Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #454299
| From | Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice |
| Date | 2017-03-30 16:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ek5karF3h7rU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <6333a501-10dd-4816-ba59-57b374a64a1b@googlegroups.com> <ek4ui0Ftpf0U1@mid.individual.net> <objipn$8hb$1@dont-email.me> <ek55mdFpc5U1@mid.individual.net> <09b489fd-f376-4dbf-84ad-cf19263cfa41@googlegroups.com> |
On 2017-03-30 15:16, Francesco Zappon wrote: > On Thursday, 30 March 2017 21:47:29 UTC+2, Joerg wrote: > > >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/52nqfror1jhkqm0/venturini2013.pdf?dl=0 >> >> >> Thanks! That helps a great deal. The SNR numbers in there do not >> look very stellar but they claim to have achieved all objectives >> stated (using sub-ranging though). > > Thanks JM for posting it before me! > > I was not directly involved with the project, but from the notes I > found around it seems that the main "problems" they had with the > first version (the one in the article) were: - too much leakage Maybe you should then look into SOI like Phil suggested. Then guard rings and all the usual low-current tricks. > (degrading the low current measurements) - the need of an FPGA to > operate the chip (to control it and readout the data) - some > linearity issues > Linearity will always be tough because of your 120dB. FPGA could be done in space. Work together with Gerhard maybe? He is located close to you and is self-employed as far as I know. > >> >> Francesco, I am wondering what you'd like to improve above and >> beyond what these guys did? Is it the sub-ranging and subsequent >> SNR trade-off that you don't like? > > I don't know if I can really say I want to "improve" it. The chip > itself was working quite nice, but for several reasons (I can > explain, but it would take a long post and it is not super-relevant > to the discussion here) we need a new version with a new technology. > If it is more or less a transfer from an obsolete technology to a new one for foundry reasons and such I'd talk to an analog IC design house. > Now, I can keep the same approach (no problem on my side) but > changing technology node means doing a redesign and re-dimension of > the OTA, for starters. And this is where I struggle, because I am a > bit in the dark about how to "obtain" the specs of the amplifier. > I can't imagine going to another node being a large obstacle. You can always use larger geometries as you did before, it's just the minimum that is now lower. Plus of course process differences but that is where a good IC design house helps. We always used those for IC designs, never went it alone. > But I think I might be starting from the wrong point (after reading > the posts here): I probably should start with the OpAmp as a black > box and consider it ideal, and from there calculate the behavior of > the circuit in ideal conditions; and after this, probably the OpAmp > becomes a bit more straightforward. > Just keep in mind that in the real world nothing is ideal and you will always have offset, offset drift, offset tempco and such effects. >> >> If you really want to use a I/F concept (which as others have >> hinted may not be the optimum here) there are V/F converters where >> the manufacturer claims 6 decades which corresponds to 120dB: >> >> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/vfc320.pdf >> >> This would have to be preceded by a low noise TIA for a current to >> voltage conversion and those architectures are described in the >> field of pre-biased photodiodes. Like here: >> >> http://electrooptical.net/www/frontends/frontends.pdf > > Thanks for all the info. I have some reading to do! > It sure is a nice engineering challenge. Those are the things that keep us young :-) -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OpAmp design - from theory to practice Francesco Zappon <cescozep@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 07:55 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-29 11:51 -0500
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-29 11:53 -0500
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Francesco Zappon <cescozep@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 01:02 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-03-30 10:54 +0100
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice sroberts6328@gmail.com - 2017-03-30 05:25 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-03-30 14:37 +0200
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Francesco Zappon <cescozep@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 07:16 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-03-30 20:25 +0200
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-03-30 14:51 -0400
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-30 12:58 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-03-30 13:25 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-03-30 23:55 +0200
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-30 16:43 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-03-30 11:43 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Francesco Zappon <cescozep@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:02 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2017-03-31 10:20 +0200
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-30 12:14 -0500
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Francesco Zappon <cescozep@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:05 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-30 10:45 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice JM <dontreplytothis173@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 19:32 +0100
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-30 12:47 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Francesco Zappon <cescozep@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:16 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-03-30 16:11 -0700
Re: OpAmp design - from theory to practice Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2017-03-30 16:57 -0700
csiph-web