Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.electronics.components > #5853

Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs.

From MJC <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com>
Newsgroups alt.engineering.electrical, sci.electronics.components, sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.repair
Subject Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs.
Date 2015-11-19 09:12 +0000
Message-ID <MPG.30b7a2ef959cb0969896a2@news.plus.net> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <dq-dnVIK5usQ9NfLnZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <0001HW.1BFC39D10006690311EAA03CF@news.eternal-september.org> <d3ap4b979mmlp8c9n69o8kkee5kb3mme7p@4ax.com> <0001HW.1BFCE6400001015E1251323CF@news.eternal-september.org> <punp4bd0sg9d573f682t30erftq5p6jq7j@4ax.com>
Organization Private

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <punp4bd0sg9d573f682t30erftq5p6jq7j@4ax.com>, 
legg@nospam.magma.ca says...
> The spec sheet for either Alpha or Lapp products will list the degree
> of resistance to oil or chemicals. I don't know what you go by, but
> gasoline and other solvents don't tend to hang around - they may
> sometimes be intentionally used in cleaning, but only under 'user
> beware' conditions. Both mfrs sell on-line. Alpha will cut.

Good point... The ends of the shrink shroud will have to be protected to 
ensure that the oil does not get inside. Otherwise it will "hang 
around" doing its worst!

Mike.

Back to sci.electronics.components | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-10 11:25 -0800
  Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> - 2015-11-10 19:37 +0000
    Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-10 11:44 -0800
      Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 18:49 -0500
        Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-11 23:10 -0500
        Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-15 11:46 -0800
  Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. "Rich." <rcres@XXnewsguy.com> - 2015-11-10 15:14 -0500
  Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-10 15:32 -0500
  Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-10 14:14 -0800
    Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. Glen Walpert <nospam@null.void> - 2015-11-11 02:22 +0000
      Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-11-11 18:25 -0500
        Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-15 11:47 -0800
          Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 16:39 -0500
            Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-17 20:31 -0800
              Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-17 20:33 -0800
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. JC <Chipbee40_SpamNo@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-18 09:15 -0500
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-18 09:41 -0800
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-18 12:51 -0500
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. JC <Chipbee40_SpamNo@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-18 13:19 -0500
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-18 13:38 -0500
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 11:10 -0500
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-19 11:52 -0500
            Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-19 11:50 -0500
          Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-11-15 18:21 -0500
          Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-11-15 18:24 -0500
  Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2015-11-16 08:58 -0500
    Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. indyrat500@eti.com - 2015-11-16 23:41 +0000
      Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-17 20:45 -0800
        Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2015-11-18 11:37 -0500
          Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-18 09:00 -0800
            Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2015-11-18 15:39 -0500
              Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. MJC <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> - 2015-11-19 09:12 +0000
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 08:25 -0800
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-19 11:46 -0500
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-19 12:18 -0500
                Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-19 09:44 -0800
  Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-11-22 17:34 -0800
    Re: Multi-conductor control cable: PVC vs. DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-11-22 20:58 -0500

csiph-web