Groups > sci.electronics.design > #454267

Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down

Path	csiph.com!news.fcku.it!peer03.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From	Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down
Date	30 Mar 2017 13:18:33 -0700
Organization	Rowland Institute
Lines	16
Message-ID	<objp6p02okm@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References	<Nl2DA.428151$fZ.218528@fx41.am4> <nZSdnV2gsZOoo0DFnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	p2c90f40f4405774c4d4d67b255f86c17cc14a95da1e10f88.newsdawg.com
User-Agent	Direct Read News 5.60
X-Received-Body-CRC	2247751991
X-Received-Bytes	1130
Xref	csiph.com sci.electronics.design:454267

Show key headers only | View raw

Tim Wescott wrote...
>
>Second, you want some hysteresis, or at a certain level of charge the 
>thing will start madly turning on and off.  Without hysteresis the 
>current will get shut off, the battery voltage will rebound, the circuit 
>will turn on, the battery voltage will get pulled low, and the cycle will 
>repeat.

 True, but a 1-volt battery with no load doesn't
 rebound very much.  If the hysteresis is, say,
 0.25V, it should stay off.


-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win

Thread

Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Robert Miller <robert.miller@teledyne.com> - 2017-03-30 18:21 +1100
  Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-30 05:13 -0700
    Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-30 10:20 -0700
      Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-03-30 14:39 -0500
    Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Robert Miller <robert.miller@teledyne.com> - 2017-04-01 07:42 +1100
      Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 18:03 -0400
        Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Robert Miller <robert.miller@teledyne.com> - 2017-04-01 10:35 +1100
          Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 19:49 -0400
      Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-31 17:56 -0700
        Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-04-01 11:17 -0400
  Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-30 07:14 -0700
  Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-30 12:19 -0500
    Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-30 13:18 -0700
      Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-03-30 15:52 -0500
        Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-03-30 14:31 -0700
          Re: Simple Low Voltage Shut Down mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2017-03-30 15:02 -0700

csiph-web