Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #466689 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-07-13 02:57 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 379 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. leongdentalsf@gmail.com - 2017-07-03 06:23 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. leongdentalsf@gmail.com - 2017-07-03 06:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:26 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 11:09 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-03 09:54 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 18:02 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-03 16:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-04 12:10 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 11:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-07-05 13:49 +1000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 21:31 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-07-05 16:03 +1000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 17:04 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 14:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 18:28 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 20:57 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-03 14:57 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 00:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 02:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 21:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-05 08:52 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 23:30 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:35 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 08:03 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:09 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:08 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-04 09:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 20:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:20 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-05 08:54 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 18:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 23:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-05 17:27 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-06 06:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 16:34 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 02:09 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 06:19 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 11:43 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-07 15:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 15:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 16:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 18:18 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-08 08:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-08 08:53 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 08:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 11:13 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-08 18:50 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 16:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-08 19:47 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 18:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-08 21:27 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 07:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-09 17:44 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:48 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 07:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 16:30 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 13:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 16:27 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:46 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 18:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 21:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 22:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2017-07-11 19:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 02:24 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 20:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-12 07:28 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-07-12 12:43 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 07:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 20:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 20:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:47 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 15:32 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 16:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 05:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 21:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-13 20:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:22 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-14 11:55 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-07-13 08:01 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:03 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:50 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 12:53 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 17:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 16:15 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-16 15:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 17:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 09:06 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:23 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 17:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-17 09:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-12 04:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:04 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:48 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 06:50 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 05:51 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 02:55 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 15:34 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 16:24 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:36 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 06:40 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-16 16:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:02 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:32 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-18 21:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:08 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 06:23 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 03:35 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 05:56 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 10:18 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-20 11:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 20:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 16:40 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-07-20 17:04 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-21 12:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 19:15 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-07-20 17:25 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 17:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 20:43 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 20:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-21 07:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 11:33 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:39 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:02 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:03 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 09:43 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-13 09:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 10:58 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:18 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-14 13:59 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:55 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:04 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:12 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 03:13 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 07:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 12:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 20:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 19:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 04:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 12:59 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:13 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 01:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 03:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:52 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 01:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:57 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:06 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 14:06 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 04:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:33 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 16:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 21:27 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 22:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 10:35 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:46 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 22:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 21:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:38 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 20:26 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 20:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 22:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 00:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 04:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 06:34 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 16:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 17:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:42 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 08:00 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:24 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:30 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 13:21 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-14 09:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 12:04 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 12:05 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-16 10:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 10:46 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 06:48 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:59 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:28 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:32 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 19:38 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:55 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 12:25 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-07-11 13:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 19:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:33 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 03:29 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 01:22 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 05:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 00:40 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:53 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:56 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 23:06 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 17:31 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:47 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 22:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2017-07-07 13:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-05 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 20:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:15 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 06:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-07-03 18:35 -0800
