23 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-11 13:22 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 12:44 -0800
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-11 13:44 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-02-11 23:06 +0100
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-11 15:08 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-12 06:41 -0800
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-02-12 18:33 +0100
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-12 10:34 -0800
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-02-12 19:55 +0100
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-11 21:45 -0800
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-12 08:46 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-12 08:38 -0800
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-10 22:59 -0500
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-12 09:48 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-10 23:12 -0500
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 09:13 -0800
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-12 10:36 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-02-12 11:54 -0600
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-12 11:25 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 10:54 -0800
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-02-12 18:01 -0600
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-12 17:16 -0700
Re: NPN Device Recommendation? krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-12 17:21 -0500
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-11 13:22 -0700 |
| Subject | NPN Device Recommendation? |
| Message-ID | <kdsu9c9jjhq2cbarrbqipmnkgi1dmv128u@4ax.com> |
I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
Recommendations?
Thanks!
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-11 12:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rrtu9chnk9un5ccua30bi2f2mn30vsn682@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447309 |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:22:23 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens >of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average >dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount. > >Recommendations? > >Thanks! > > ...Jim Thompson Lotta base current. Why not use a mosfet? -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-11 13:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6ttu9cdhaf14ho67ik1jdogb9lma0n4b7g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447309 |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:22:23 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
>of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
>dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
>
>Recommendations?
>
>Thanks!
>
> ...Jim Thompson
10V Max Vce
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-11 23:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <eg9g84F7mf8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #447312 |
Am 11.02.2017 um 21:44 schrieb Jim Thompson: >> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens >> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average >> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount. >> >> Recommendations? > 10V Max Vce FZT859TA & friends by Zetex, now Diodes,Inc. I currently use them as a cascode behind an array of IF3601/2. Like. regards, Gerhard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-11 15:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8p2v9chlo5bu4e9jp298hckkac73p2p31l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447318 |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:06:52 +0100, Gerhard Hoffmann
<ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> wrote:
>Am 11.02.2017 um 21:44 schrieb Jim Thompson:
>
>>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
>>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
>>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
>>>
>>> Recommendations?
>
>> 10V Max Vce
>
>FZT859TA & friends by Zetex, now Diodes,Inc.
>
>I currently use them as a cascode behind an array of IF3601/2.
>Like.
>
>regards, Gerhard
Thanks, Gerhard!
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 06:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o7ps7801gk4@drn.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #447318 |
Gerhard Hoffmann wrote...
>
> FZT859TA & friends by Zetex, now Diodes,Inc.
Was that FZT869 ? I'm a big fan of the Zetex
low R_CE(sat) transistors. I also like the
SOT-223 package, although I'm disappointed in
their commonly-poor thermal resistance specs.
The FZT851 is a good pulsing NPN, rated at 20A.
>
>I currently use them as a cascode behind an array of IF3601/2.
>Like.
>
>regards, Gerhard
>
--
Thanks,
- Win
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 18:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <egbkijFkj9jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #447404 |
Am 12.02.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Winfield Hill: > Gerhard Hoffmann wrote... >> >> FZT859TA & friends by Zetex, now Diodes,Inc. > > Was that FZT869 ? I'm a big fan of the Zetex Oh, yes! And I even opened the Altium Designer in a Windows virtual machine to be sure... Probably serious depletion of coffee. > low R_CE(sat) transistors. I also like the > SOT-223 package, although I'm disappointed in > their commonly-poor thermal resistance specs. I prefer SOT-89, for size, power and RF reasons. The lead frame of the sot-223 is really thin because they have to bend it 4 times and the contact area to the board is not under the chip, but as far outside as possible. >> regards, Gerhard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 10:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o7q9s402i79@drn.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #447427 |
Gerhard Hoffmann wrote...
>
> I prefer SOT-89, for size, power and RF reasons.
Yes, right, much better. But not many dies
one wants to use come in that package.
--
Thanks,
- Win
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 19:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <egbpcgFljgmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #447437 |
Am 12.02.2017 um 19:34 schrieb Winfield Hill: > Gerhard Hoffmann wrote... >> >> I prefer SOT-89, for size, power and RF reasons. > > Yes, right, much better. But not many dies > one wants to use come in that package. > > It looks like Infineon are phasing out Sot-223. My BFG196 transistors are gone. But there are some new ones in sot-89 for GHz medium power, including at least one that has the emitter on the middle tab, not the collector. Ideal for CE RF stages, no parasitics from cooling. Just a moment, < http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-BFQ790-DS-v02_00-EN.pdf?fileId=5546d4624cb7f111014d237c2a8f54fc > Cheers, Gerhard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-11 21:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <nESnA.2111$X9.1828@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #447309 |
Jim Thompson wrote:
> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
>
> Recommendations?
