Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #459158 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-06 16:33 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-05-07 07:53 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 126 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-06 16:33 -0700
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-06 20:36 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-07 07:51 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-05-07 10:38 +0000
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 07:46 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 11:06 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-05-08 11:19 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-08 21:09 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-12 16:50 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-12 23:40 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-12 18:57 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-07 20:58 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-05-07 13:21 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 13:35 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 17:11 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-05-07 14:27 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 15:08 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-05-07 15:28 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 15:36 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-07 20:58 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-08 00:51 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-05-09 18:20 +0000
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-09 12:06 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-09 20:02 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-12 16:48 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-12 19:41 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-12 19:24 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-13 09:02 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-13 10:57 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-11 19:02 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-14 16:10 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-11 18:57 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-12 20:26 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-12 19:23 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... kevin93 <kevin@whitedigs.com> - 2017-05-12 20:33 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-12 22:19 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-13 08:40 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-13 08:29 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-13 21:10 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-13 20:41 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-13 10:46 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-13 21:02 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-05-13 23:01 +0000
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-13 20:52 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-14 07:54 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-14 01:19 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-14 07:24 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-13 20:11 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-05-13 23:00 +0000
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-13 20:49 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-13 20:04 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-12 16:45 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-05-13 00:17 +0000
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-13 08:37 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-13 08:52 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-13 21:02 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-13 17:29 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-14 00:13 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-13 20:26 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-07 20:56 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 19:50 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 16:56 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 14:57 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-08 00:57 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 19:42 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 10:04 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 09:56 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 07:41 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-07 08:38 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 09:03 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 12:25 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 12:32 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-07 09:39 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 13:56 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-05-07 18:59 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 09:53 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 14:05 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 11:26 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 14:42 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 14:46 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 13:31 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 17:25 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 15:16 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-08 10:27 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-08 08:06 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-08 12:28 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-08 10:05 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-08 18:27 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-08 13:12 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-08 13:02 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... dplatt@coop.radagast.org (Dave Platt) - 2017-05-08 14:27 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-08 15:22 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-08 18:30 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-08 20:45 +0100
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-08 14:42 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-05-07 16:28 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-07 16:35 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-08 10:24 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-08 10:09 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-08 21:16 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 20:07 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-08 10:32 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-08 10:16 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-08 13:54 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... Joseph Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2017-05-07 19:05 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-07 21:07 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-08 12:41 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-08 10:19 -0700
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-08 18:37 -0400
Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 19:58 -0700
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 01:33 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-05-07 10:36 +0000
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 08:41 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-05-07 12:56 +0000
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 09:35 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 09:42 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 08:24 -0700
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-07 08:36 -0700
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-05-07 16:33 +0000
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 13:59 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-07 20:53 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 08:15 -0700
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 12:08 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-05-07 06:42 -0700
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-05-07 09:47 -0400
Re: OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-07 07:53 -0700
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 16:33 -0700 |
| Subject | OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <88nsgc9tkfv5ragljcdjoae66ooo5fpc0p@4ax.com> |
OT: A description of some of the "designers" here...
