Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #466689 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-07-13 02:57 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 379 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-03 08:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. leongdentalsf@gmail.com - 2017-07-03 06:23 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. leongdentalsf@gmail.com - 2017-07-03 06:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:26 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 11:09 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-03 09:54 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-03 18:02 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-03 16:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-04 12:10 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 11:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-07-05 13:49 +1000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 21:31 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-07-05 16:03 +1000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 17:04 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 14:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 18:28 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-03 20:57 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-03 14:57 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 16:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 00:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 02:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-04 21:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-05 08:52 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 23:30 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:35 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-07 08:03 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:09 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:08 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-04 09:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-04 18:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 20:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 07:20 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-05 08:54 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 18:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 23:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-05 17:27 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-06 06:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 16:34 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 02:09 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 06:19 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 11:43 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-07 15:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 15:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 16:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-07 18:18 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-08 08:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-07-08 08:53 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 08:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 17:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 11:13 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-08 18:50 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 16:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-08 19:47 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-08 18:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-08 21:27 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 07:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-09 17:44 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:48 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 07:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 16:30 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:49 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 13:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 16:27 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:46 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 18:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:20 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-11 21:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-11 22:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2017-07-11 19:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 02:24 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 20:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 18:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-12 07:28 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-07-12 12:43 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 07:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 20:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 20:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:47 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 15:32 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 16:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 05:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:45 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 21:29 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-13 20:27 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:22 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-14 11:55 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-07-13 08:01 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:03 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:50 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:02 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 12:53 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 17:55 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 16:15 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-16 15:21 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 17:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 09:06 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:23 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 15:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 17:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-17 09:46 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 13:04 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-12 04:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:04 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:48 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 06:50 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 05:51 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 02:55 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:51 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 15:34 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 16:24 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:36 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:27 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 06:40 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-16 16:02 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:02 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-17 20:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:32 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-18 21:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:08 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 06:23 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 03:35 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 05:56 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 10:18 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-20 11:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 20:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 16:40 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-07-20 17:04 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-21 12:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-20 19:15 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-07-20 17:25 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 17:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 20:43 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 20:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-21 07:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-20 16:24 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:26 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 11:33 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:39 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:02 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:03 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:19 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:12 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 19:54 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 09:43 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-13 09:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 10:58 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 21:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:18 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-13 22:59 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 05:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-14 13:59 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 17:55 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 23:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-14 23:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 23:17 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:57 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 17:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:04 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:12 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:07 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 03:13 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 07:14 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:11 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 12:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-14 20:09 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 19:08 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 04:00 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 08:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 12:59 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:13 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 01:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 03:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:52 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 01:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 06:57 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 13:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:06 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 14:06 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 20:29 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 04:05 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-15 00:33 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 16:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 21:27 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 22:30 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:07 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 07:16 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 10:35 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:13 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:33 