Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #447530 > unrolled thread

Long term stability of matched resistors?

Started by"Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
First post2017-02-13 09:33 +0000
Last post2017-02-16 08:19 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 34 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design


Contents

  Long term stability of matched resistors? "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2017-02-13 09:33 +0000
    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 03:10 -0800
      Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2017-02-13 15:27 +0000
    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Chris Jones <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> - 2017-02-14 00:02 +1100
    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Steve Goldstein <sgoldHAM@alum.mit.edu> - 2017-02-13 08:30 -0500
    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2017-02-13 08:55 -0500
    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-13 08:43 -0800
      Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2017-02-13 17:22 +0000
        Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-13 10:23 -0800
        Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2017-02-14 20:02 +0100
          Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 11:16 -0800
            Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2017-02-14 22:45 +0100
              Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 14:52 -0800
                Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-14 15:13 -0800
                  Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-14 16:35 -0800
                    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-14 16:47 -0800
                      Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-14 17:29 -0800
                        Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-14 17:45 -0800
                          Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-14 18:17 -0800
                          Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 18:37 -0800
                Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2017-02-15 09:48 +0100
                  Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-15 07:12 -0800
                    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 20:15 -0800
                    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-15 20:28 -0800
                      Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-16 06:32 -0800
                        Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-16 09:56 -0800
                          Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-16 11:08 -0800
                          Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-16 18:10 -0800
                    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? jack4747@gmail.com - 2017-02-16 02:19 -0800
                      Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-18 09:50 +0000
    Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2017-02-16 09:26 +0000
      Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? jack4747@gmail.com - 2017-02-16 02:22 -0800
        Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2017-02-16 16:04 +0000
          Re: Long term stability of matched resistors? jack4747@gmail.com - 2017-02-16 08:19 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →


#447530 — Long term stability of matched resistors?

From"Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date2017-02-13 09:33 +0000
SubjectLong term stability of matched resistors?
Message-ID<egdcr2Fud17U3@mid.individual.net>
If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
to 0.1% can I expect that the matching keeps stable for a longer time
or will the values drift sooner or later to their 1% tolerance?
In other words: Do I need resistors with 0.1% initial tolerance for
long term 0.1% matching?

-- 
Dipl.-Inform(FH) Peter Heitzer, peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#447534

FromPhil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-13 03:10 -0800
Message-ID<3adca520-6873-4f05-8b55-b820d6d5fdc2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#447530
Peter Heitzer wrote:
>
>
> If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
> to 0.1% 
>

** Hang on a mo,

"metal foil" resistors are typically 0.01% tolerance or better.

Maybe you mean "metal film".




....  Phil 
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447550

From"Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date2017-02-13 15:27 +0000
Message-ID<ege1jkF45k9U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#447534
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:
>Peter Heitzer wrote:
>>
>>
>> If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
>> to 0.1% 
>>

>** Hang on a mo,

>"metal foil" resistors are typically 0.01% tolerance or better.

>Maybe you mean "metal film".

Yes, of course. I fear my technical english vocabulary is rather unsufficient.


-- 
Dipl.-Inform(FH) Peter Heitzer, peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447539

FromChris Jones <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com>
Date2017-02-14 00:02 +1100
Message-ID<58ioA.748171$A_3.718007@fx37.am4>
In reply to#447530
On 13/02/2017 20:33, Peter Heitzer wrote:
> If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
> to 0.1% can I expect that the matching keeps stable for a longer time
> or will the values drift sooner or later to their 1% tolerance?
> In other words: Do I need resistors with 0.1% initial tolerance for
> long term 0.1% matching?
>

Even if you buy 0.1% resistors, that does not mean that they will stay 
within 0.1% forever, nor that they will always stay matched even to the 
initially guaranteed 0.2%.

Some resistors have stability specifications, but these are usually so 
loose as to be fairly useless, except for extremely expensive resistors.

Vishay seems to have bought almost all of the precision resistor 
companies. If you want a second source it is getting difficult.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447540

FromSteve Goldstein <sgoldHAM@alum.mit.edu>
Date2017-02-13 08:30 -0500
Message-ID<avc3acd8ho4k6rj9n3v498ke5a7oo2s725@4ax.com>
In reply to#447530
On 13 Feb 2017 09:33:22 GMT, "Peter Heitzer"
<peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

>If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
>to 0.1% can I expect that the matching keeps stable for a longer time
>or will the values drift sooner or later to their 1% tolerance?
>In other words: Do I need resistors with 0.1% initial tolerance for
>long term 0.1% matching?