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:38 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:13 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 08:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 22:15 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2017-07-10 10:43 +0300
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 06:55 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-10 21:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. kevin93 <kevin@whitedigs.com> - 2017-07-10 21:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 13:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 15:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 14:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:01 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:26 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:40 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 17:22 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 19:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 21:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 15:47 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:05 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:25 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 15:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 20:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-12 17:53 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 11:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 04:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. kevin93 <kevin@whitedigs.com> - 2017-07-13 02:57 -0700
Page 11 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 19 Next page →
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 19:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jcmimcdkg688slm7emfeacqp0uk96k9tiv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468531 |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:12:56 -0700, Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >krw@notreal.com wrote: > >>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:19:36 -0700, Fred J. McCall >><fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell >>>><david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>>>>> Star Trek reruns. >>>>>> >>>>>Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >>>>>what you think. >>>> >>>>You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at >>>>least the tiniest fuck what he thinks. >>>> >>> >>>One needn't give a fuck what someone thinks in order to recognize >>>their outbursts as worthy of derision. >> >>You obviously care enough to answer. As stupid as you are, you have >>to see that much. >> > >Go back under your bridge and mope, twat. You really don't have to advertise your intelligence. We got it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 09:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1oudnUnUnYDTGfXEnZ2dnUU78dfNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #468344 |
krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:50:39 +0100, David Mitchell > <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>> >>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>> >>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>> Star Trek reruns. >>> >> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >> what you think. > > You're reading his posts and answering. Apparently _you_ give at > least the tiniest fuck what he thinks. Good point, but since I think he's wrong about everything, it's not really about him, more about the wider points being made.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 09:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <_sCdnSJ0HZV36PrEnZ2dnUU7-e3NnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #468074 |
"David Mitchell" wrote in message news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... > >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>> >>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >> >> Could you be any more vague? > >Yes. Yes I could. > >Things. People will make things. All of the things. I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need a few major mainframes. Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. -- Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/ CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net IT Disaster Response - https://www.amazon.com/Disaster-Response-Lessons-Learned-Field/dp/1484221834/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 17:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nonk3e-pk9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468222 |
In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: > "David Mitchell" wrote in message > news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >> >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>> >>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>> >>> Could you be any more vague? >> >>Yes. Yes I could. >> >>Things. People will make things. All of the things. > > I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal > computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need > a few major mainframes. Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. > Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing > parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of > things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no > one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. How many people do you know that own 3D printers? I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. > Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to > 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at > such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, > more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tabbypurr@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 10:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8554620e-9fd5-4a5c-8394-fc558fb0a1ab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468284 |
On Thursday, 13 July 2017 18:46:09 UTC+1, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: > > "David Mitchell" wrote in message > > news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... > >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>Things. People will make things. All of the things. > > > > I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal > > computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need > > a few major mainframes. > > Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart > phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. which are obviously personal computers. Total number of people using PCs is very much rising. > > Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing > > parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of > > things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no > > one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. > > How many people do you know that own 3D printers? > > I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, > drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. fairly immaterial to what the future holds. It's like saying 'how many people do you know own a TV' in 1939. > > Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to > > 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at > > such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, > > more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. > > Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. I have. And that statement of yours is a complete nonsequitur. NT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 21:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m46gmctkr0dvftpf74l7k193pm7pfic8g2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468284 |
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>> >>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>> >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>> >>>> Could you be any more vague? >>> >>>Yes. Yes I could. >>> >>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >> >> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >> a few major mainframes. > >Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't anything beyond the 3D printer. > >> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. > >How many people do you know that own 3D printers? I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that it made no business sense. >I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, >drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. > >> Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to >> 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at >> such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, >> more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. > >Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. +1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 02:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <39ml3e-bmc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468345 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>> >>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>> >>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>> >>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>> a few major mainframes. >> >>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. > > Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't > anything beyond the 3D printer. Like what, a 4D printer? Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: "Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >> >>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? > > I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was > going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that > it made no business sense. Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade 3D printers? >>I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, >>drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. >> >>> Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to >>> 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at >>> such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, >>> more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. >> >>Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. > > +1 -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 22:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <encgmcpot1hctn6c9ocdem3pktqu8v1rri@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468370 |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>> >>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>> >>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>> >>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>> >>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>> a few major mainframes. >>> >>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >> >> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >> anything beyond the 3D printer. > >Like what, a 4D printer? > >Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: > >"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." > >>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>> >>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >> >> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >> it made no business sense. > >Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >3D printers? So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? >>>I know about a dozen people that own things like welders, milling machines, >>>drill presses, and lathes but no one that owns a 3D printer. >>> >>>> Honestly, it's pretty damn presumptuous to claim that there's no future to >>>> 3D printing at home. I suspect 10-20 years from now we'll be laughing at >>>> such claims. Like computers, it will continue to improve. It'll get faster, >>>> more capable, capable of using more materials, etc. >>> >>>Since no one in this thread has made that claim, your post is nonsense. >> >> +1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 05:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <060m3e-lpd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468376 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>>> >>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>> >>>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>> >>>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>>> a few major mainframes. >>>> >>>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >>> >>> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >>> anything beyond the 3D printer. >> >>Like what, a 4D printer? >> >>Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: >> >>"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >> >>>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>>> >>>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >>> >>> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >>> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >>> it made no business sense. >> >>Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >>3D printers? > > So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? > Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? I think the likelyhood of everyone having a 3D printer is quite remote. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 13:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <596930BF.13D1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #468393 |
can you make a 3d printout with paper? so the surface contains rasied texture..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 17:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5cfimcthrnui172a00ll3e0jpb0349gs7c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468393 |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:07:44 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>>>> a few major mainframes. >>>>> >>>>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >>>> >>>> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >>>> anything beyond the 3D printer. >>> >>>Like what, a 4D printer? >>> >>>Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: >>> >>>"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >>> >>>>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>>>> >>>>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >>>> >>>> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >>>> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >>>> it made no business sense. >>> >>>Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >>>3D printers? >> >> So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? >> Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? > >I think the likelyhood of everyone having a 3D printer is quite remote. But that's the point of this thread. But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The world ends after "next"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 23:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <s32o3e-ksk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468509 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:07:44 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>>>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>>>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>>>>> a few major mainframes. >>>>>> >>>>>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>>>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >>>>> >>>>> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >>>>> anything beyond the 3D printer. >>>> >>>>Like what, a 4D printer? >>>> >>>>Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: >>>> >>>>"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >>>> >>>>>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>>>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>>>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>>>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>>>>> >>>>>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >>>>> >>>>> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >>>>> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >>>>> it made no business sense. >>>> >>>>Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >>>>3D printers? >>> >>> So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? >>> Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? >> >>I think the likelyhood of everyone having a 3D printer is quite remote. > > But that's the point of this thread. That was one of my points. The post that started all this was claiming people would be printing everything at home including cars; utter nonsense. > But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next > thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The > world ends after "next"? 3D printers are over 30 years old. "The world ends" is babble. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 23:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bi1jmcdk39rhid2pumolg1oo3fuhq1ducr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468548 |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:53:00 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:07:44 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>>>>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>>>>>> a few major mainframes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>>>>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >>>>>> >>>>>> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >>>>>> anything beyond the 3D printer. >>>>> >>>>>Like what, a 4D printer? >>>>> >>>>>Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: >>>>> >>>>>"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >>>>> >>>>>>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>>>>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>>>>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>>>>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >>>>>> >>>>>> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >>>>>> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >>>>>> it made no business sense. >>>>> >>>>>Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >>>>>3D printers? >>>> >>>> So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? >>>> Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? >>> >>>I think the likelyhood of everyone having a 3D printer is quite remote. >> >> But that's the point of this thread. > >That was one of my points. > >The post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >everything at home including cars; utter nonsense. You seem to think I'm disagreeing with you. > >> But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next >> thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The >> world ends after "next"? > >3D printers are over 30 years old. > >"The world ends" is babble. Let me make this simple for the simple. If 3D printers are "the next thing". Why is there not another "thing" beyond "the next thing"? End of the world?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 05:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5fko3e-5qm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468565 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:53:00 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:07:44 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>>>>>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>>>>>>> a few major mainframes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>>>>>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >>>>>>> anything beyond the 3D printer. >>>>>> >>>>>>Like what, a 4D printer? >>>>>> >>>>>>Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: >>>>>> >>>>>>"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>>>>>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>>>>>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>>>>>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >>>>>>> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >>>>>>> it made no business sense. >>>>>> >>>>>>Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >>>>>>3D printers? >>>>> >>>>> So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? >>>>> Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? >>>> >>>>I think the likelyhood of everyone having a 3D printer is quite remote. >>> >>> But that's the point of this thread. >> >>That was one of my points. >> >>The post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >>everything at home including cars; utter nonsense. > > You seem to think I'm disagreeing with you. That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing everything at home including cars? I don't see you saying anything about the post that started all this. >>> But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next >>> thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The >>> world ends after "next"? >> >>3D printers are over 30 years old. >> >>"The world ends" is babble. > > Let me make this simple for the simple. If 3D printers are "the next > thing". Why is there not another "thing" beyond "the next thing"? End > of the world? 3D printers are an old thing. Are you saying we will have Star Trek replicators? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 23:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fpcjmchmdseknevoj24vrpf5hoj7muve5d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468580 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>3D printers are an old thing.
