Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #454045
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: tig hi freq |
| Date | Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:04:38 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <obemlm$os7$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <obb6u4$gih$1@reader1.panix.com> <67SdnTyr9LXv_ETFnZ2dnUU7-YXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <obc5vf$h9j$4@reader1.panix.com> <itKdneDUsITiLUfFnZ2dnUU7-YWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | panix2.panix.com |
| X-Trace | reader1.panix.com 1490738678 25479 166.84.1.2 (28 Mar 2017 22:04:38 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@panix.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:04:38 +0000 (UTC) |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.electronics.design:454045 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Jon - good gage. I'll keep that in mind. Hul Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote: > Hul Tytus wrote: > > Jon - any suggestions on which of the newer tig welders has the more > > modern hi freq drive? > Well, if it is the size of a lunchbox, it must be the modern style. > I have an 800 Lb Lincoln Square Wave TIG 300, so that is definitely the OLD > style. It is the size of a small fridge. The HF is strong enough you can > weld really thin stuff with just HF! > Jon
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-27 14:17 +0000
Re: tig hi freq George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-03-27 08:00 -0700
Re: tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-27 16:15 +0000
Re: tig hi freq tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-03-27 09:40 -0700
Re: tig hi freq Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-27 09:45 -0700
Re: tig hi freq Bill Martin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2017-03-27 10:24 -0700
Re: tig hi freq Neon John <no@never.com> - 2017-03-31 15:27 -0400
Re: tig hi freq Bill Martin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2017-03-31 14:42 -0700
Re: tig hi freq "dcaster@krl.org" <dcaster@krl.org> - 2017-03-27 11:22 -0700
Re: tig hi freq George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-03-27 11:37 -0700
Re: tig hi freq Neon John <no@never.com> - 2017-03-31 15:01 -0400
Re: tig hi freq Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-27 12:19 -0500
Re: tig hi freq "dcaster@krl.org" <dcaster@krl.org> - 2017-03-27 11:15 -0700
Re: tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-27 22:56 +0000
Re: tig hi freq amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2017-03-27 14:54 -0500
Re: tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-27 22:55 +0000
Re: tig hi freq Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-03-27 18:33 +0000
Re: tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-27 22:57 +0000
Re: tig hi freq Chris Jones <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> - 2017-03-28 18:07 +1100
Re: tig hi freq Neon John <no@never.com> - 2017-03-31 15:50 -0400
Re: tig hi freq Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2017-03-27 14:02 -0500
Re: tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-27 23:07 +0000
Re: tig hi freq Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2017-03-28 13:51 -0500
Re: tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 22:04 +0000
Re: tig hi freq sroberts6328@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 06:55 -0700
Re: tig hi freq sroberts6328@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 07:01 -0700
Re: tig hi freq sroberts6328@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 07:15 -0700
Re: tig hi freq Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2017-03-29 15:05 +0000
Re: tig hi freq Neon John <no@never.com> - 2017-03-31 15:35 -0400
csiph-web