Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #746245 > unrolled thread

This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design

Contents

  This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-08-08 17:42 +0000
    Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2026-08-10 15:54 +0000
      Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-08-10 20:53 +0200
        Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2026-08-11 15:07 +0000
          Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2026-08-11 12:14 -0500
            Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2026-08-12 23:01 +0000
              Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-08-12 18:01 -0700
                Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-08-13 02:10 +0100
                  Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2026-08-13 14:06 +0000
                    Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-08-14 00:14 +1000
                    Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-08-13 15:13 +0000
                      Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 18:03 +0100
                  Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-08-13 08:56 -0700
        Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-08-11 16:07 +0100
          Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2026-08-12 23:01 +0000
            Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-08-13 10:38 +0200
              Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-08-13 09:02 -0700
                Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-08-13 19:05 +0200
                  Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-08-13 13:06 -0700
              Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-05 23:42 -0300
                Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-09-06 10:14 +0200
                  Usent history (was Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-06 11:08 -0300
                    Re: Usent history (was Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze) Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-09-06 18:47 +0000
            Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-08-13 18:42 +1000
          Re: This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-08-13 00:12 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#746245 — This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze

From:
 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/08/260806050706.htm

This tiny gold crystal could bring quantum technology out of the deep freeze
Date:
 August 8, 2026
Source:
 Louisiana State University
Summary:
 Scientists have created the first quantum material that can sort and transport
 different quantum states of light at room temperature, potentially removing
 the need for bulky, ultra-cold refrigeration systems.
 Built from a gold film carved with hundreds of microscopic structures,
 the ultrathin “metacrystal” acts like a filter that directs different kinds
 of quantum light along separate paths while preserving the information they
 carry.

So 2 slit experiment multy slit experiment ???
hehe

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#746310

Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> spake the secret code
<1157pqq$1n17h$1@dont-email.me> thusly:

>So 2 slit experiment multy slit experiment ???

Please do tell us what electronics design you are doing that involves
this equipment or anything even closely related.  For that matter,
just tell us *anything* you're actually designing or have designed.

You seem to be simply a press release copy/paster.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
            The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746318

On 8/10/26 17:54, Richard wrote:
> Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> spake the secret code
> <1157pqq$1n17h$1@dont-email.me> thusly:
> 
>> So 2 slit experiment multy slit experiment ???
> 
> Please do tell us what electronics design you are doing that involves
> this equipment or anything even closely related.  For that matter,
> just tell us *anything* you're actually designing or have designed.
> 
> You seem to be simply a press release copy/paster.

Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
the years. What did you contribute?

Jeroen Belleman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746340

Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> spake the secret code
<115d6o3$3cino$1@dont-email.me> thusly:

>On 8/10/26 17:54, Richard wrote:
>> Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> spake the secret code
>> <1157pqq$1n17h$1@dont-email.me> thusly:
>> 
>>> So 2 slit experiment multy slit experiment ???
>> 
>> Please do tell us what electronics design you are doing that involves
>> this equipment or anything even closely related.  For that matter,
>> just tell us *anything* you're actually designing or have designed.
>> 
>> You seem to be simply a press release copy/paster.
>
>Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
>the years. What did you contribute?

My news spool doesn't go back years, it only holds 30 days or so.  In
that time I just seem him copy/pasting press releases.

I already posted a list of stuff I'm working on in a previous
discussion around his copy/paste press releases.  I'm happy to discuss
any of that.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
            The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746349

If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.

-- 
John Hasler 
john@sugarbit.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746383

John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> spake the secret code
<87bjb837gx.fsf@sugarbit.com> thusly:

>If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.

You're not the boss of me.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
            The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746386

On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 23:01:29 -0000 (UTC),
legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) wrote:

>John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> spake the secret code
><87bjb837gx.fsf@sugarbit.com> thusly:
>
>>If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.
>
>You're not the boss of me.

Gosh. Nasty.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746387

On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:01:54 -0700, john larkin <jl@htigct.com> wrote:

>>>If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.
>>
>>You're not the boss of me.
>
>Gosh. Nasty.

Careful! 

He'll pull on his leather chaps and give your buttocks a good
spanking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746416

JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
<ca6q7ldndrrvmho8mfj8tc3i0edmc74ar5@4ax.com> thusly:

>On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:01:54 -0700, john larkin <jl@htigct.com> wrote:
>
>>>>If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.
>>>
>>>You're not the boss of me.
>>
>>Gosh. Nasty.
>
>Careful! 
>
>He'll pull on his leather chaps and give your buttocks a good
>spanking.