>
Lots of things are around for a long time before they take hold and
mature.
>
>Are you saying we will have Star Trek replicators?
>
Were you frightened by tribbles when you were very young?
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 08:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <f64kmc19917rn7eu4oh7minbqna7mooeav@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468580 |
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 05:06:13 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:53:00 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:07:44 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:18:43 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:59 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "David Mitchell" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Yes. Yes I could. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I suspect 3D printing at home will be as successful as the personal >>>>>>>>>> computer. I mean everyone knows they're useless at home and we'll only need >>>>>>>>>> a few major mainframes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Personal computer use in the home is dropping with increased use of smart >>>>>>>>>phones for those important tasks such as posting on twitter and facebook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Banking and Amazon, too. Though that isn't to say that there isn't >>>>>>>> anything beyond the 3D printer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Like what, a 4D printer? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Of course the ultimate would be a genuine Star Trek replicator: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Computer a 1968 Gibson Les Paul Custom and a cup of Earl Grey, hot." >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Which reminds me, I need to tell my friends who own 3D printers and printing >>>>>>>>>> parts to fix things at homes, tools, and tool holders and all manner of >>>>>>>>>> things that I never would have thought of myself that they're wrong and no >>>>>>>>>> one will effectively use a 3D printer at home. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>How many people do you know that own 3D printers? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I know of none but we have several at work. One of my cow-orkers was >>>>>>>> going to buy one and use it as a side business but he figured out that >>>>>>>> it made no business sense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Could that be because custom machine shops have real industrial grade >>>>>>>3D printers? >>>>>> >>>>>> So you think that after everyone has a 3D printer, the world will end? >>>>>> Are you some sort of 3D Rastafarian, or something? >>>>> >>>>>I think the likelyhood of everyone having a 3D printer is quite remote. >>>> >>>> But that's the point of this thread. >>> >>>That was one of my points. >>> >>>The post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >>>everything at home including cars; utter nonsense. >> >> You seem to think I'm disagreeing with you. > >That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >everything at home including cars? That wasn't my claim! I've been arguing on your side of that silly proposition. > >I don't see you saying anything about the post that started all this. You're not looking. >>>> But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next >>>> thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The >>>> world ends after "next"? >>> >>>3D printers are over 30 years old. >>> >>>"The world ends" is babble. >> >> Let me make this simple for the simple. If 3D printers are "the next >> thing". Why is there not another "thing" beyond "the next thing"? End >> of the world? > >3D printers are an old thing. Woooosssshhhh! >Are you saying we will have Star Trek replicators? Do pay attention. <Wow!>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 17:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ce1q3e-ndr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468604 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 05:06:13 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: <snip> >>That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >>everything at home including cars? > > That wasn't my claim! I've been arguing on your side of that silly > proposition. What wasn't your claim? That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing everything at home including cars? The above is just a statement of fact. >>I don't see you saying anything about the post that started all this. > > You're not looking. > >>>>> But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next >>>>> thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The >>>>> world ends after "next"? >>>> >>>>3D printers are over 30 years old. >>>> >>>>"The world ends" is babble. >>> >>> Let me make this simple for the simple. If 3D printers are "the next >>> thing". Why is there not another "thing" beyond "the next thing"? End >>> of the world? >> >>3D printers are an old thing. > > Woooosssshhhh! > >>Are you saying we will have Star Trek replicators? > > Do pay attention. <Wow!> I never said 3D printers are "the next thing" nor do I believe that. The last "thing" in the manufacturing world was the industrial revolution which started in the late 18th century and became fully mature in the early 20th century. THAT changed the world. FYI I concider 3D printing to be little more than a refinement of Damascus steel, a process from the 3rd century. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tabbypurr@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 13:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <992b0f11-9cf4-4d2b-b909-6bd5b10e9d46@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468641 |
