Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.crypt > #50223 > unrolled thread

SUSE Reviving Usenet

Started by711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
First post2021-09-29 09:04 -0500
Last post2021-10-12 09:38 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 160 — 35 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.crypt

Contents

  SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-29 09:04 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:44 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-09-30 01:44 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-09-30 12:25 -0400
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 14:03 -0500
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-09-30 23:36 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 20:20 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-09-30 14:45 -1000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 06:30 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:48 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-01 13:47 -0400
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 17:56 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 11:41 -0700
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-01 22:07 -0400
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 20:49 +0100
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:03 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 10:49 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 15:13 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 12:49 -0400
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 13:34 -0700
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:50 +0000
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 05:52 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet chris <chris-nospam@tridac.net> - 2021-10-20 00:00 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:13 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:48 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 22:23 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 16:07 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:06 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 19:55 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 22:17 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 08:15 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-02 13:29 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-02 07:53 -1000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-02 18:58 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:27 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-03 15:34 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 01:05 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-04 14:17 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 16:42 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-04 17:17 +0100
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 16:38 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:10 -0400
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 00:11 -0400
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 08:31 -0400
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 11:34 -0400
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 17:31 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-06 09:31 +0100
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-08 18:53 -0400
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 17:41 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 20:58 -0400
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 06:38 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 01:26 -0500
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 08:12 +0100
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 03:41 -0500
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-05 23:04 +0000
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 06:48 -0700
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 14:17 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 23:03 -0500
                              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-06 04:58 +0000
                                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:59 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:00 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-11-25 20:13 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-26 04:02 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-10-01 23:19 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-09-30 18:38 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 19:26 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-30 21:39 +0200
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-01 21:32 +0200
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 20:31 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:24 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 11:12 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:09 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-02 18:32 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 20:41 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:40 -0500
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-03 13:31 +0200
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 05:15 -0700
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 05:27 -0700
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-03 13:35 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 07:07 -0700
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-03 23:06 -0500
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-03 16:25 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 10:00 -0700
                              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:09 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-03 22:57 -0500
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:06 +0200
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 14:11 +0100
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 10:28 +0200
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 10:44 +0100
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:21 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 15:29 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 11:04 +0200
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet lawrence@cluon.com (Lawrence Statton (NK1G)) - 2021-10-04 13:42 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ulick Magee <ulickmagee@feckoff.invalid> - 2021-11-09 23:55 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-11-09 20:44 -0600
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 06:22 +0100
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:55 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 17:19 +0100
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:13 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 17:30 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-01 18:27 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:46 +0200
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:26 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-02 01:12 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 11:08 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-29 16:25 +0100
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:17 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> - 2021-09-29 15:56 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-09-29 17:22 +0100
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:23 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:22 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 13:27 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 12:58 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-30 19:12 +0100
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 13:16 -0700
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 15:59 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 17:38 -0700
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-29 17:36 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 22:32 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:25 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 10:57 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-02 22:07 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:07 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 11:46 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-03 18:14 +0100
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:35 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 10:45 -0700
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 14:28 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-06 15:55 +0300
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-06 14:35 +0100
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:37 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-07 07:04 +0100
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 18:30 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-07 08:47 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-07 13:07 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:16 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-08 00:08 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:50 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:32 -0500
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:38 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-07 17:42 +0300
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:26 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 23:44 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:23 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:27 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:56 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:58 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-07 20:01 -0700
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-08 00:54 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-12 12:23 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 13:35 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-12 16:16 -0700
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:38 -0500

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

#50432

FromDan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-07 08:47 -0400
Message-ID<sjmq86$479$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#50424
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:

> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>> 
>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>> that long.
>
> I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support for
> UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob.
>
> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding
>
> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.

So early in the morning and what do I read?  BLASPHEMY!  Be gone
heretic.

GNUS handles UTF 8 just fine.

> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.

Words?  It's lines, not words.

-- 
Dan Espen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50433

FromRich <rich@example.invalid>
Date2021-10-07 13:07 +0000
Message-ID<sjmrfd$649$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#50424
In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead.  I never stopped using 
>>> Usenet.  I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never 
>>> considered it dead.
>> 
>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then?  You sure look like a newb with 
>> one that long.
> 
> I suspect you are another Emacs user.  Emacs lacking proper support 
> for UTF-8 is obnoxious.  That would make you the noob.
> 
> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding
> 
> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught 
> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.