You guys are really inept at flaming.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
            The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746417

On 14/08/2026 12:06 am, Richard wrote:
> JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
> <ca6q7ldndrrvmho8mfj8tc3i0edmc74ar5@4ax.com> thusly:
> 
>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:01:54 -0700, john larkin <jl@htigct.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.
>>>>
>>>> You're not the boss of me.
>>>
>>> Gosh. Nasty.
>>
>> Careful!
>>
>> He'll pull on his leather chaps and give your buttocks a good
>> spanking.
> 
> You guys are really inept at flaming.

It is sci.electronics.design not alt.flame.

You want to get flamed? Go someplace where the skill (such as it is) is 
taken seriously.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746418

>legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard)wrote:
>>JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
><ca6q7ldndrrvmho8mfj8tc3i0edmc74ar5@4ax.com> thusly:
>
>>On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:01:54 -0700, john larkin <jl@htigct.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.
>>>>
>>>>You're not the boss of me.
>>>
>>>Gosh. Nasty.
>>
>>Careful! 
>>
>>He'll pull on his leather chaps and give your buttocks a good
>>spanking.
>
>You guys are really inept at flaming.

I dunno who or what you are but if you keep attacking me then I was thinking about advertising online for a lawyer or lawyer group
that sues you and your boss for an amount that is similar to what happened to those google guys pestering some blogger.
And this is not a closed group.
All you have done do far is make trouble.
Get the fuck out of here.
And if that does not work   ;-)

Anyways kill file for you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746474

On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:13:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

>I dunno who or what you are but if you keep attacking me then I was thinking about advertising online for a lawyer or lawyer group
>that sues you and your boss for an amount that is similar to what happened to those google guys pestering some blogger.

That's a bit OTT Jan, I'm sure Richard is a perfectly pleasant fellow
in person.  

Send him a couple of space cakes to take the edge off of things...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746420

On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 02:10:57 +0100, JM
<sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:01:54 -0700, john larkin <jl@htigct.com> wrote:
>
>>>>If you find his postings tedious put him in your killfile and move on.
>>>
>>>You're not the boss of me.
>>
>>Gosh. Nasty.
>
>Careful! 
>
>He'll pull on his leather chaps and give your buttocks a good
>spanking.

These netcops wouldn't dare be so nasty in real life. Somebody would
take them out back and decorate them with blood, and they know it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746341

On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:53:54 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

>Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
>the years. What did you contribute?

The lad is heading for a stroke getting into such a state over usenet
posts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746382

JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
<ohem7lptsvtfs321p0gc6vucuf121rumfj@4ax.com> thusly:

>On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:53:54 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
><jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>
>>Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
>>the years. What did you contribute?
>
>The lad is heading for a stroke getting into such a state over usenet
>posts.

I guess you're new to usenet.  Policing off-topic posts has been a
thing since the beginning.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
            The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746405

On 8/13/26 01:01, Richard wrote:
> JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
> <ohem7lptsvtfs321p0gc6vucuf121rumfj@4ax.com> thusly:
> 
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:53:54 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>>
>>> Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
>>> the years. What did you contribute?
>>
>> The lad is heading for a stroke getting into such a state over usenet
>> posts.
> 
> I guess you're new to usenet.  Policing off-topic posts has been a
> thing since the beginning.

In the beginning, only civilized people knew of, and used, usenet.
They were all polite, reasonable and knowledgeable. There were only
a few groups and it was easy to follow and read *all* of it. We used
the newsreader 'rn' over 4800 baud connections to a pdp-11 running
Unix and a dumb VT100 terminal. The web didn't exist. Berners-Lee
didn't even work at CERN yet.

Insecure? You bet! But security wasn't yet needed. Everyone cooperated
to make things run better! There were hackers, sure, but they weren't
malicious, just curious.

Those days are far behind us now. The pioneers have retired or died
and rabble has taken over.

Jeroen Belleman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746421

On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:38:30 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

>On 8/13/26 01:01, Richard wrote:
>> JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
>> <ohem7lptsvtfs321p0gc6vucuf121rumfj@4ax.com> thusly:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:53:54 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
>>>> the years. What did you contribute?
>>>
>>> The lad is heading for a stroke getting into such a state over usenet
>>> posts.
>> 
>> I guess you're new to usenet.  Policing off-topic posts has been a
>> thing since the beginning.
>
>In the beginning, only civilized people knew of, and used, usenet.
>They were all polite, reasonable and knowledgeable. There were only
>a few groups and it was easy to follow and read *all* of it. We used
>the newsreader 'rn' over 4800 baud connections to a pdp-11 running
>Unix and a dumb VT100 terminal. The web didn't exist. Berners-Lee
>didn't even work at CERN yet.
>
>Insecure? You bet! But security wasn't yet needed. Everyone cooperated
>to make things run better! There were hackers, sure, but they weren't
>malicious, just curious.
>
>Those days are far behind us now. The pioneers have retired or died
>and rabble has taken over.
>
>Jeroen Belleman

All true, but please don't insult the PDP-11. It was a beautiful
machine.