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 06:11 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:46 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 22:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 21:53 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 06:38 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 20:26 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 20:12 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 22:12 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 00:49 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 05:30 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 04:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 06:34 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-19 16:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 17:24 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-19 20:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:42 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 08:00 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:14 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:24 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:30 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-16 13:21 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-14 09:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 17:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-14 12:04 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:10 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-16 09:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 12:05 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:15 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2017-07-16 10:56 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:19 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-19 02:15 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 10:46 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 06:48 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:19 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-05 16:59 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 11:11 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:11 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 19:28 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:32 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 19:38 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:55 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 12:25 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-07-11 13:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:44 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 19:52 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:33 +0100
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 03:29 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 01:22 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 22:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 05:06 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-06 21:36 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 05:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-07 20:25 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-08 00:40 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:53 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 21:56 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 23:06 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:38 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 17:31 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 12:47 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 18:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 22:35 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2017-07-07 13:41 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-05 17:47 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2017-07-05 08:20 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-04 20:04 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 20:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-05 21:15 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 06:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-07-03 18:35 -0800
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:01 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 13:38 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:16 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:13 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 08:35 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-09 22:15 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2017-07-10 10:43 +0300
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 06:55 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-07-10 21:32 -0600
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. kevin93 <kevin@whitedigs.com> - 2017-07-10 21:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-10 12:39 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:21 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 13:14 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 15:34 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 14:03 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:22 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 17:01 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-09 12:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:26 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 16:10 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 17:40 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-10 17:22 -0500
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-10 19:49 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2017-07-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-13 21:42 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 15:47 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-14 02:05 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2017-07-13 23:25 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 10:58 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 17:54 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 15:18 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 20:00 +0000
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-07-12 17:53 -0700
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-12 11:42 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-13 04:17 -0400
Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed electric cars. kevin93 <kevin@whitedigs.com> - 2017-07-13 02:57 -0700
Page 8 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 19 Next page →
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 15:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bipnmct0h614sdp5ogaa4899phfv1mlnjg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468907 |
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:32:10 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>Nothing from a 1988 Ford F150 would even "plug into" a Ford F150 bought today. >> >>BTW, a current Ford F150 costs about the same (in adjusted dollars) as a >>1988 Ford F150 and does not perform significantly differently. > >Lug nuts. Maybe whole wheels. Antifreeze. Gasoline (so long as we >stay this side of 1972 or so.) Does Ford still use a different tranny >fluid than everyone else like they did in the seventies? > >Are modern "power points" heat resistant enough to take an old >cigarette lighter? > >Has the trailer ball hitch changed since WW2? I realize that "hidden >hitch" sockets are a newer idea, but the old trailers can still be >"plugged in". You might need an adapter for the lights on the >trailer. > >The controls have stayed remarkably steady. You've got the PRNDL >tranny setting, probably using a lever identical to the one thirty >years ago. You've got the steering wheel and two pedals. Crankshaft, pistons, rings, spark plugs, poppet valves, gears. Hasn't changed much in over a century. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 22:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4d7t3e-5f9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468922 |
In sci.physics John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:32:10 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: > >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>Nothing from a 1988 Ford F150 would even "plug into" a Ford F150 bought today. >>> >>>BTW, a current Ford F150 costs about the same (in adjusted dollars) as a >>>1988 Ford F150 and does not perform significantly differently. >> >>Lug nuts. Maybe whole wheels. Antifreeze. Gasoline (so long as we >>stay this side of 1972 or so.) Does Ford still use a different tranny >>fluid than everyone else like they did in the seventies? >> >>Are modern "power points" heat resistant enough to take an old >>cigarette lighter? >> >>Has the trailer ball hitch changed since WW2? I realize that "hidden >>hitch" sockets are a newer idea, but the old trailers can still be >>"plugged in". You might need an adapter for the lights on the >>trailer. >> >>The controls have stayed remarkably steady. You've got the PRNDL >>tranny setting, probably using a lever identical to the one thirty >>years ago. You've got the steering wheel and two pedals. > > Crankshaft, pistons, rings, spark plugs, poppet valves, gears. Hasn't > changed much in over a century. Try taking any of those from a 1988 Ford F150 and installing them on a current Ford F150. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 17:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mmunmclsbbaoceiqhv0ijgmqk2u59te76h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468922 |
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:32:10 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote:
>
>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>Nothing from a 1988 Ford F150 would even "plug into" a Ford F150 bought today.
>>>
>>>BTW, a current Ford F150 costs about the same (in adjusted dollars) as a
>>>1988 Ford F150 and does not perform significantly differently.
>>
>>Lug nuts. Maybe whole wheels. Antifreeze. Gasoline (so long as we
>>stay this side of 1972 or so.) Does Ford still use a different tranny
>>fluid than everyone else like they did in the seventies?
>>
>>Are modern "power points" heat resistant enough to take an old
>>cigarette lighter?
>>
>>Has the trailer ball hitch changed since WW2? I realize that "hidden
>>hitch" sockets are a newer idea, but the old trailers can still be
>>"plugged in". You might need an adapter for the lights on the
>>trailer.
>>
>>The controls have stayed remarkably steady. You've got the PRNDL
>>tranny setting, probably using a lever identical to the one thirty
>>years ago. You've got the steering wheel and two pedals.
>>
>
>Crankshaft, pistons, rings, spark plugs, poppet valves, gears. Hasn't
>changed much in over a century.
>
Actually, other than cosmetics, the bulk of the change tends to be in
engines. Look at performance now vs performance then. My 1985
Corvette with a big V-8 did 0-60 is 6-ish seconds, a 15 second quarter
mile at 91 MPH, and had a top speed of 150 MPH. It was the fasted
mass produced car of its day. My current car (BMW 435i with a small
straight six) does 0-60 in 5.2 seconds or so, a 13.7 second quarter
mile at 102 MPH, and a governed top speed of 155 MPH. The BMW handily
beats the old 'Vette and it isn't even considered a performance car
these days.