>
> Thanks!
>
> ...Jim Thompson
EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 08:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qq01acdf3mjd279ipnjorr59abri120fgf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447377 |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:45:55 -0800, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:
>Jim Thompson wrote:
>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
>>
>> Recommendations?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
> EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version.
10A PEAK ??
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 08:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o7q31l0239g@drn.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #447409 |
Jim Thompson wrote...
>
>On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:45:55 -0800, Robert Baer
><robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:
>
>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
>>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
>>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
>>>
>>> Recommendations?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> ...Jim Thompson
>> EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version.
>
>10A PEAK ??
Nahh.
--
Thanks,
- Win
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-10 22:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iNCdnbzJ8vzqDD3FnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #447418 |
On 02/12/2017 11:38 AM, Winfield Hill wrote: > Jim Thompson wrote... >> >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:45:55 -0800, Robert Baer >> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote: >> >>> Jim Thompson wrote: >>>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens >>>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average >>>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount. >>>> >>>> Recommendations? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> ...Jim Thompson >>> EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version. >> >> 10A PEAK ?? > > Nahh. > > The specs don't make sense. A few tens of microseconds at 1 ms intervals is a duty cycle of a few percent. At 10 A you're going to be dissipating a few watts, so your average power is going to be a lot bigger than 150 uW. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 160 North State Road #203 Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gd41acd1da2q25nrngr1gedrjo9ippa9he@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447419 |
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:59:48 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>On 02/12/2017 11:38 AM, Winfield Hill wrote:
>> Jim Thompson wrote...
>>>
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:45:55 -0800, Robert Baer
>>> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
>>>>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
>>>>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
>>>>>
>>>>> Recommendations?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>>> EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version.
>>>
>>> 10A PEAK ??
>>
>> Nahh.
>>
>>
>
>The specs don't make sense. A few tens of microseconds at 1 ms
>intervals is a duty cycle of a few percent. At 10 A you're going to be
>dissipating a few watts, so your average power is going to be a lot
>bigger than 150 uW.
>
>Cheers
>
>Phil Hobbs
Naaah! Dumping a small capacitor, starting from 4.2V
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-10 23:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o7q46i$oig$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #447420 |
On 02/12/2017 11:48 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:59:48 -0500, Phil Hobbs > <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: > >> On 02/12/2017 11:38 AM, Winfield Hill wrote: >>> Jim Thompson wrote... >>>> >>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:45:55 -0800, Robert Baer >>>> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens >>>>>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average >>>>>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount. >>>>>> >>>>>> Recommendations? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> ...Jim Thompson >>>>> EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version. >>>> >>>> 10A PEAK ?? >>> >>> Nahh. >>> >>> >> >> The specs don't make sense. A few tens of microseconds at 1 ms >> intervals is a duty cycle of a few percent. At 10 A you're going to be >> dissipating a few watts, so your average power is going to be a lot >> bigger than 150 uW. >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil Hobbs > > Naaah! Dumping a small capacitor, starting from 4.2V > > ...Jim Thompson > Okay, so you're vastly overestimating the pulse width. Since you don't seem to care very much about that, why do you need such a high peak current? Your 150 nJ at 4.2V comes out to 1.7 nF, which would discharge in 1 us with only 7 mA. Getting up to 10 A would a pulse width of 700 ps. Kind of unlikely. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 160 North State Road #203 Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 09:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6m51ac1d5fvdnhdrgokm4ful3asbvbmspl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447421 |
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:12:43 -0500, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >On 02/12/2017 11:48 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:59:48 -0500, Phil Hobbs >> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote: >> >>> On 02/12/2017 11:38 AM, Winfield Hill wrote: >>>> Jim Thompson wrote... >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:45:55 -0800, Robert Baer >>>>> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jim Thompson wrote: >>>>>>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens >>>>>>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average >>>>>>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Recommendations? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson >>>>>> EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version. >>>>> >>>>> 10A PEAK ?? >>>> >>>> Nahh. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The specs don't make sense. A few tens of microseconds at 1 ms >>> intervals is a duty cycle of a few percent. At 10 A you're going to be >>> dissipating a few watts, so your average power is going to be a lot >>> bigger than 150 uW. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Phil Hobbs >> >> Naaah! Dumping a small capacitor, starting from 4.2V >> >> ...Jim Thompson >> > > >Okay, so you're vastly overestimating the pulse width. Since you don't >seem to care very much about that, why do you need such a high peak >current? Your 150 nJ at 4.2V comes out to 1.7 nF, which would discharge >in 1 us with only 7 mA. > >Getting up to 10 A would a pulse width of 700 ps. Kind of unlikely. > >Cheers > > >Phil Hobbs A little bitty 3-cent mosfet would discharge that cap just fine. If recharge linearity matters, a phemt would have much lower drain capacitance change vs voltage. There are tricks for making and resetting fast linear ramps, but helping Jim doesn't seem to be a sensible activity. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <q771ac9afinbimpknv55vcrj5gep5gca4r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447421 |
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:12:43 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>On 02/12/2017 11:48 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:59:48 -0500, Phil Hobbs
>> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/12/2017 11:38 AM, Winfield Hill wrote:
>>>> Jim Thompson wrote...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:45:55 -0800, Robert Baer
>>>>> <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>>>>> I need a discrete NPN, non-Darlington, capable of handling a few tens
>>>>>>> of microseconds at 10A repetitive at 1ms intervals, average
>>>>>>> dissipation will be around 150uW, surface mount.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recommendations?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...Jim Thompson
>>>>>> EVERYBODY loves the 2N2222 foe everything, so...find a SMT version.