<http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447385/science-identify-politics-conflict-inside-progressive-left>
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
"It is not in doing what you like, but in liking what you do that
is the secret of happiness." -James Barrie
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bill.sloman@ieee.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 20:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <205181c5-691a-4cae-aa03-19bf24ce8c81@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459158 |
On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 9:33:32 AM UTC+10, Jim Thompson wrote: > OT: A description of some of the "designers" here... > > <http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447385/science-identify-politics-conflict-inside-progressive-left> Anybody who thinks that Charles Murray's contribution in "The Bell Curve" was in any way scientific hasn't read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inequality_by_Design and doesn't know much about science. Kevin D. Williamson may understand identity politics, but he's a bit weak on on science, as you'd expect in somebody with a B.A. in English Literature from the University of Texas. Jim's scientific background is better - but not much. Like John Larkin he went through university learning only the stuff he thought that he could use to make money. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 07:51 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <9LGdnWMVvM9AXpPEnZ2dnUU7-L_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #459176 |
>wrote in message >news:205181c5-691a-4cae-aa03-19bf24ce8c81@googlegroups.com... >Jim's scientific background is better - but not much. Like John Larkin he >went through university learning only the stuff he thought that he could >use to make money. And the problem with that is what, exactly? -- Kevin Aylward http://www.anasoft.co.uk - SuperSpice http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 10:38 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #459185 |
On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: > And the problem with that is what, exactly? Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bill.sloman@ieee.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 07:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <7ef019f3-07d5-4fa5-94d1-9fdb50b76f1c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459198 |
On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 8:41:35 PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: > > > And the problem with that is what, exactly? > > Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. Cursitor Doom thinks I'm a communist - he knows I'm a socialist, and doesn't know enough to realise that communists were no more socialist than the German National Socialists. But Cursitor Doom does have an excuse - he doesn't seem to have been to any kind of tertiary institution, and reads the Mail, which is not so much low-brow as no-brow. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 11:06 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <bKGPA.29219$Gw3.16185@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #459221 |
On 05/07/2017 10:46 AM, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: > On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 8:41:35 PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: >> >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? >> >> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. > > Cursitor Doom thinks I'm a communist - he knows I'm a socialist, and doesn't know enough to realise that communists were no more socialist than the German National Socialists. But Cursitor Doom does have an excuse - he doesn't seem to have been to any kind of tertiary institution, and reads the Mail, which is not so much low-brow as no-brow. > Which was the mag with the girls in it? "Page 6" girls? It was weird growing up in America and then visiting a place like the UK or Europe where they show nude people on daytime TV and there are porn magazines just lying around for sale in the open. Meanwhile they didn't even let people get tattoos legally in Massachusetts until about 5 years ago. What a ripoff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-08 11:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <rsidnezj3_0LK43EnZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #459226 |
On 2017/05/07 8:06 AM, bitrex wrote: > On 05/07/2017 10:46 AM, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: >> On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 8:41:35 PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: >>> >>>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? >>> >>> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. >> >> Cursitor Doom thinks I'm a communist - he knows I'm a socialist, and >> doesn't know enough to realise that communists were no more socialist >> than the German National Socialists. But Cursitor Doom does have an >> excuse - he doesn't seem to have been to any kind of tertiary >> institution, and reads the Mail, which is not so much low-brow as >> no-brow. >> > > Which was the mag with the girls in it? "Page 6" girls? > > It was weird growing up in America and then visiting a place like the UK > or Europe where they show nude people on daytime TV and there are porn > magazines just lying around for sale in the open. Meanwhile they didn't > even let people get tattoos legally in Massachusetts until about 5 years > ago. > > What a ripoff. You need to remember that the US was founded by right wing religious extremists (Pilgrims!) who were essentially kicked out of the UK and Europe for being too hard to live with. Things south of the border haven't improved much since then...(ducking). Canada was founded by Loyalists (to the UK crown), Irish invaders (really - read up on the Finnegan raids), voyageurs, Metis, and other folks who mostly just wanted to get along with each other. No wild west here, the Mounties (NorthWest Mounted Police as they were known then) were in place before that nonsense could happen. Not that the Mounties don't have their problems...but who doesn't? John ;-#)#
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bill.sloman@ieee.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-08 21:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <b7ebb730-e9b2-4eaa-8fde-ad39d2dbffdd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459226 |
