Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #450327 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-05 11:31 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-03-07 11:19 -0800 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 28 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-05 11:31 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Adrian Jansen <adrian@qq.vv.net> - 2017-03-06 07:46 +1000
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-05 14:43 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Adrian Jansen <adrian@qq.vv.net> - 2017-03-06 11:23 +1000
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-06 07:48 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (Dave Platt) - 2017-03-06 11:41 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-06 12:04 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-05 14:52 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-05 15:43 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-05 16:15 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-06 07:49 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? "dcaster@krl.org" <dcaster@krl.org> - 2017-03-05 17:10 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2017-03-06 06:14 -0600
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? makolber@yahoo.com - 2017-03-06 07:18 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-06 07:53 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? jurb6006@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 16:26 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-05 16:42 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? jurb6006@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 20:41 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-03-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-06 08:02 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-06 10:19 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> - 2017-03-06 02:12 +0000
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-06 08:06 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> - 2017-03-07 00:56 +0000
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-07 07:32 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? makolber@yahoo.com - 2017-03-07 10:57 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? makolber@yahoo.com - 2017-03-07 10:59 -0800
Re: Slightly OT: Wine fridge temperature hysteresis? Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-07 11:19 -0800
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-06 10:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ei5ni7Fam5oU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450459 |
On 2017-03-06 08:02, Joerg wrote: > On 2017-03-05 16:53, Jim Thompson wrote: >> On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 11:31:41 -0800, Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> >> wrote: >> >>> What is normal for a temperature hysteresis (or "dead band") in a wine >>> fridge? I am seeing 5F and more. It is a Vinotemp VT182. >> >> Our KitchenAid wine refrigerator has ~4°F hysteresis... very annoying >> for an engineer to watch >:-} But doesn't seem to hurt the wine at >> all. >> > > Ah, so then 5F would be almost normal in the market. I wonder why they > do that. > > I'll see what the fermentation process says to that. If not happy I'll > build my own controller. It's already on the schematic, just a lot of > soldering. This would also allow me to strap a LM35-based sensor pod > directly to a fermenter. > > [...] > BTW, I don't know much about wine but with beer there are a few types such as Pilsener and some Belgian ales where a difference of 5F can definitely matter. It can be the difference between ideal drinking temperature and too cold where yuo'd lose som flavors. Anyhow, another project just reared its ugly head. The main pool pump goes TUNGGGG or sometimes just "tick" when it is supposed to come on but the motor won't turn. Shaft spins though. And it's raining, of course. Oh man ... Since the sweep pump operates via timer that one might already have committed suicide because its design is suboptimal in that it can't run dry for long :-( -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-06 02:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o9igi9$pkp$1@news2.open-news-network.org> |
| In reply to | #450327 |
On 05/03/2017 19:31, Joerg wrote: > What is normal for a temperature hysteresis (or "dead band") in a wine > fridge? I am seeing 5F and more. It is a Vinotemp VT182. Most older fridges I have come across have the capillary bulb or sensor next to the cooling radiator, such that any hysteresis was reduced. > Long story short I modified it to become a beer fermenting chamber and > added heating capability. Due to it being winter out here it is operated > in heat mode right now and the original controller is still used to > measure and regulate temps. I didn't hack the micro controller part of > it (yet ...). Currently it is set to 65F. Heat came on at 63F or 64F > and now it's topped out at 69F, still heating. Since the heater is wimpy > that means it may be always on until it gets warmer outside. No problem, > just got me to wonder why the hysteresis is so large on these. Not so long ago our central heating (bimetal) thermostats would have a resistor that would heat the bimetal strip when the thermostat demanded heat. That, in a crude way, reduced the hysteresis. Look for accelerator in: http://www.flameport.com/electric/central_heating/room_thermostat.cs4 -- Mike Perkins Video Solutions Ltd www.videosolutions.ltd.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-06 08:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ei5fniF91oiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450380 |
On 2017-03-05 18:12, Mike Perkins wrote: > On 05/03/2017 19:31, Joerg wrote: >> What is normal for a temperature hysteresis (or "dead band") in a wine >> fridge? I am seeing 5F and more. It is a Vinotemp VT182. > > Most older fridges I have come across have the capillary bulb or sensor > next to the cooling radiator, such that any hysteresis was reduced. > This one is electronic. The sensor does sit next to the cooling exchanger but the uC in the electronic sets the hysteresis. >> Long story short I modified it to become a beer fermenting chamber and >> added heating capability. Due to it being winter out here it is operated >> in heat mode right now and the original controller is still used to >> measure and regulate temps. I didn't hack the micro controller part of >> it (yet ...). Currently it is set to 65F. Heat came on at 63F or 64F >> and now it's topped out at 69F, still heating. Since the heater is wimpy >> that means it may be always on until it gets warmer outside. No problem, >> just got me to wonder why the hysteresis is so large on these. > > Not so long ago our central heating (bimetal) thermostats would have a > resistor that would heat the bimetal strip when the thermostat demanded > heat. That, in a crude way, reduced the hysteresis. > > Look for accelerator in: > http://www.flameport.com/electric/central_heating/room_thermostat.cs4 > Crude but it works. With electronics this is no longer necessary though. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o9l0g1$4fg$1@news2.open-news-network.org> |
| In reply to | #450460 |