--
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore,
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
--George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 09:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okig9f$sf7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #468946 |
On 7/16/2017 7:00 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: > John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:32:10 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>> Nothing from a 1988 Ford F150 would even "plug into" a Ford F150 bought today. >>>> >>>> BTW, a current Ford F150 costs about the same (in adjusted dollars) as a >>>> 1988 Ford F150 and does not perform significantly differently. >>> >>> Lug nuts. Maybe whole wheels. Antifreeze. Gasoline (so long as we >>> stay this side of 1972 or so.) Does Ford still use a different tranny >>> fluid than everyone else like they did in the seventies? >>> >>> Are modern "power points" heat resistant enough to take an old >>> cigarette lighter? >>> >>> Has the trailer ball hitch changed since WW2? I realize that "hidden >>> hitch" sockets are a newer idea, but the old trailers can still be >>> "plugged in". You might need an adapter for the lights on the >>> trailer. >>> >>> The controls have stayed remarkably steady. You've got the PRNDL >>> tranny setting, probably using a lever identical to the one thirty >>> years ago. You've got the steering wheel and two pedals. >>> >> >> Crankshaft, pistons, rings, spark plugs, poppet valves, gears. Hasn't >> changed much in over a century. >> > > Actually, other than cosmetics, the bulk of the change tends to be in > engines. Look at performance now vs performance then. My 1985 > Corvette with a big V-8 did 0-60 is 6-ish seconds, a 15 second quarter > mile at 91 MPH, and had a top speed of 150 MPH. It was the fasted > mass produced car of its day. My current car (BMW 435i with a small > straight six) does 0-60 in 5.2 seconds or so, a 13.7 second quarter > mile at 102 MPH, and a governed top speed of 155 MPH. The BMW handily > beats the old 'Vette and it isn't even considered a performance car > these days. > > Mustangs - V8 1993 240HP gas mileage 18 on highway (I put a supercharger on this one to get to 330HP, too scary for the wife, +others, a muscle car) Now 2015 Mustang V8 makes 427Hp and gets good gas milage 26 on highway, and it is a nice ride, a sports car.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 20:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <52lqmc1fd0rtgjl1fg7ghkmukai0q1770n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #469005 |
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:06:37 -0500, Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 7/16/2017 7:00 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >> John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:32:10 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >>> >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nothing from a 1988 Ford F150 would even "plug into" a Ford F150 bought today. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, a current Ford F150 costs about the same (in adjusted dollars) as a >>>>> 1988 Ford F150 and does not perform significantly differently. >>>> >>>> Lug nuts. Maybe whole wheels. Antifreeze. Gasoline (so long as we >>>> stay this side of 1972 or so.) Does Ford still use a different tranny >>>> fluid than everyone else like they did in the seventies? >>>> >>>> Are modern "power points" heat resistant enough to take an old >>>> cigarette lighter? >>>> >>>> Has the trailer ball hitch changed since WW2? I realize that "hidden >>>> hitch" sockets are a newer idea, but the old trailers can still be >>>> "plugged in". You might need an adapter for the lights on the >>>> trailer. >>>> >>>> The controls have stayed remarkably steady. You've got the PRNDL >>>> tranny setting, probably using a lever identical to the one thirty >>>> years ago. You've got the steering wheel and two pedals. >>>> >>> >>> Crankshaft, pistons, rings, spark plugs, poppet valves, gears. Hasn't >>> changed much in over a century. >>> >> >> Actually, other than cosmetics, the bulk of the change tends to be in >> engines. Look at performance now vs performance then. My 1985 >> Corvette with a big V-8 did 0-60 is 6-ish seconds, a 15 second quarter >> mile at 91 MPH, and had a top speed of 150 MPH. It was the fasted >> mass produced car of its day. My current car (BMW 435i with a small >> straight six) does 0-60 in 5.2 seconds or so, a 13.7 second quarter >> mile at 102 MPH, and a governed top speed of 155 MPH. The BMW handily >> beats the old 'Vette and it isn't even considered a performance car >> these days. >> >> > >Mustangs - V8 1993 240HP gas mileage 18 on highway (I put a >supercharger on this one to get to 330HP, too scary for the wife, >+others, a muscle car) My 65YO wife's 2014 6-cylinder 300HP Mustang isn't too much for her. ;-) >Now 2015 Mustang V8 makes 427Hp and gets good gas milage 26 on highway, >and it is a nice ride, a sports car. She likes driving hers with her top down (and often skirt up). I worry about her scaring little children. ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 15:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <et242cF5796U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #468876 |
Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >Bullshit. The technology in a PC today is quite different than that of >a PC made in 1988. Nothing in a PC from 1988 would even "plug into" a >PC bought today, except maybe the keyboard and mouse. And the PC today >is literally orders of magnitude faster. The original mice I first saw plugged into a special jack on a card that plugged into the PC. I had mine on a combo card with video. The technology to allow a mouse to run on the low power in a serial connection came later. And serial connectors vanished around Y2K. I don't know how the data signals in the PS2 mouse connectors compared to the 9 pin serial connectors. Keyboards plugged into a large DIN connection. This was gradually replaced by the smaller PS2 connection, then again with USB connections. I don't know if any desktop computers still provide PS2 connectors. I don't think so. I'm still using my 1994 laser printer. It plugs into a centronics-parallel to USB adapter. I guess similar adapters are available for serial ports and PS2 connectors. Hmmm, come to think of it, the Centronics port was designed for the 1988 TRS-80 computer. A printer from that era would probably plug through my adapter into any modern Windows computer. And at least the MX-80 and its clones are probably still driver-supported. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 17:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.33d5a70ece5941b1989993@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #468903 |
In article <et242cF5796U1@mid.individual.net>, gossg@gossg.org says... > > Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > > >Bullshit. The technology in a PC today is quite different than that of > >a PC made in 1988. Nothing in a PC from 1988 would even "plug into" a > >PC bought today, except maybe the keyboard and mouse. And the PC today > >is literally orders of magnitude faster. > > The original mice I first saw plugged into a special jack on a card > that plugged into the PC. I had mine on a combo card with video. The > technology to allow a mouse to run on the low power in a serial > connection came later. And serial connectors vanished around Y2K. I > don't know how the data signals in the PS2 mouse connectors compared > to the 9 pin serial connectors. > > Keyboards plugged into a large DIN connection. This was gradually > replaced by the smaller PS2 connection, then again with USB > connections. > > I don't know if any desktop computers still provide PS2 connectors. I > don't think so. Some desktop computers I've seen recently still have the smaller PS2 connectors for a keyboard and mouse. All of our "professional" machines at work have them. For example, the HP Z240 Desktop "tower" computer has them. All you need to go from the old DIN keyboard connection to a PS2 keyboard connector is a simple, non-active, adapter. Ought to cost about $0.99 on eBay. > I'm still using my 1994 laser printer. It plugs into a > centronics-parallel to USB adapter. I guess similar adapters are > available for serial ports and PS2 connectors. Not sure any active adapters do that, but some older mice would work with either with a passive adapter. At any rate, you can buy USB to serial port adapters. I have one. It works well. > Hmmm, come to think of it, the Centronics port was designed for the > 1988 TRS-80 computer. A printer from that era would probably plug > through my adapter into any modern Windows computer. And at least the > MX-80 and its clones are probably still driver-supported. Software drivers are tricky, but yes the USB adapter will allow the electronics to communicate. Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 09:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8OKdnfkKhLkoIvHEnZ2dnUU7-TPNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #468911 |
Jeff Findley wrote:
> In article <et242cF5796U1@mid.individual.net>, gossg@gossg.org says...
>>
>> Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Bullshit. The technology in a PC today is quite different than that of
>>> a PC made in 1988. Nothing in a PC from 1988 would even "plug into" a
>>> PC bought today, except maybe the keyboard and mouse. And the PC today
>>> is literally orders of magnitude faster.
>>
>> The original mice I first saw plugged into a special jack on a card
>> that plugged into the PC. I had mine on a combo card with video. The
>> technology to allow a mouse to run on the low power in a serial
>> connection came later. And serial connectors vanished around Y2K. I
>> don't know how the data signals in the PS2 mouse connectors compared
>> to the 9 pin serial connectors.
>>
>> Keyboards plugged into a large DIN connection. This was gradually
>> replaced by the smaller PS2 connection, then again with USB
>> connections.
>>
>> I don't know if any desktop computers still provide PS2 connectors. I
>> don't think so.
