Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #747521
| From | Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? |
| Date | 2026-09-10 03:19 -0300 |
| Organization | Primarily biological and memetic |
| Message-ID | <87pkyl8w6z.fsf@debian> (permalink) |
| References | <87mrtw5vae.fsf@debian> <18d3b81ab477b829$5727$2028749$4226dc73@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> writes: > It's an amateur development not suited for production. It's full of > bugs and insurmountable architectural deficiencies. Can you be specific? > The original developer got burned out and quit it and the follow-on > start-from-scratch replacement. Which should tell you something, as > in, if he didn't want anything further to do with it, why would you? That is not correct; according to the Git log, Helmut Neemann wrote the first commit 10 years ago, the most recent commit on Monday, and about 98% of the 4566 commits in between. Is it possible you’re confusing “Digital” with a different piece of software? Kragen
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-04 22:41 -0300
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-05 07:11 -0700
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-05 09:45 -0700
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-09-05 21:41 +0000
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-05 17:23 -0700
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-09-09 17:45 +0000
AI code and circuit designs (was Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE?) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-10 02:39 -0300
Re: AI code and circuit designs (was Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE?) Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-09 23:19 -0700
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-09-05 18:59 +0000
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-09-09 17:45 +0000
Re: hneemann's "Digital" for more than just introduction-to-EE? Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-10 03:19 -0300
csiph-web