A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche 
software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not.

In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50438

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-07 18:16 -0500
Message-ID<sjnv29$q31$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50433
On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote:
> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead.  I never stopped using 
>>>> Usenet.  I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never 
>>>> considered it dead.
>>>
>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then?  You sure look like a newb with 
>>> one that long.
>>
>> I suspect you are another Emacs user.  Emacs lacking proper support 
>> for UTF-8 is obnoxious.  That would make you the noob.
>>
>> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding
>>
>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught 
>> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
> 
> A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche 
> software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not.
> 
> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed.

And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook."

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50442

FromRich <rich@example.invalid>
Date2021-10-08 00:08 +0000
Message-ID<sjo254$87e$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#50438
In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote:
>> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead.  I never stopped using 
>>>>> Usenet.  I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never 
>>>>> considered it dead.
>>>>
>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then?  You sure look like a newb with 
>>>> one that long.
>>>
>>> I suspect you are another Emacs user.  Emacs lacking proper support 
>>> for UTF-8 is obnoxious.  That would make you the noob.
>>>
>>> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding
>>>
>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught 
>>> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
>> 
>> A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche 
>> software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not.
>> 
>> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed.
> 
> And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook."

Plonk

You've likely joined several other group members kill files tonight.

Enjoy talking to a group that is no longer listening.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50445

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-07 20:50 -0500
Message-ID<sjo82n$1enf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50442
On 10/7/21 7:08 PM, Rich wrote:
> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>> On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote:
>>> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead.  I never stopped using 
>>>>>> Usenet.  I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never 
>>>>>> considered it dead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then?  You sure look like a newb with 
>>>>> one that long.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect you are another Emacs user.  Emacs lacking proper support 
>>>> for UTF-8 is obnoxious.  That would make you the noob.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding
>>>>
>>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught 
>>>> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
>>>
>>> A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche 
>>> software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not.
>>>
>>> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed.
>>
>> And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook."
> 
> Plonk
> 
> You've likely joined several other group members kill files tonight.
> 
> Enjoy talking to a group that is no longer listening.

What are you talking about? You don't listen, anyway. You hear only what
you want to hear, and you believe only what you want to believe. That's
what this beta male shit test exercise on my signature is showing.

I enjoy talking to men, not whiners.

Sig is not just short for 'signature.' Sig is also short for 'Sigma.' By
attacking my signature you are attacking my identity, showing yourself
to be a collectivist and conformist. While attacking my identity, and
passively demanding me to comply, you are showing your lack thereof.

"Everything was fine until you showed up."

"You don't know what love is. You do as your told. Just as a child at
ten might act but you're far too old."

SIGMA 711 GIBZ 0FUX 2DAY & 4EVR

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50467

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-12 09:32 -0500
Message-ID<sk4688$4aa$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50442
On 10/7/21 7:08 PM, Rich wrote:

>>> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed.
>>
>> And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook."
> 
> Plonk
> 
> You've likely joined several other group members kill files tonight.
> 
> Enjoy talking to a group that is no longer listening.

I am so sorry I have offended you. Please don't ostracize me. The most
important thing in the world to me is being accepted by total strangers
with an axe to grind!

See below, I have changed my signature to conform to your signature
standards, so it is no longer obnoxious.

-- 
凸( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ook  ( ͡⚆ ͜ʖ ͡⚆)╭∩╮ ook  凸(｀⌒´メ)凸 0FUX4U - Ooga booga

I hope the massah will reconsider my inclusion in his authoritarian
Usenet plantation. Geez thanx boss.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50440

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-07 18:38 -0500
Message-ID<sjo0br$1928$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50433
On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote:
> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead.  I never stopped using 
>>>> Usenet.  I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never 
>>>> considered it dead.
>>>
>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then?  You sure look like a newb with 
>>> one that long.
>>
>> I suspect you are another Emacs user.  Emacs lacking proper support 
>> for UTF-8 is obnoxious.  That would make you the noob.
>>
>> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding
>>
>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught 
>> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
> 
> A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche 
> software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not.
> 
> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed.