>
> Some desktop computers I've seen recently still have the smaller PS2
> connectors for a keyboard and mouse. All of our "professional" machines
> at work have them. For example, the HP Z240 Desktop "tower" computer
> has them. All you need to go from the old DIN keyboard connection to a
> PS2 keyboard connector is a simple, non-active, adapter. Ought to cost
> about $0.99 on eBay.
The PC/XT keyboard didn't work on the 286/AT machines because the
baud rate was different. Heath/Zenith used a baud rate that wasn't
compatible with either standard. I still have a couple keyboards with
the XT/AT switch on the bottom.
>> I'm still using my 1994 laser printer. It plugs into a
>> centronics-parallel to USB adapter. I guess similar adapters are
>> available for serial ports and PS2 connectors.
>
> Not sure any active adapters do that, but some older mice would work
> with either with a passive adapter. At any rate, you can buy USB to
> serial port adapters. I have one. It works well.
>
>> Hmmm, come to think of it, the Centronics port was designed for the
>> 1988 TRS-80 computer. A printer from that era would probably plug
>> through my adapter into any modern Windows computer. And at least >> the MX-80 and its clones are probably still driver-supported.
The Centronics port was to allow use f existing printers that were
built for minicomputers. There was a huge surplus market for both RS232
and Centronics used printers in the early Personal computer days.
> Software drivers are tricky, but yes the USB adapter will allow the
> electronics to communicate.
>
> Jeff
>
--
Never piss off an Engineer!
They don't get mad.
They don't get even.
They go for over unity! ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 22:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o65t3e-t59.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468903 |
In sci.physics Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: > Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > >>Bullshit. The technology in a PC today is quite different than that of >>a PC made in 1988. Nothing in a PC from 1988 would even "plug into" a >>PC bought today, except maybe the keyboard and mouse. And the PC today >>is literally orders of magnitude faster. > > The original mice I first saw plugged into a special jack on a card > that plugged into the PC. I had mine on a combo card with video. The > technology to allow a mouse to run on the low power in a serial > connection came later. And serial connectors vanished around Y2K. I > don't know how the data signals in the PS2 mouse connectors compared > to the 9 pin serial connectors. > > Keyboards plugged into a large DIN connection. This was gradually > replaced by the smaller PS2 connection, then again with USB > connections. > > I don't know if any desktop computers still provide PS2 connectors. I > don't think so. > > I'm still using my 1994 laser printer. It plugs into a > centronics-parallel to USB adapter. I guess similar adapters are > available for serial ports and PS2 connectors. > > Hmmm, come to think of it, the Centronics port was designed for the > 1988 TRS-80 computer. A printer from that era would probably plug > through my adapter into any modern Windows computer. And at least the > MX-80 and its clones are probably still driver-supported. Not quite. The Centronics connector, also known as IEEE 1284, was designed by Centronics in the 1970's as a general parallel port interface. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 13:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qfanmch869tqp9smh8kutb2vjr4cb7vacq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468776 |
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 09:51:19 -0400, Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > ... Today, you can comfortably run CAD/CAE software (at least the > CAE pre/post) on a sub $2k PC running Windows OS. Confirmed. I've sat and watched my brother transform a mass of equations first into logic circuitry, then into a program for a PAL, on Mom's desktop computer. Granted she had a pretty good computer, but this was twelve or fourteen years ago. -- Goat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tabbypurr@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 04:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2428ab65-8557-492e-ada1-1879e49cb755@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468021 |
On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 23:16:09 UTC+1, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall > > <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? > >>>> > >>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. > >>> > >>>Could you be any more vague? > >>> > >> > >>"Vague"? Do you not know what jewelry and such are? > > > > Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry? Plastic jewelry? ...or are > > you going to print gold? BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened > > steel and water companies, too. > > I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage > girls. If the printer can do it, it will happen. Mr & Mrs Random own a piece of gold jewellery, but would rather have something different. They can wade through Hatton Garden, buy what they want at full retail and get scrap value for their existing gold, or can reprint it using a design chosen online without losing $1000, paying $10-$100 to use the design. Not too hard to see which wins. > I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company. mmkay > Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless. maybe in your world. I'm not convinced many 3d printed tools will be good, but who knows. NT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 07:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5mdnSw3tNBsJvjEnZ2dnUU78S_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #467968 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >> >> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. > > Could you be any more vague? Yes. Yes I could. Things. People will make things. All of the things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 17:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <404i3e-7r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468074 |
