Groups > sci.electronics.design > #461621

ping: sea moss -- Re: Achieving 98%, RIS-767

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From	Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	ping: sea moss -- Re: Achieving 98%, RIS-767
Date	24 May 2017 19:06:58 -0700
Organization	Rowland Institute
Lines	16
Message-ID	<og5e82027d3@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References	<nvvrni02lg2@drn.newsguy.com> <275abfbe-5306-41d3-a184-8b0372ca77d7@googlegroups.com> <277cc57e-d0c0-4345-99be-ed8e34fb9535@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	p112e0f32bdb5c04ffffd01100b6be116888e9e3e2caba7fb.newsdawg.com
User-Agent	Direct Read News 5.60
X-Received-Bytes	1055
X-Received-Body-CRC	1174319008
Xref	csiph.com sci.electronics.design:461621

Show key headers only | View raw

sea moss wrote...
>
> Great.  Thanks for taking the time to chop up the boards.
> I forgot to ask what the required tolerance is on the
> 2.4V output... how about 10%, too loose?

 You pick tolerance, % loss is the key parameter to study.

 Hey, sea moss, I need your exact mailing address,
 please. My package to you was returned.  email:
 winfieldhill@yahoo.com


-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ping: sea moss   --   Re: Achieving 98%, RIS-767 Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-05-24 19:06 -0700
  Re: ping: sea moss   --   Re: Achieving 98%, RIS-767 sea moss <danluster81@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 20:17 -0700
    Re: ping: sea moss   --   Re: Achieving 98%, RIS-767 Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-05-25 05:09 -0700

csiph-web