No, it is not obnoxious. This tribalist compliance testing is obnoxious.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50434

FromPhil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org>
Date2021-10-07 17:42 +0300
Message-ID<87k0iodhg5.fsf@zotaspaz.fatphil.org>
In reply to#50424
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>> 
>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>> that long.
>
> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.

False.

> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.

There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the
otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise
to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you
thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following
Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice.

Phil
(Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say
that perhaps I lurked too long.)

-- 
I find the easiest thing to do is to k/f myself and just troll away
-- David Melville on r.a.s.f1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50439

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-07 18:26 -0500
Message-ID<sjnvlh$11u2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50434
On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>>
>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>>> that long.
>>
>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
> 
> False.
> 
>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.
> 
> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the
> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise
> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you
> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following
> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice.
> 
> Phil
> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say
> that perhaps I lurked too long.)

You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is
laughable.

Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed
as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and
whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious.

The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text
wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in
tribal female shit tests.

Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50441

FromBranimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>
Date2021-10-07 23:44 +0000
Message-ID<rDL7J.62762$md6.30988@fx36.iad>
In reply to#50439
On 2021-10-07, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>>>
>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>>>> that long.
>>>
>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
>>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
>> 
>> False.
>> 
>>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
>>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.
>> 
>> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the
>> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise
>> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you
>> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following
>> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice.
>> 
>> Phil
>> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say
>> that perhaps I lurked too long.)
>
> You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is
> laughable.
>
> Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed
> as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and
> whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious.
>
> The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text
> wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in
> tribal female shit tests.
>
> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.
>
FREEDOOOOM!

-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!
with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50443

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-07 20:23 -0500
Message-ID<sjo6gj$11q2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50441
On 10/7/21 6:44 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote:
> On 2021-10-07, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>> On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>>>>> that long.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
>>>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
>>>
>>> False.
>>>
>>>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
>>>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.
>>>
>>> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the
>>> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise
>>> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you
>>> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following
>>> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say
>>> that perhaps I lurked too long.)
>>
>> You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is
>> laughable.
>>
>> Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed
>> as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and
>> whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious.
>>
>> The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text
>> wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in
>> tribal female shit tests.
>>
>> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.
>>
> FREEDOOOOM!

"Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And
dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade
all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to
come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but
they will never take our SIGNATURES!"

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50444

FromBranimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>
Date2021-10-08 01:27 +0000
Message-ID<E7N7J.24001$d82.5613@fx21.iad>
In reply to#50443
On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.
>>>
>> FREEDOOOOM!
>
> "Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And
> dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade
> all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to
> come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but
> they will never take our SIGNATURES!"
>
Heh, do you know I work for spooks, for REAL :P
usenet is FREEDOM, and that is freedom from ALL RULES,
that is FREEDOM to speak SWEARING WORDS :P

-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!
with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50446

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-07 20:56 -0500
Message-ID<sjo8f2$1hhj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50444
On 10/7/21 8:27 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote:
> On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>>> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.
>>>>
>>> FREEDOOOOM!
>>
>> "Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And
>> dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade
>> all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to
>> come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but
>> they will never take our SIGNATURES!"
>>
> Heh, do you know I work for spooks, for REAL :P
> usenet is FREEDOM, and that is freedom from ALL RULES,
> that is FREEDOM to speak SWEARING WORDS :P

Whatever is clever. They got what they deserved.

Spooky Mart is the world's only supplier of unpasteurized pig milk.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50447

FromBranimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>
Date2021-10-08 01:58 +0000
Message-ID<rBN7J.96849$Dr.60654@fx40.iad>
In reply to#50446
On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> On 10/7/21 8:27 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote:
>> On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>>>> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.
>>>>>
>>>> FREEDOOOOM!
>>>
>>> "Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And
>>> dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade
>>> all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to
>>> come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but
>>> they will never take our SIGNATURES!"
>>>
>> Heh, do you know I work for spooks, for REAL :P
>> usenet is FREEDOM, and that is freedom from ALL RULES,
>> that is FREEDOM to speak SWEARING WORDS :P
>
> Whatever is clever. They got what they deserved.
>
> Spooky Mart is the world's only supplier of unpasteurized pig milk.
>
LOVE&PEACE to EVERYONE :P