In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>> >>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >> >> Could you be any more vague? > > Yes. Yes I could. > > Things. People will make things. All of the things. Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching Star Trek reruns. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 06:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ctWdnQLM9fWtl_rEnZ2dnUU78d2dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #468113 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>> >>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>> >>> Could you be any more vague? >> >> Yes. Yes I could. >> >> Things. People will make things. All of the things. > > Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching > Star Trek reruns. > Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks what you think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-13 17:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o8nk3e-pk9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468181 |
In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>> >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>> >>>> Could you be any more vague? >>> >>> Yes. Yes I could. >>> >>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >> >> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >> Star Trek reruns. >> > Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks > what you think. It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent the average person. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 05:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <WP6dnT9WCo5w0PXEnZ2dnUU78V_NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #468282 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>> >>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>> >>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>> >>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>> >>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>> Star Trek reruns. >>> >> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >> what you think. > > It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent > the average person. I think you need to find a better insult - "techno nerd" is a bit tautologous - and I've never made any particular claim to represent anyone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 05:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0d0m3e-lpd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #468390 |
In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you be any more vague? >>>>> >>>>> Yes. Yes I could. >>>>> >>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >>>> >>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >>>> Star Trek reruns. >>>> >>> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >>> what you think. >> >> It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent >> the average person. > > I think you need to find a better insult - "techno nerd" is a bit tautologous - > and I've never made any particular claim to represent anyone. How about pie-in-the-sky dreamer? Like I've said before, most people can't be bothered to make things as trivial as bread and biscuits. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tabbypurr@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 02:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <38c0218a-0b3f-4c72-8119-f2be24c2b9a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468394 |
On Friday, 14 July 2017 06:31:14 UTC+1, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. > >>>> > >>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching > >>>> Star Trek reruns. > >>>> > >>> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks > >>> what you think. > >> > >> It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent > >> the average person. > > > > I think you need to find a better insult - "techno nerd" is a bit tautologous - > > and I've never made any particular claim to represent anyone. > > How about pie-in-the-sky dreamer? > > Like I've said before, most people can't be bothered to make things as > trivial as bread and biscuits. Yet another duff argument. Making bread & biscuits takes time & effort. Future 3d printing won't. NT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@notreal.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 17:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p6fimclhfkcvo1vq477au3gv003gbv2ile@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #468406 |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:55:10 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote: >On Friday, 14 July 2017 06:31:14 UTC+1, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. >> >>>> >> >>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching >> >>>> Star Trek reruns. >> >>>> >> >>> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks >> >>> what you think. >> >> >> >> It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent >> >> the average person. >> > >> > I think you need to find a better insult - "techno nerd" is a bit tautologous - >> > and I've never made any particular claim to represent anyone. >> >> How about pie-in-the-sky dreamer? >> >> Like I've said before, most people can't be bothered to make things as >> trivial as bread and biscuits. > >Yet another duff argument. Making bread & biscuits takes time & effort. Future 3d printing won't. Nonsense. CAD alone, is a lot of work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tabbypurr@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 15:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f7f5ec29-5a73-4957-baf3-af3c9f71e0d1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468507 |
On Friday, 14 July 2017 22:51:58 UTC+1, k...@notreal.com wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:55:10 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr wrote: > >On Friday, 14 July 2017 06:31:14 UTC+1, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >>>> In sci.physics David Mitchell <david.robot.mitchell@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> >>>>> Things. People will make things. All of the things. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Great, yet another techno nerd weenie who spends way too much time watching > >> >>>> Star Trek reruns. > >> >>>> > >> >>> Bless. It's almost as though you imagine anyone give even the tinest of fucks > >> >>> what you think. > >> >> > >> >> It's almost as though you imagine I think puerile techno nerds represent > >> >> the average person. > >> > > >> > I think you need to find a better insult - "techno nerd" is a bit tautologous - > >> > and I've never made any particular claim to represent anyone. > >> > >> How about pie-in-the-sky dreamer? > >> > >> Like I've said before, most people can't be bothered to make things as > >> trivial as bread and biscuits. > > > >Yet another duff argument. Making bread & biscuits takes time & effort. Future 3d printing won't. > > Nonsense. CAD alone, is a lot of work. Maybe it passed you by, but one can download lots of 3d designs, skipping the entire CAD cycle. As 3d gets better there will be more people creating more designs. Who knows if they'll be free or pay per use. NT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web