Pity we went the barbaric 4004-8008-x86-windows route.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746427

On 8/13/26 18:02, john larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:38:30 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/13/26 01:01, Richard wrote:
>>> JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
>>> <ohem7lptsvtfs321p0gc6vucuf121rumfj@4ax.com> thusly:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:53:54 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
>>>>> the years. What did you contribute?
>>>>
>>>> The lad is heading for a stroke getting into such a state over usenet
>>>> posts.
>>>
>>> I guess you're new to usenet.  Policing off-topic posts has been a
>>> thing since the beginning.
>>
>> In the beginning, only civilized people knew of, and used, usenet.
>> They were all polite, reasonable and knowledgeable. There were only
>> a few groups and it was easy to follow and read *all* of it. We used
>> the newsreader 'rn' over 4800 baud connections to a pdp-11 running
>> Unix and a dumb VT100 terminal. The web didn't exist. Berners-Lee
>> didn't even work at CERN yet.
>>
>> Insecure? You bet! But security wasn't yet needed. Everyone cooperated
>> to make things run better! There were hackers, sure, but they weren't
>> malicious, just curious.
>>
>> Those days are far behind us now. The pioneers have retired or died
>> and rabble has taken over.
>>
>> Jeroen Belleman
> 
> All true, but please don't insult the PDP-11. It was a beautiful
> machine.
> 
> Pity we went the barbaric 4004-8008-x86-windows route.
> 

Imagine a PDP-11, or a 68k-like machine, running at 2GHz...
Alas, money makes the choice, and it often chooses wrong.

Jeroen Belleman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#746436

On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:05:31 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

>On 8/13/26 18:02, john larkin wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:38:30 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/13/26 01:01, Richard wrote:
>>>> JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> spake the secret code
>>>> <ohem7lptsvtfs321p0gc6vucuf121rumfj@4ax.com> thusly:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:53:54 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>>>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan has contributed quite a lot of electronics to the group over
>>>>>> the years. What did you contribute?
>>>>>
>>>>> The lad is heading for a stroke getting into such a state over usenet
>>>>> posts.
>>>>
>>>> I guess you're new to usenet.  Policing off-topic posts has been a
>>>> thing since the beginning.
>>>
>>> In the beginning, only civilized people knew of, and used, usenet.
>>> They were all polite, reasonable and knowledgeable. There were only
>>> a few groups and it was easy to follow and read *all* of it. We used
>>> the newsreader 'rn' over 4800 baud connections to a pdp-11 running
>>> Unix and a dumb VT100 terminal. The web didn't exist. Berners-Lee
>>> didn't even work at CERN yet.
>>>
>>> Insecure? You bet! But security wasn't yet needed. Everyone cooperated
>>> to make things run better! There were hackers, sure, but they weren't
>>> malicious, just curious.
>>>
>>> Those days are far behind us now. The pioneers have retired or died
>>> and rabble has taken over.
>>>
>>> Jeroen Belleman
>> 
>> All true, but please don't insult the PDP-11. It was a beautiful
>> machine.
>> 
>> Pity we went the barbaric 4004-8008-x86-windows route.
>> 
>
>Imagine a PDP-11, or a 68k-like machine, running at 2GHz...
>Alas, money makes the choice, and it often chooses wrong.
>
>Jeroen Belleman

I think here was a non-microcoded sorta-RISC version of the 68K.

I'm thinking that the future should be a 256 or 1024 or 4096 core
RiscV on a chip. And a suitable new OS.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#747267

Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> writes:
> In the beginning, only civilized people knew of, and used, usenet.
> They were all polite, reasonable and knowledgeable. There were only
> a few groups and it was easy to follow and read *all* of it. We used
> the newsreader 'rn' over 4800 baud connections to a pdp-11

I think you have forgotten Bandygrams.  There was never a time when
everyone on Usenet was polite and reasonable.  Knowledgeable, maybe.

Kragen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design

csiph-web