If the resistors are selected from the same manufacturing lot, are
used well below their specified voltage/power/temperature ratings
under similar operating conditions they should match fairly well. It's
hard to guarantee, though, absent manufacturer matching specs.

If the application is really critical and is a one-off, so presumably
less cost-sensitive,  you may be best off buying a matched pair in a
package.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447543

FromSpehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat>
Date2017-02-13 08:55 -0500
Message-ID<tce3acd8l9r6qih7e7bcrcak6vnp5ud6dp@4ax.com>
In reply to#447530
On 13 Feb 2017 09:33:22 GMT, the renowned "Peter Heitzer"
<peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

>If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
>to 0.1% can I expect that the matching keeps stable for a longer time
>or will the values drift sooner or later to their 1% tolerance?
>In other words: Do I need resistors with 0.1% initial tolerance for
>long term 0.1% matching?

Read the data sheet about drift, load life and so on. It's not just a
simple tolerance specification. The tolerance refers (usually) to
initial tolerance at a reference temperature (eg. 25°C) and before
soldering, aging etc. 

Generally, chances are excellent that resistors of similar or equal
resistance value from similar lots will match well over time, but
there are no guarantees, especially if the environment or service (eg.
pulses, large DC bias) is not benign. 

Since looser tolerance resistors may be made with inferior materials
or construction, they may tend to deviate more over time or
temperature etc. Or not. 

--sp 


-- 
Best regards, 
Spehro Pefhany

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447566

FromJohn Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com>
Date2017-02-13 08:43 -0800
Message-ID<g9o3ac5kivd8rbb4kn22elap9m4cgsb6pi@4ax.com>
In reply to#447530
On 13 Feb 2017 09:33:22 GMT, "Peter Heitzer"
<peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

>If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
>to 0.1% can I expect that the matching keeps stable for a longer time
>or will the values drift sooner or later to their 1% tolerance?
>In other words: Do I need resistors with 0.1% initial tolerance for
>long term 0.1% matching?

We've been impressed with the long-term stability of the Susumo
surface-mount thinfilm resistors. Some of our products that depend on
them are showing drifts of low tens of PPMs per year, with lots of
other things contributing.

What specific resistor types did you have in mind?


-- 

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447570

From"Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date2017-02-13 17:22 +0000
Message-ID<ege8a2F5m3fU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#447566
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>On 13 Feb 2017 09:33:22 GMT, "Peter Heitzer"
><peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

>>If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
>>to 0.1% can I expect that the matching keeps stable for a longer time
>>or will the values drift sooner or later to their 1% tolerance?
>>In other words: Do I need resistors with 0.1% initial tolerance for
>>long term 0.1% matching?

>We've been impressed with the long-term stability of the Susumo
>surface-mount thinfilm resistors. Some of our products that depend on
>them are showing drifts of low tens of PPMs per year, with lots of
>other things contributing.

>What specific resistor types did you have in mind?

Just ordinary metal film types like vishay CCF55 
(http://www.vishay.com/docs/31015/ccf55.pdf)
or thick film chip resistors with tempco of 100 ppm.
I do not develop products, I use them only in hobby projects.

-- 
Dipl.-Inform(FH) Peter Heitzer, peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447574

FromJohn Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com>
Date2017-02-13 10:23 -0800
Message-ID<38u3acpoeq1d8qr5n4rnfudbsmm38gmqqv@4ax.com>
In reply to#447570
On 13 Feb 2017 17:22:10 GMT, "Peter Heitzer"
<peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

>John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>>On 13 Feb 2017 09:33:22 GMT, "Peter Heitzer"
>><peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>
>>>If I select metal foil resistors with 1% tolerance so that they match
>>>to 0.1% can I expect that the matching keeps stable for a longer time
>>>or will the values drift sooner or later to their 1% tolerance?
>>>In other words: Do I need resistors with 0.1% initial tolerance for
>>>long term 0.1% matching?
>
>>We've been impressed with the long-term stability of the Susumo
>>surface-mount thinfilm resistors. Some of our products that depend on
>>them are showing drifts of low tens of PPMs per year, with lots of
>>other things contributing.
>
>>What specific resistor types did you have in mind?
>
>Just ordinary metal film types like vishay CCF55 
>(http://www.vishay.com/docs/31015/ccf55.pdf)
>or thick film chip resistors with tempco of 100 ppm.
>I do not develop products, I use them only in hobby projects.

Looks like the temperature coefficient will be a bigger error than
ageing.

