Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #446720

Re: Difference Amp.

From Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: Difference Amp.
Date 2017-02-07 17:40 -0800
Organization Rowland Institute
Message-ID <o7dsuk01h6k@drn.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <a0ba2179-d6c6-4165-b751-60d6d2281f22@googlegroups.com> <kgsk9cdvd13o0vpfa7ocbub4r30lsn4hvg@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


John Larkin wrote...
>
>> Hmm that might be my only question.  Would you
>> use these instead of an opamp and 0.1% R's? 
>
> A difference amp, with tracking laser-trimmed
> resistors inside, is fairly cheap.

 Right.  These parts aren't going to disappear.
 Most of the popular versions shown in our 1989
 2nd edition are still going strong, and will
 for decades to come.
  
> One cool part is AD8130, 270 MHz, interesting
> architecture.

 The high-frequency gain and good CMRR is nice, but
 since it uses the cancellation of two differential
 BJT g_m stages as its input, it isn't a precision
 part, like a fine op-amp + 0.01% matched resistors.


-- 
 Thanks,
    - Win

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Difference Amp. George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-07 12:56 -0800
  Re: Difference Amp. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-07 16:40 -0500
    Re: Difference Amp. gghero27@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 17:47 -0800
      Re: Difference Amp. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-08 11:45 -0500
        Re: Difference Amp. George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-08 10:58 -0800
          Re: Difference Amp. Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-08 12:20 -0700
            Re: Difference Amp. Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-08 12:34 -0700
              Re: Difference Amp. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-08 16:09 -0500
                Re: Difference Amp. Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-08 14:12 -0700
                Re: Difference Amp. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-08 16:15 -0500
                Re: Difference Amp. Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-02-08 14:21 -0700
                Re: Difference Amp. George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-08 16:28 -0800
          Re: Difference Amp. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-08 16:08 -0500
    Re: Difference Amp. gghero27@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 17:47 -0800
  Re: Difference Amp. sdy <sdeyoreo@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-07 16:20 -0800
    Re: Difference Amp. gghero27@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 17:50 -0800
      Re: Difference Amp. John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-08 12:45 -0800
  Re: Difference Amp. John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-07 17:22 -0800
    Re: Difference Amp. Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-07 17:40 -0800
      Re: Difference Amp. Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-08 18:10 +0000
        Re: Difference Amp. Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-02-08 12:06 -0800
          Re: Difference Amp. Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-09 17:55 +0000
  Re: Difference Amp. Kamen Lilov <kamenl@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 11:25 -0800
    Re: Difference Amp. George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-08 12:41 -0800
      Re: Difference Amp. George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-08 12:47 -0800
    Re: Difference Amp. krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-08 20:43 -0500

csiph-web