Groups > sci.electronics.design > #461811

Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC
Date	Fri, 26 May 2017 08:12:23 -0700
Lines	37
Message-ID	<eoquubFt2c8U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<eolst8Fnsc1U1@mid.individual.net> <og4jv5$gc9$1@dont-email.me> <eop9g8FhdejU5@mid.individual.net> <og7uoa$s95$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net ntoipYCDOkqTXH7dj1wKbAp9NWLUr9PNJ21jTekdvQeZokVkf+
Cancel-Lock	sha1:/08+ELRIt2V7DPdd4RrZ28n9gL4=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
In-Reply-To	<og7uoa$s95$1@dont-email.me>
Xref	csiph.com sci.electronics.design:461811

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2017-05-25 18:04, JM wrote:
> On 26/05/2017 01:00, Joerg wrote:
>> On 2017-05-24 11:41, JM wrote:
>>> On 24/05/2017 18:06, Joerg wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Just had a discussion with a contract manufacturer. They were of the
>>>> opinion that a solder joint where there is complete circumferential
>>>> inward capillary on the component side but regular wicking on the
>>>> solder
>>>> side is acceptable. This is consumer stuff and I am more used to the
>>>> hi-rel industry where this is not deemed acceptable because nobody
>>>> would
>>>> know how deep the inward capillary action goes.
>>>>
>>>> I do not have IPC manuals and usually it does not apply to my stuff. A
>>>> web search only brings up examples that talk just about one side at a
>>>> time. Any pointers?
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/0pmth1yw9kp8m8w/For%20Joerg.pdf?dl=0
>>
>>
>> Only says "We can’t find what you’re looking for" :-(
>>
>
> These links have a timeout.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/d3xpyn3ksjjbtl8/For%20Joerg.pdf?dl=0


Thanks, that's it!

-- 
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-24 10:06 -0700
  Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC JM <dontreplytothis173@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 19:29 +0100
    Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-25 16:56 -0700
      Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-25 21:54 -0400
        Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-26 08:07 -0700
          Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 12:36 -0400
            Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-26 09:53 -0700
  Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC speff <spehro@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 11:30 -0700
    Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-25 16:59 -0700
  Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC JM <dontreplytothis173@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 19:41 +0100
    Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-24 13:51 -0700
      Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-25 17:01 -0700
    Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-25 17:00 -0700
      Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC JM <dontreplytothis173@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 02:04 +0100
        Re: Acceptable thru-hole solder joints, IPC Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-05-26 08:12 -0700

csiph-web