The Susumu's typically have tempcos in the single digits of PPMs. Here
in the USA, we can get them inexpensively from Mouser or Digikey.


-- 

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing   precision measurement 

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447654

FromMarte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de>
Date2017-02-14 20:02 +0100
Message-ID<o7vk83$ps7$1@news2.open-news-network.org>
In reply to#447570
Hi Peter,

> Just ordinary metal film types like vishay CCF55
> (http://www.vishay.com/docs/31015/ccf55.pdf)

schau mal auf Seite 2 im eben zitierten Datenblatt unter Performance. Da 
stehts:
Je nach Umgebungseinfluß darf sich der Widerstandswert signifikant 
(Jeweils um 0,5%) verändern

In der Praxis werden abgeglichene Widerstände fast immer nah beieinander 
montiert (alleine schon wegen der thermischen Drift), da sollte dann 
auch bei beiden Widerständen ähnliches passieren. Aber wenn man sich 
darauf verlassen soll, dann sollte man wenigstens ein paar Testreihen 
aus verschiedenen Chargen testen.

Wenn es aber ohnehin Geld kostet, die Teile zu selektieren, dann ist es 
billiger gleich entsprechend eng tolerierte Widerstände zu kaufen.

So long

Marte

Sorry about the german writing here, but it is much easier for Peter an 
me ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447656

FromJohn Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com>
Date2017-02-14 11:16 -0800
Message-ID<mol6ac541mru4no6iavcgfm1pes9tescii@4ax.com>
In reply to#447654
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:02:27 +0100, Marte Schwarz
<marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:

>Hi Peter,
>
>> Just ordinary metal film types like vishay CCF55
>> (http://www.vishay.com/docs/31015/ccf55.pdf)
>
>schau mal auf Seite 2 im eben zitierten Datenblatt unter Performance. Da 
>stehts:
>Je nach Umgebungseinfluß darf sich der Widerstandswert signifikant 
>(Jeweils um 0,5%) verändern
>
>In der Praxis werden abgeglichene Widerstände fast immer nah beieinander 
>montiert (alleine schon wegen der thermischen Drift), da sollte dann 
>auch bei beiden Widerständen ähnliches passieren. Aber wenn man sich 
>darauf verlassen soll, dann sollte man wenigstens ein paar Testreihen 
>aus verschiedenen Chargen testen.
>
>Wenn es aber ohnehin Geld kostet, die Teile zu selektieren, dann ist es 
>billiger gleich entsprechend eng tolerierte Widerstände zu kaufen.
>
>So long
>
>Marte
>
>Sorry about the german writing here, but it is much easier for Peter an 
>me ;-)


Google translates "so long" into English as "so long." It actually
sounds Asian to me.




-- 

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing   precision measurement 

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447662

FromMarte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de>
Date2017-02-14 22:45 +0100
Message-ID<o7vtpl$v47$1@news2.open-news-network.org>
In reply to#447656
Hi John,

> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."

may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)

So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
enough for now".

So long
Marte

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447674

FromJohn Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com>
Date2017-02-14 14:52 -0800
Message-ID<9d27ac5jlaaqn4ipjuski7megnvdlq2nji@4ax.com>
In reply to#447662
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
<marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:

>Hi John,
>
>> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
>
>may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
>really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
>sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
>
>So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
>enough for now".
>
>So long
>Marte

Is "so long" originally German?

We'll happily steal from anyone.

(I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
be Irish.)


-- 

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing   precision measurement 

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447676

FromLasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk>
Date2017-02-14 15:13 -0800
Message-ID<d07e660f-6093-4201-8240-aff4f6078c13@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#447674
Den tirsdag den 14. februar 2017 kl. 23.53.09 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
> <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> >Hi John,
> >
> >> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
> >
> >may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
> >really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
> >sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
> >
> >So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
> >enough for now".
> >
> >So long
> >Marte
> 
> Is "so long" originally German?
> 
> We'll happily steal from anyone.
> 
> (I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
> be Irish.)
> 

afaui "so long" is an Americanization of the greeting shalom or salaam 



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447681

FromGeorge Herold <gherold@teachspin.com>
Date2017-02-14 16:35 -0800
Message-ID<cde3929e-faea-45d7-9d7e-fe004cd7da81@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#447676
On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 6:13:57 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> Den tirsdag den 14. februar 2017 kl. 23.53.09 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
> > <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:
> > 
> > >Hi John,
> > >
> > >> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
> > >
> > >may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
> > >really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
> > >sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
> > >
> > >So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
> > >enough for now".
> > >
> > >So long
> > >Marte
> > 
> > Is "so long" originally German?
> > 
> > We'll happily steal from anyone.
> > 
> > (I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
> > be Irish.)
> > 
> 
> afaui "so long" is an Americanization of the greeting shalom or salaam

To me "so long" is a form of "good bye", "till I see you again".
a parting thought, "so long, for now"

I've got direct male decent back four generations to a George Herold
who came over from the Deutschland, I'm probably less than 1/8 
German, but I've always felt more German than I am. 

