Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #518935
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals |
| Organization | JJ's own news server |
| Message-ID | <ppmn9f$4ia$1@gonzo.alcatraz> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <FLqvD.233458$3L2.99943@fx44.iad> <negsrdd8ofre09d9tpqspnn2sm011kqa4g@4ax.com> <iusvD.181091$lM2.14229@fx39.iad> <341e6f4d-ff55-422c-8d18-5ece7650f10a@googlegroups.com> <v0rsrdpfhggce3ihg19p726mk3s81795m6@4ax.com> |
| Date | 2018-10-11 05:32 +0000 |
On 2018-10-10, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT), jurb6006@gmail.com wrote: > >>>"If I were to read say the Second Amendment in my own strict-textualist interpretation of it: >> >>>'"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." " >> >>My opinion is probably similar, I add caveeats to it, but very minor ones. >> >>It is obvious that say nuclear weapons should not be allowed in cities. some cities even in the old west had laws where you had to turn in your guns to the sheriff until you leave, but that was because of paper thin walls and the fact that bullets could go through them. I don't want to argue that particular point , back to the nukes. >> >>We need to define arms. I think the best way to do that is that in this context arms for us means arms for the government.; They will not nuke their own country, they will not use poison NBCs. So let that be the limitation, anything they would use on us. they got full automatics, we got full automatics. they got armor piercing round, we got them. They got vests, we got them. We got gas masks so do we. they got tear gas, your guess. Actually they have tried to dampen the sales of vests and masks as if they have much offensive value. >> > > The originalist interpretation is that "arms" means about what arms > were when the Constitution was written. Rifles and handguns (and > swords!), but not machine guns or bazookas or nerve gas. Why no bazookas? tactical military rocketry was a thing back then. so were genades, and cannon, germ warfare was a thing too. -- Notsodium is mined on the banks of denial.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals jurb6006@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 06:12 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 11:25 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2018-10-10 09:39 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 13:29 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 13:35 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2018-10-10 11:19 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 15:33 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 15:41 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2018-10-10 13:34 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 17:01 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals jurb6006@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 14:10 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2018-10-10 14:21 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 17:56 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2018-10-11 05:32 +0000
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2018-10-11 09:09 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2018-10-11 06:52 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals jurb6006@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 07:08 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals jurb6006@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 07:10 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2018-10-11 06:37 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2018-10-11 06:49 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals jurb6006@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 23:36 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2018-10-11 06:44 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2018-10-11 07:08 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 17:50 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2018-10-10 21:23 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2018-10-11 05:12 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals jurb6006@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 23:37 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2018-10-10 16:52 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals gregz <zekor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-11 07:09 +0000
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2018-10-11 05:15 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2018-10-10 15:29 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 20:58 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals bitrex <user@example.net> - 2018-10-10 20:59 -0400
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2018-10-10 15:15 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2018-10-11 06:16 -0700
Re: MyTurn To Be OT: Liberals John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2018-10-10 10:56 -0700
csiph-web