>>>>>
>>>>> 10A PEAK ??
>>>>
>>>> Nahh.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The specs don't make sense. A few tens of microseconds at 1 ms
>>> intervals is a duty cycle of a few percent. At 10 A you're going to be
>>> dissipating a few watts, so your average power is going to be a lot
>>> bigger than 150 uW.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Phil Hobbs
>>
>> Naaah! Dumping a small capacitor, starting from 4.2V
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>>
>
>
>Okay, so you're vastly overestimating the pulse width. Since you don't
>seem to care very much about that, why do you need such a high peak
>current? Your 150 nJ at 4.2V comes out to 1.7 nF, which would discharge
>in 1 us with only 7 mA.
>
>Getting up to 10 A would a pulse width of 700 ps. Kind of unlikely.
>
>Cheers
>
>
>Phil Hobbs
Not unlikely. Can't say much. Customer.
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 11:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o7q7bp$4r0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #447421 |
"Phil Hobbs" <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in message news:o7q46i$oig$1@dont-email.me... > Okay, so you're vastly overestimating the pulse width. Since you don't > seem to care very much about that, why do you need such a high peak > current? Your 150 nJ at 4.2V comes out to 1.7 nF, which would discharge > in 1 us with only 7 mA. > > Getting up to 10 A would a pulse width of 700 ps. Kind of unlikely. Not to mention the < 0.42 ohm impedance, demanding a loop inductance under 0.3nH. This isn't monolithic, Jim ;-) Tim -- Seven Transistor Labs, LLC Electrical Engineering Consultation and Contract Design Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 11:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <84a1ac5kjju2si6em84lmr0qjc4eq4ech3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447431 |
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:54:02 -0600, "Tim Williams"
<tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> wrote:
>"Phil Hobbs" <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in message
>news:o7q46i$oig$1@dont-email.me...
>> Okay, so you're vastly overestimating the pulse width. Since you don't
>> seem to care very much about that, why do you need such a high peak
>> current? Your 150 nJ at 4.2V comes out to 1.7 nF, which would discharge
>> in 1 us with only 7 mA.
>>
>> Getting up to 10 A would a pulse width of 700 ps. Kind of unlikely.
>
>Not to mention the < 0.42 ohm impedance, demanding a loop inductance under
>0.3nH.
>
>This isn't monolithic, Jim ;-)
>
>Tim
Isn't the whole world monolithic ?>:-}
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-12 10:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5qb1ac14e7tp0ceufa7d30cqp9jacgh2ej@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #447436 |
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:25:33 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:54:02 -0600, "Tim Williams" ><tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> wrote: > >>"Phil Hobbs" <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in message >>news:o7q46i$oig$1@dont-email.me... >>> Okay, so you're vastly overestimating the pulse width. Since you don't >>> seem to care very much about that, why do you need such a high peak >>> current? Your 150 nJ at 4.2V comes out to 1.7 nF, which would discharge >>> in 1 us with only 7 mA. >>> >>> Getting up to 10 A would a pulse width of 700 ps. Kind of unlikely. >> >>Not to mention the < 0.42 ohm impedance, demanding a loop inductance under >>0.3nH. >> >>This isn't monolithic, Jim ;-) >> >>Tim > >Isn't the whole world monolithic ?>:-} > > ...Jim Thompson And encrypted. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web