George H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447682

FromLasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk>
Date2017-02-14 16:47 -0800
Message-ID<cc4ee68d-3351-476f-a10e-69afc854ade3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#447681
Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 01.35.33 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
> On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 6:13:57 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> > Den tirsdag den 14. februar 2017 kl. 23.53.09 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
> > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
> > > <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Hi John,
> > > >
> > > >> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
> > > >
> > > >may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
> > > >really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
> > > >sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
> > > >
> > > >So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
> > > >enough for now".
> > > >
> > > >So long
> > > >Marte
> > > 
> > > Is "so long" originally German?
> > > 
> > > We'll happily steal from anyone.
> > > 
> > > (I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
> > > be Irish.)
> > > 
> > 
> > afaui "so long" is an Americanization of the greeting shalom or salaam
> 
> To me "so long" is a form of "good bye", "till I see you again".
> a parting thought, "so long, for now"

I agree, http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=so%20long

> 
> I've got direct male decent back four generations to a George Herold
> who came over from the Deutschland, I'm probably less than 1/8 
> German, but I've always felt more German than I am. 
> 

no sense of humour, preoccupied with order or take over the world German? ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447687

FromGeorge Herold <gherold@teachspin.com>
Date2017-02-14 17:29 -0800
Message-ID<24d399ba-eae1-4d1a-b517-f46f4c3f5a6c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#447682
On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 7:47:13 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 01.35.33 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
> > On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 6:13:57 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> > > Den tirsdag den 14. februar 2017 kl. 23.53.09 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
> > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
> > > > <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > >> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
> > > > >
> > > > >may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
> > > > >really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
> > > > >sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
> > > > >enough for now".
> > > > >
> > > > >So long
> > > > >Marte
> > > > 
> > > > Is "so long" originally German?
> > > > 
> > > > We'll happily steal from anyone.
> > > > 
> > > > (I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
> > > > be Irish.)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > afaui "so long" is an Americanization of the greeting shalom or salaam
> > 
> > To me "so long" is a form of "good bye", "till I see you again".
> > a parting thought, "so long, for now"
> 
> I agree, http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=so%20long
> 
> > 
> > I've got direct male decent back four generations to a George Herold
> > who came over from the Deutschland, I'm probably less than 1/8 
> > German, but I've always felt more German than I am. 
> > 
> 
> no sense of humour, preoccupied with order or take over the world German? ;)

Right, I'm totally none of that,  UB (my grad school) had an exchange 
program with a German school. (I'm thinking Wurtzburg, but that 
is probably wrong.)  I got to know many Germans who where both 
fun and hard working.  Some more this way, some more that... 
basically like everyone else.  

George H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447689

FromLasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk>
Date2017-02-14 17:45 -0800
Message-ID<4e5c5f24-a7e6-4e82-9c4d-f457a288ec68@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#447687
Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 02.29.45 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
> On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 7:47:13 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> > Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 01.35.33 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
> > > On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 6:13:57 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> > > > Den tirsdag den 14. februar 2017 kl. 23.53.09 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
> > > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
> > > > > <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > >Hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
> > > > > >really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
> > > > > >sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
> > > > > >enough for now".
> > > > > >
> > > > > >So long
> > > > > >Marte
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is "so long" originally German?
> > > > > 
> > > > > We'll happily steal from anyone.
> > > > > 
> > > > > (I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
> > > > > be Irish.)
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > afaui "so long" is an Americanization of the greeting shalom or salaam
> > > 
> > > To me "so long" is a form of "good bye", "till I see you again".
> > > a parting thought, "so long, for now"
> > 
> > I agree, http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=so%20long
> > 
> > > 
> > > I've got direct male decent back four generations to a George Herold
> > > who came over from the Deutschland, I'm probably less than 1/8 
> > > German, but I've always felt more German than I am. 
> > > 
> > 
> > no sense of humour, preoccupied with order or take over the world German? ;)
> 
> Right, I'm totally none of that,  UB (my grad school) had an exchange 
> program with a German school. (I'm thinking Wurtzburg, but that 
> is probably wrong.)  I got to know many Germans who where both 
> fun and hard working.  Some more this way, some more that... 
> basically like everyone else.  
> 