On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 1:06:51 AM UTC+10, bitrex wrote: > On 05/07/2017 10:46 AM, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: > > On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 8:41:35 PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote: > >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: > >> > >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? > >> > >> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. > > > > Cursitor Doom thinks I'm a communist - he knows I'm a socialist, and doesn't know enough to realise that communists were no more socialist than the German National Socialists. But Cursitor Doom does have an excuse - he doesn't seem to have been to any kind of tertiary institution, and reads the Mail, which is not so much low-brow as no-brow. > > Which was the mag with the girls in it? "Page 6" girls? Rupert Murdoch's "Sun" and the under-dressed girls were on page 3. > It was weird growing up in America and then visiting a place like the UK > or Europe where they show nude people on daytime TV and there are porn > magazines just lying around for sale in the open. Meanwhile they didn't > even let people get tattoos legally in Massachusetts until about 5 years > ago. > > What a ripoff. America is a strange place. You probably need to be more cynical - porn was banned in the US, which made it more expensive, which meant that the people who sold it had better control of the distribution and could extract higher margins. Lenny Bruce's claim that the FBI and the Mafia were in conspiracy to keep the price of heroin in the US high does have more than a grain of truth. The religious right does seem to be mainly motivated by the visceral satisfaction they get from stopping other people have a good time, but "harm reduction" is a much better principle to use in regulating recreational drugs and reading. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-12 16:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <3epRA.180174$kI.47510@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #459508 |
On 05/09/2017 12:09 AM, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: > > The religious right does seem to be mainly motivated by the visceral satisfaction they get from stopping other people have a good time, but "harm reduction" is a much better principle to use in regulating recreational drugs and reading. > They're statistically the biggest consumers of porn, though. Though they say they don't do that sort of thing. Like everything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-12 23:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <y-edncxXvI5ppIvEnZ2dnUU7-UPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #460015 |
"bitrex" wrote in message news:3epRA.180174$kI.47510@fx43.iad... On 05/09/2017 12:09 AM, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: > >> The religious right does seem to be mainly motivated by the visceral >> satisfaction they get from stopping other people have a good time, but >> "harm reduction" is a much better principle to use in >regulating >> recreational drugs and reading. > >They're statistically the biggest consumers of porn, though. Though they >say they don't do that sort of thing. Like everything else. So, as a rampant atheist, I must be one of those Gaussian 6 sigma outliers... -- Kevin Aylward http://www.anasoft.co.uk - SuperSpice http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bill.sloman@ieee.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-12 18:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <a931c590-b4d7-4dc6-9121-13a36cbc68a1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460020 |
On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 8:41:01 AM UTC+10, Kevin Aylward wrote: > "bitrex" wrote in message news:3epRA.180174$kI.47510@fx43.iad... > > On 05/09/2017 12:09 AM, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: > > > > >> The religious right does seem to be mainly motivated by the visceral > >> satisfaction they get from stopping other people have a good time, but > >> "harm reduction" is a much better principle to use in >regulating > >> recreational drugs and reading. > > > > >They're statistically the biggest consumers of porn, though. Though they > >say they don't do that sort of thing. Like everything else. > > So, as a rampant atheist, I must be one of those Gaussian 6 sigma > outliers... That doesn't follow. The null hypothesis would be that the religious are just as likely to consume porn as anybody else, including atheist. Of course, somebody who isn't going to believe in a god for which there's no objective evidence might be expected to be less likely to get sexual thrills from a sex object that was just pixels on a screen, but that's mere hypothesis. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 20:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <pcSdnRGK6In-4ZLEnZ2dnUU7-TnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #459198 |
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: > And the problem with that is what, exactly? >Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. -- Kevin Aylward http://www.anasoft.co.uk - SuperSpice http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 13:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <23717542-9d35-4705-9132-03d2edd98b33@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459282 |
Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: > "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... > > On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: > > > And the problem with that is what, exactly? > > >Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. > > The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care > about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, > you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 13:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <u61vgcpcpjpljn6e1dh6c8777fjdbii9or@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #459288 |
On Sun, 7 May 2017 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: >Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: >> "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... >> >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: >> >> > And the problem with that is what, exactly? >> >> >Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. >> >> The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care >> about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, >> you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. > >but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in >womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;) Now, don't go calling me names. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 17:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <N3MPA.141535$Qa2.93527@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #459288 |
