Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #519135
| From | <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: tiny board |
| Date | 2018-10-13 06:59 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pps54m$ora$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <h7esrdl6ni0gbf3m0iutjn6uambclocetc@4ax.com> <ppliub$hb4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <l7ksrdt7ur1k4br3hh1mdb864f81m8ovn9@4ax.com> <ppqna4$q0c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <vtu1sdp2439fdj9qhut00n6n5d2gded37l@4ax.com> |
John Larkin wrote >>>On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:12:10 GMT, <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> >>>>Been coding a Linux test program for the LMX2332 PLL chip, >>>>very hard to read datasheet, >>>>could not register on TI site to download their windows program, >>>>so writing my own. >>> >>>We had to develop c code to drive the LMX2571 synth chip. It has a 62 >>>page data sheet and about 4000 registers, and involves all sorts of >>>rules and number-theory stuff. >>> >>>TI wasn't any help. They obviously have procedures to go from >>>frequency to register settings, and they obviously have c code in >>>their eval kits, and they refused to let us see any of that. >> >>I have the software framework running now, hard to find test vectors, >>but one thing bugs me in this chip: >>there is one output pin that seems multiplexed to show different signals in the chip, >>like outputs from different dividers etc... >>But in the control registers you can set bits that connect more than one signal >>at the same time to that pin. >> >>So in theory it seems you can destroy the chip by sending the wrong config data. >>That is very bad chip design IMO. >> >>Maybe there is some protection, but then the datasheet is wrong. >>So I added a software abort in case the wrong bits are set. > >There have been some chips, like FPGAs, that could literally be fried >by software mis-configuration, but that's very rare. If the mux is >mis-programmed, it's unlikely that any damage would be done. Yes, the FPGA oscillating over a few gates really heats it up, causes hot spots! Been there, done that, but it did survive. In the LMX2332 datasheet I do not see any power on states of the configuration registers specified either. Better have a current limiting resistor in the supply I think...
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
tiny board John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2018-10-09 20:22 -0700
Re: tiny board <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> - 2018-10-10 06:30 +0000
Re: tiny board tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 02:39 -0700
Re: tiny board <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> - 2018-10-10 14:08 +0000
Re: tiny board tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 08:34 -0700
Re: tiny board DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2018-10-10 09:54 +0000
Re: tiny board John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2018-10-10 07:43 -0700
Re: tiny board John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2018-10-10 11:12 -0700
Re: tiny board <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> - 2018-10-10 19:12 +0000
Re: tiny board John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2018-10-10 12:26 -0700
Re: tiny board <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> - 2018-10-12 17:57 +0000
Re: tiny board John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2018-10-12 12:55 -0700
Re: tiny board <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> - 2018-10-13 06:59 +0000
Re: tiny board John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2018-10-13 08:54 -0700
Re: tiny board <698839253X6D445TD@nospam.org> - 2018-10-13 18:19 +0000
Re: tiny board George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2018-10-10 06:40 -0700
Re: tiny board John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2018-10-10 07:38 -0700
csiph-web