Wurtzburg that is in Bavaria, I'm not sure they really consider themselves
German, Bavaria is like the German Texas or something :) 


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447691

FromGeorge Herold <gherold@teachspin.com>
Date2017-02-14 18:17 -0800
Message-ID<852e217c-1171-468c-9eea-c27cb5d8f38e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#447689
On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 8:45:31 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 02.29.45 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
> > On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 7:47:13 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> > > Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 01.35.33 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
> > > > On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 6:13:57 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
> > > > > Den tirsdag den 14. februar 2017 kl. 23.53.09 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
> > > > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
> > > > > > <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >Hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
> > > > > > >really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
> > > > > > >sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
> > > > > > >enough for now".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >So long
> > > > > > >Marte
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is "so long" originally German?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > We'll happily steal from anyone.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > (I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
> > > > > > be Irish.)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > afaui "so long" is an Americanization of the greeting shalom or salaam
> > > > 
> > > > To me "so long" is a form of "good bye", "till I see you again".
> > > > a parting thought, "so long, for now"
> > > 
> > > I agree, http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=so%20long
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I've got direct male decent back four generations to a George Herold
> > > > who came over from the Deutschland, I'm probably less than 1/8 
> > > > German, but I've always felt more German than I am. 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > no sense of humour, preoccupied with order or take over the world German? ;)
> > 
> > Right, I'm totally none of that,  UB (my grad school) had an exchange 
> > program with a German school. (I'm thinking Wurtzburg, but that 
> > is probably wrong.)  I got to know many Germans who where both 
> > fun and hard working.  Some more this way, some more that... 
> > basically like everyone else.  
> > 
> 
> Wurtzburg that is in Bavaria, I'm not sure they really consider themselves
> German, Bavaria is like the German Texas or something :)

Ahh well then, I think my ancestors came from some where south of 
Wurtzburg, they were Catholics, coming to America. :^)

George H.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#447693

FromJohn Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com>
Date2017-02-14 18:37 -0800
Message-ID<0kf7actggsl5hcvuguq7e68nmsoh3jt7bg@4ax.com>
In reply to#447689
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:45:22 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
<langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

>Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 02.29.45 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
>> On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 7:47:13 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
>> > Den onsdag den 15. februar 2017 kl. 01.35.33 UTC+1 skrev George Herold:
>> > > On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 6:13:57 PM UTC-5, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
>> > > > Den tirsdag den 14. februar 2017 kl. 23.53.09 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
>> > > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:45:24 +0100, Marte Schwarz
>> > > > > <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> wrote:
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > >Hi John,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Google translates "so long" into English as "so long."
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >may be it is such a denglish word that "should" sound like english but 
>> > > > > >really is a nativ german slang like "Handy" which means mobile but 
>> > > > > >sounds like an english word and therefore more cool;-)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >So long at the end of a paragraph means not more or les than "it's 
>> > > > > >enough for now".
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >So long
>> > > > > >Marte
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Is "so long" originally German?
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > We'll happily steal from anyone.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > (I'm 3/4 German myself, but I never learned the language. I pretend to
>> > > > > be Irish.)
>> > > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > afaui "so long" is an Americanization of the greeting shalom or salaam
>> > > 
>> > > To me "so long" is a form of "good bye", "till I see you again".
>> > > a parting thought, "so long, for now"
>> > 
>> > I agree, http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=so%20long
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > > I've got direct male decent back four generations to a George Herold
>> > > who came over from the Deutschland, I'm probably less than 1/8 
>> > > German, but I've always felt more German than I am. 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > no sense of humour, preoccupied with order or take over the world German? ;)
>> 
>> Right, I'm totally none of that,  UB (my grad school) had an exchange 
>> program with a German school. (I'm thinking Wurtzburg, but that 
>> is probably wrong.)  I got to know many Germans who where both 
>> fun and hard working.  Some more this way, some more that... 
>> basically like everyone else.  
>> 
>
>Wurtzburg that is in Bavaria, I'm not sure they really consider themselves
>German, Bavaria is like the German Texas or something :) 
>
>

It's not our fault that we speak a form of English. The Brits made us
do it.

Do they have barbeque in Bavaria?


-- 

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design


csiph-web