On 05/07/2017 04:21 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: > Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: >> "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... >> >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: >> >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? >> >>> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. >> >> The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care >> about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, >> you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. > > but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in > womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;) > I know how you feel. I went to a liberal arts college and every day I'd see these free-spirited conventionally attractive 19 to 23 year old women around campus, talking about their sexuality, wanting you to come back to their apartment alone to have drinks and discuss their feelings on patriarchal oppression, the exchange students moping about how they couldn't wait for the warm weather to come because it was too cold to wear a bikini in Sweden regularly. The 60/40 female-male-ratio was completely overwhelming and I really felt like I was on enemy territory. It was HORRIBLE. I have no idea how my masculinity survived intact.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 14:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <6d421be1-c3d1-4468-8220-1a7c2f288e32@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459302 |
Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 23.11.18 UTC+2 skrev bitrex: > On 05/07/2017 04:21 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: > > Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: > >> "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... > >> > >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: > >> > >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? > >> > >>> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. > >> > >> The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care > >> about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, > >> you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. > > > > but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in > > womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;) > > > > I know how you feel. I went to a liberal arts college and every day I'd > see these free-spirited conventionally attractive 19 to 23 year old > women around campus, talking about their sexuality, wanting you to come > back to their apartment alone to have drinks and discuss their feelings > on patriarchal oppression, the exchange students moping about how they > couldn't wait for the warm weather to come because it was too cold to > wear a bikini in Sweden regularly. > > The 60/40 female-male-ratio was completely overwhelming and I really > felt like I was on enemy territory. It was HORRIBLE. I have no idea how > my masculinity survived intact. you didn't get the memo? masculinity is now "toxic" and an example of how the patriarchy also oppresses men
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 15:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <d36vgc1cmnjt8q2o00j9t6v88hn3qaf1i6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #459305 |
On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:27:39 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: >Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 23.11.18 UTC+2 skrev bitrex: >> On 05/07/2017 04:21 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: >> > Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: >> >> "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... >> >> >> >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: >> >> >> >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? >> >> >> >>> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. >> >> >> >> The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care >> >> about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, >> >> you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. >> > >> > but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in >> > womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;) >> > >> >> I know how you feel. I went to a liberal arts college and every day I'd >> see these free-spirited conventionally attractive 19 to 23 year old >> women around campus, talking about their sexuality, wanting you to come >> back to their apartment alone to have drinks and discuss their feelings >> on patriarchal oppression, the exchange students moping about how they >> couldn't wait for the warm weather to come because it was too cold to >> wear a bikini in Sweden regularly. >> >> The 60/40 female-male-ratio was completely overwhelming and I really >> felt like I was on enemy territory. It was HORRIBLE. I have no idea how >> my masculinity survived intact. > >you didn't get the memo? masculinity is now "toxic" and an example of how >the patriarchy also oppresses men We went through sex/drugs/rock-and-roll, free speech, sexual revolution, and feminism, to breed a geneartion of frightened neurotics? Note that Trump, of the three wives and girl-part-grabbing, won the majority of the white female vote. Some women still want their guys to behave a little like cavemen. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 15:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <8e4e714a-af36-4bf4-b921-4cec089ec2cb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459313 |
Den mandag den 8. maj 2017 kl. 00.08.18 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin: > On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:27:39 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen > <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: > > >Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 23.11.18 UTC+2 skrev bitrex: > >> On 05/07/2017 04:21 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: > >> > Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: > >> >> "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? > >> >> > >> >>> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. > >> >> > >> >> The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care > >> >> about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, > >> >> you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. > >> > > >> > but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in > >> > womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;) > >> > > >> > >> I know how you feel. I went to a liberal arts college and every day I'd > >> see these free-spirited conventionally attractive 