On 06/03/2017 16:06, Joerg wrote: > On 2017-03-05 18:12, Mike Perkins wrote: >> On 05/03/2017 19:31, Joerg wrote: >>> What is normal for a temperature hysteresis (or "dead band") in a wine >>> fridge? I am seeing 5F and more. It is a Vinotemp VT182. >> >> Most older fridges I have come across have the capillary bulb or sensor >> next to the cooling radiator, such that any hysteresis was reduced. >> > > This one is electronic. The sensor does sit next to the cooling > exchanger but the uC in the electronic sets the hysteresis. The hysteresis might have been set to take into account the nature of the cooling radiator in much the same way the mechanics of the bimetal sensor set the hysteresis. My point is that the hysteresis was in part negated by the position of the sensor, which as you say is next to the heat exchanger. >>> Long story short I modified it to become a beer fermenting chamber and >>> added heating capability. Due to it being winter out here it is operated >>> in heat mode right now and the original controller is still used to >>> measure and regulate temps. I didn't hack the micro controller part of >>> it (yet ...). Currently it is set to 65F. Heat came on at 63F or 64F >>> and now it's topped out at 69F, still heating. Since the heater is wimpy >>> that means it may be always on until it gets warmer outside. No problem, >>> just got me to wonder why the hysteresis is so large on these. >> >> Not so long ago our central heating (bimetal) thermostats would have a >> resistor that would heat the bimetal strip when the thermostat demanded >> heat. That, in a crude way, reduced the hysteresis. >> >> Look for accelerator in: >> http://www.flameport.com/electric/central_heating/room_thermostat.cs4 >> > > Crude but it works. With electronics this is no longer necessary though. Sorry, but hysteresis is hysteresis, whether through a mechanical switch or electronic means. I accept if you have access to the code then obviously you can make an equivalent of an 'accelerator heater' and save a component. -- Mike Perkins Video Solutions Ltd www.videosolutions.ltd.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 07:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ei823hFollkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450542 |
On 2017-03-06 16:56, Mike Perkins wrote: > On 06/03/2017 16:06, Joerg wrote: >> On 2017-03-05 18:12, Mike Perkins wrote: >>> On 05/03/2017 19:31, Joerg wrote: >>>> What is normal for a temperature hysteresis (or "dead band") in a wine >>>> fridge? I am seeing 5F and more. It is a Vinotemp VT182. >>> >>> Most older fridges I have come across have the capillary bulb or sensor >>> next to the cooling radiator, such that any hysteresis was reduced. >>> >> >> This one is electronic. The sensor does sit next to the cooling >> exchanger but the uC in the electronic sets the hysteresis. > > The hysteresis might have been set to take into account the nature of > the cooling radiator in much the same way the mechanics of the bimetal > sensor set the hysteresis. > > My point is that the hysteresis was in part negated by the position of > the sensor, which as you say is next to the heat exchanger. > However, the hysteresis was still huge when I test ran it in cooling mode and the cycle times were very long. It just does not make sense. >>>> Long story short I modified it to become a beer fermenting chamber and >>>> added heating capability. Due to it being winter out here it is >>>> operated >>>> in heat mode right now and the original controller is still used to >>>> measure and regulate temps. I didn't hack the micro controller part of >>>> it (yet ...). Currently it is set to 65F. Heat came on at 63F or 64F >>>> and now it's topped out at 69F, still heating. Since the heater is >>>> wimpy >>>> that means it may be always on until it gets warmer outside. No >>>> problem, >>>> just got me to wonder why the hysteresis is so large on these. >>> >>> Not so long ago our central heating (bimetal) thermostats would have a >>> resistor that would heat the bimetal strip when the thermostat demanded >>> heat. That, in a crude way, reduced the hysteresis. >>> >>> Look for accelerator in: >>> http://www.flameport.com/electric/central_heating/room_thermostat.cs4 >>> >> >> Crude but it works. With electronics this is no longer necessary though. > > Sorry, but hysteresis is hysteresis, whether through a mechanical switch > or electronic means. I accept if you have access to the code then > obviously you can make an equivalent of an 'accelerator heater' and save > a component. > Well, for the heating situation I'd have to make an "accelerator cooler" and that is no small feat. Would require a peltier which dissipates to some other farther away part in the fridge. Plus power. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | makolber@yahoo.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 10:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dcdf9420-8793-478c-9411-ca96c3790397@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450624 |
> > Well, for the heating situation I'd have to make an "accelerator cooler" > and that is no small feat. Would require a peltier which dissipates to > some other farther away part in the fridge. Plus power. > > no, you just set up the small heater next to the sensor such that the heater is ON when the cooler is OFF. You can then easily adjust the system hysteresis. Also the term used is "anticipator" mark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | makolber@yahoo.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 10:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4a9575e9-97ae-4a80-99c6-eb074c1891d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450658 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 1:58:01 PM UTC-5, mako...@yahoo.com wrote: > > > > Well, for the heating situation I'd have to make an "accelerator cooler" > > and that is no small feat. Would require a peltier which dissipates to > > some other farther away part in the fridge. Plus power. > > > > > > no, you just set up the small heater next to the sensor such that the heater is ON when the cooler is OFF. > which is simply a small resistor ACROSS the contacts > You can then easily adjust the system hysteresis. > > Also the term used is "anticipator" > > mark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 11:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ei8fe0FreljU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450659 |
On 2017-03-07 10:59, makolber@yahoo.com wrote: > On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 1:58:01 PM UTC-5, mako...@yahoo.com wrote: >>> >>> Well, for the heating situation I'd have to make an "accelerator cooler" >>> and that is no small feat. Would require a peltier which dissipates to >>> some other farther away part in the fridge. Plus power. >>> >>> >> >> no, you just set up the small heater next to the sensor such that the heater is ON when the cooler is OFF. >> > > which is simply a small resistor ACROSS the contacts > >> You can then easily adjust the system hysteresis. >> >> Also the term used is "anticipator" >> >> mark > There are no contacts here, it's all electronic. I could place a small heater resistor near the sensor. Except then the temperature display will be off but I could probably arrive at a cheat sheet for that. More cables though. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web