-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!
with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50448

FromPeter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com>
Date2021-10-07 20:01 -0700
Message-ID<972649143.655354693.944599.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#50439
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>>> 
>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>>>> that long.
>>> 
>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
>>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
>> 
>> False.
>> 
>>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
>>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.
>> 
>> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the
>> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise
>> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you
>> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following
>> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice.
>> 
>> Phil
>> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say
>> that perhaps I lurked too long.)
> 
> You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is
> laughable.
> 
> Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed
> as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and
> whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious.
> 
> The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text
> wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in
> tribal female shit tests.
> 
> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.
> 

I can’t even figure out what your .sig is supposed to represent.

-- 
Pete

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50449

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-08 00:54 -0500
Message-ID<sjomdh$1mfb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50448
On 10/7/21 10:01 PM, Peter Flass wrote:

> I can’t even figure out what your .sig is supposed to represent.

This might help.

Message-ID: <sc8e04$49t$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID: <sc8e7n$a1e$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID: <sc8eh3$cnm$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID: <sc8f20$gvu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID: <sc8fdh$k40$1@gioia.aioe.org>

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50469

FromD.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-12 12:23 -0500
Message-ID<c3hbmg90j4vkvl2mgudo2vr8uecf5jus0n@4ax.com>
In reply to#50439
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 18:26:33 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
wrote:
>On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>>>
>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>>>> that long.
>>>
>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
>>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
>> 
>> False.
>> 
>>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
>>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.
>> 
>> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the
>> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise
>> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you
>> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following
>> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice.
>> 
>> Phil
>> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say
>> that perhaps I lurked too long.)
>
>You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is
>laughable.
>
>Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed
>as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and
>whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious.
>
>The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text
>wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in
>tribal female shit tests.
>
>Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it.

Lots of male egos around. I once used a 'non-standard' quote symbol.
My use of it is still out there.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50470

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-12 13:35 -0500
Message-ID<sk4kej$1ga8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50469
On 10/12/21 12:23 PM, D.J. wrote:

> Lots of male egos around. I once used a 'non-standard' quote symbol.
> My use of it is still out there.

For this sacrelige, thou shouldst be beaten to the uttermost with a sock
full of moo poo for thine wicked word woo.

And that non-standard quote symbol can be exhumed and burned thrice at
the stake!

Thus adjudicateth the Ubernummer.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50472

FromPeter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com>
Date2021-10-12 16:16 -0700
Message-ID<754093998.655773151.729150.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#50470
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> On 10/12/21 12:23 PM, D.J. wrote:
> 
>> Lots of male egos around. I once used a 'non-standard' quote symbol.
>> My use of it is still out there.
> 
> For this sacrelige, thou shouldst be beaten to the uttermost with a sock
> full of moo poo for thine wicked word woo.
> 
> And that non-standard quote symbol can be exhumed and burned thrice at
> the stake!
> 
> Thus adjudicateth the Ubernummer.
> 

Most of us aren’t out to “get” people. Egregiously annoying posters are
usually gently corrected. This newsgroup is fir discussion of computer
history and folklore, with frequent digressions. So far all I’ve seen from
you is whining about how you’re being treated. Have you actually posted
on-topic? If so, it must have gotten buried in all the noise, I seem to
have missed it.


-- 
Pete

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50468

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-12 09:38 -0500
Message-ID<sk46j2$9q0$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50434
On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>>
>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
>>> that long.
>>
>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.
> 
> False.
> 
>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.
> 
> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the
> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise
> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you
> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following
> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice.

"hallowed company" ... _gags_

The "subliminal advice" is the signal to everyone else that they will be
ostracized for being different, or not kneeling to your vague demands.

Richard Heathfield is a slanderer with an inflated sense of his own
importance. Go ahead and follow his "sage" advice. You deserve each other.

May you and your supercilious, "hallowed" friends enjoy blowing smoke up
each others' cornholes.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

Back to top | Article view | sci.crypt

csiph-web