19 to 23 year old > >> women around campus, talking about their sexuality, wanting you to come > >> back to their apartment alone to have drinks and discuss their feelings > >> on patriarchal oppression, the exchange students moping about how they > >> couldn't wait for the warm weather to come because it was too cold to > >> wear a bikini in Sweden regularly. > >> > >> The 60/40 female-male-ratio was completely overwhelming and I really > >> felt like I was on enemy territory. It was HORRIBLE. I have no idea how > >> my masculinity survived intact. > > > >you didn't get the memo? masculinity is now "toxic" and an example of how > >the patriarchy also oppresses men > > We went through sex/drugs/rock-and-roll, free speech, sexual > revolution, and feminism, to breed a geneartion of frightened > neurotics? > > Note that Trump, of the three wives and girl-part-grabbing, won the > majority of the white female vote. womens studies also have an explanation for that, those women are suffering from "internalized misogyny", ofcourse caused by the patriarchy > Some women still want their guys to > behave a little like cavemen. there is probably a reason why "Fifty Shades of Grey" is a best seller
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 15:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <b98vgcd8g8d8ql6jm0l3ccatekhlcv2lrj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #459315 |
On Sun, 7 May 2017 15:28:24 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: >Den mandag den 8. maj 2017 kl. 00.08.18 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin: >> On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:27:39 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: >> >> >Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 23.11.18 UTC+2 skrev bitrex: >> >> On 05/07/2017 04:21 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: >> >> > Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: >> >> >> "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? >> >> >> >> >> >>> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. >> >> >> >> >> >> The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care >> >> >> about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, >> >> >> you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. >> >> > >> >> > but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in >> >> > womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;) >> >> > >> >> >> >> I know how you feel. I went to a liberal arts college and every day I'd >> >> see these free-spirited conventionally attractive 19 to 23 year old >> >> women around campus, talking about their sexuality, wanting you to come >> >> back to their apartment alone to have drinks and discuss their feelings >> >> on patriarchal oppression, the exchange students moping about how they >> >> couldn't wait for the warm weather to come because it was too cold to >> >> wear a bikini in Sweden regularly. >> >> >> >> The 60/40 female-male-ratio was completely overwhelming and I really >> >> felt like I was on enemy territory. It was HORRIBLE. I have no idea how >> >> my masculinity survived intact. >> > >> >you didn't get the memo? masculinity is now "toxic" and an example of how >> >the patriarchy also oppresses men >> >> We went through sex/drugs/rock-and-roll, free speech, sexual >> revolution, and feminism, to breed a geneartion of frightened >> neurotics? >> >> Note that Trump, of the three wives and girl-part-grabbing, won the >> majority of the white female vote. > >womens studies also have an explanation for that, those women are suffering >from "internalized misogyny", ofcourse caused by the patriarchy > >> Some women still want their guys to >> behave a little like cavemen. > >there is probably a reason why "Fifty Shades of Grey" is a best seller Sexuality isn't what we are, it's just something that we do. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-07 20:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: A description of some of the "designers" here... |
| Message-ID | <5kgvgctbu6u4jqetbq1lvhivncdbriasfa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #459313 |
On Sun, 07 May 2017 15:08:10 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:27:39 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen ><langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: > >>Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 23.11.18 UTC+2 skrev bitrex: >>> On 05/07/2017 04:21 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote: >>> > Den søndag den 7. maj 2017 kl. 21.58.35 UTC+2 skrev Kevin Aylward: >>> >> "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message news:oemteo$d0o$4@dont-email.me... >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, 07 May 2017 07:51:09 +0100, Kevin Aylward wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> And the problem with that is what, exactly? >>> >> >>> >>> Commies don't approve. They think it so low-brow. >>> >> >>> >> The alternative is to go to uni to do womens studies, because you don't care >>> >> about money, but since you now can't get a job with such a qualification, >>> >> you will now sponge welfare of those that did go to uni to make money. >>> > >>> > but you don't have to feel guilty about it because that after a degree in >>> > womens studies you know that all bad things are caused by the hetero-normative white Judeo-Christian capitalist patriarchy ;) >>> > >>> >>> I know how you feel. I went to a liberal arts college and every day I'd >>> see these free-spirited conventionally attractive 19 to 23 year old >>> women around campus, talking about their sexuality, wanting you to come >>> back to their apartment alone to have drinks and discuss their feelings >>> on patriarchal oppression, the exchange students moping about how they >>> couldn't wait for the warm weather to come because it was too cold to >>> wear a bikini in Sweden regularly. >>> >>> The 60/40 female-male-ratio was completely overwhelming and I really >>> felt like I was on enemy territory. It was HORRIBLE. I have no idea how >>> my masculinity survived intact. >> >>you didn't get the memo? masculinity is now "toxic" and an example of how >>the patriarchy also oppresses men > >We went through sex/drugs/rock-and-roll, free speech, sexual >revolution, and feminism, to breed a geneartion of frightened >neurotics? Sure. Responsibility is taught. When it's not, you end up with snowflakes. >Note that Trump, of the three wives and girl-part-grabbing, won the >majority of the white female vote. Some women still want their guys to >behave a little like cavemen. Bad boys have always been popular.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web