On Saturday, 15 July 2017 19:01:07 UTC+1, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > I never said 3D printers are "the next thing" nor do I believe that. > > The last "thing" in the manufacturing world was the industrial revolution > which started in the late 18th century and became fully mature in the > early 20th century. > > THAT changed the world. So you missed oil, electronics and electronic computers, cars, what else. > FYI I concider 3D printing to be little more than a refinement of Damascus > steel, a process from the 3rd century. Oookay. NT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 18:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4n4lmcd78mngbbk9luqgp3jmflrkpudfp7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468641 |
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:53:48 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 05:06:13 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > ><snip> > >>>That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >>>everything at home including cars? >> >> That wasn't my claim! I've been arguing on your side of that silly >> proposition. > >What wasn't your claim? You really can't read? I thought better of you. > >That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >everything at home including cars? Which I *completely* disagree with but for some reason you insist on arguing with someone who agrees with you. > >The above is just a statement of fact. > >>>I don't see you saying anything about the post that started all this. >> >> You're not looking. >> >>>>>> But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next >>>>>> thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The >>>>>> world ends after "next"? >>>>> >>>>>3D printers are over 30 years old. >>>>> >>>>>"The world ends" is babble. >>>> >>>> Let me make this simple for the simple. If 3D printers are "the next >>>> thing". Why is there not another "thing" beyond "the next thing"? End >>>> of the world? >>> >>>3D printers are an old thing. >> >> Woooosssshhhh! >> >>>Are you saying we will have Star Trek replicators? >> >> Do pay attention. <Wow!> > >I never said 3D printers are "the next thing" nor do I believe that. Try reading for comprehension. > >The last "thing" in the manufacturing world was the industrial revolution >which started in the late 18th century and became fully mature in the >early 20th century. > >THAT changed the world. > >FYI I concider 3D printing to be little more than a refinement of Damascus >steel, a process from the 3rd century. Oh, good grief.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 02:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jcuq3e-ic1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468707 |
In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:53:48 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 05:06:13 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >>>>everything at home including cars? >>> >>> That wasn't my claim! I've been arguing on your side of that silly >>> proposition. >> >>What wasn't your claim? > > You really can't read? I thought better of you. Well thanks but I'm having problems parsing extactly what it is you are agreeing with an what you are disagreeing with. >>That the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing >>everything at home including cars? > > Which I *completely* disagree with but for some reason you insist on > arguing with someone who agrees with you. OK, fine, we both agree that the post that started all this was claiming people would be printing everything at home including cars. >>The above is just a statement of fact. >> >>>>I don't see you saying anything about the post that started all this. >>> >>> You're not looking. >>> >>>>>>> But let me put it another way.... If 3D printers are the "next >>>>>>> thing", are you saying that there can't be any "next, next thing"? The >>>>>>> world ends after "next"? >>>>>> >>>>>>3D printers are over 30 years old. >>>>>> >>>>>>"The world ends" is babble. >>>>> >>>>> Let me make this simple for the simple. If 3D printers are "the next >>>>> thing". Why is there not another "thing" beyond "the next thing"? End >>>>> of the world? >>>> >>>>3D printers are an old thing. >>> >>> Woooosssshhhh! >>> >>>>Are you saying we will have Star Trek replicators? >>> >>> Do pay attention. <Wow!> >> >>I never said 3D printers are "the next thing" nor do I believe that. > > Try reading for comprehension. OK, what part of I never said 3D printers are "the next thing" nor do I believe that do you have an issue with? >>The last "thing" in the manufacturing world was the industrial revolution >>which started in the late 18th century and became fully mature in the >>early 20th century. >> >>THAT changed the world. >> >>FYI I concider 3D printing to be little more than a refinement of Damascus >>steel, a process from the 3rd century. > > Oh, good grief. So what is the essential diffence between Damascus steel and 3D printing? Both take chunks of a base material and fuse the chunks into a bigger object. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web