Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.crypt > #50113 > unrolled thread

Vector Factoring and Vector Cryptography. -ASLEC website -

Started byaustin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com>
First post2021-09-25 02:08 -0700
Last post2021-09-25 11:23 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.crypt


Contents

  Vector Factoring and Vector Cryptography. -ASLEC website - austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 02:08 -0700
    Re: Vector Factoring and Vector Cryptography. -ASLEC website - Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-25 11:23 +0100

#50113 — Vector Factoring and Vector Cryptography. -ASLEC website -

Fromaustin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com>
Date2021-09-25 02:08 -0700
SubjectVector Factoring and Vector Cryptography. -ASLEC website -
Message-ID<50836fb9-c53c-4f76-b44f-3b60c9d6ec4fn@googlegroups.com>
Introduction.

This cryptography uses ‘directed number-lines’ being used instead of the universal number-line that may have arbitrary direction and which has been used in cryptography ever since the very beginning centuries ago. This means that the user of vector cryptography has a vast domain of number-lines to draw from whereas traditional cryptographers have had only one line ever that they were bound to use repeatedly for every encryption/decryption of any number of plaintext characters however great.  Concealing their transformations of plaintext into ciphertext is extremely difficult and although it gives rise to some very fine algorithms that were elegant and intelligent they did not really do the job of complete obfuscation of the plaintext.  The ciphers that they produced could never really shake off the threat of statistical cryptanalysis.

In vector cryptography the entities can use a different number-line for each and every encryption of a single plaintext and discard it immediately for a fresh line for the next plaintext.

In a nutshell, vector cryptography has an infinite number of number-lines that a cryptographer may use whereas traditional (scalar) cryptography has only one. In vector cryptography the number-line in hand each time begins in a fresh plane and is used to track the transformation of a plaintext to a unique point in three-dimensional space i.e. the transformation becomes a ‘displacement’ which is a vector quantity.

The innate perpendicular property of the humble ‘vector cross-product’ is a natural transforming operator that lends itself admirably to enable profoundly strong cryptography.

Because of using directed number-lines this cryptography requires a fairly advanced knowledge of vector methods in plane geometry.

I have created a cipher that is vector-based and it uses my personal invention of  “ Vector Factoring”.  That cipher is called the ‘ASLEC’ cipher. ASLEC is an acronym of “Alternating Skew Line Encryption Cipher. 

The general concept of ‘vector factoring’ and ‘vector cryptography’ is described here in this document but not the ASLEC cipher,

To the reader.  

To see the complete graphics and descriptoion -Google 'ASLEC.UK

Enjoy - 
Austin O' Byrne

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#50114

FromRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Date2021-09-25 11:23 +0100
Message-ID<simtb5$6hh$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#50113
On 25/09/2021 10:08, austin obyrne wrote:
> the user of vector cryptography has a vast domain of number-lines to
> draw from whereas traditional cryptographers have had only one line
> ever that they were bound to use repeatedly for every
> encryption/decryption of any number of plaintext characters however
> great.  Concealing their transformations of plaintext into ciphertext
> is extremely difficult and although it gives rise to some very fine
> algorithms that were elegant and intelligent they did not really do
> the job of complete obfuscation of the plaintext.

Yes, they do. Your claim is tantamount to a claim that you can crack a
one time pad. It's nonsense.

> The ciphers that they produced could never really shake off the
> threat of statistical cryptanalysis.

OTP can do precisely that. Vector cryptography cannot. We proved that
when we broke it.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.crypt


csiph-web