Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.crypt |
| Subject | Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? |
| Date | 2015-10-16 23:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d8e0hpF2g81U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mvn0el$nr4$1@dont-email.me> <d8cocnFndf0U1@mid.individual.net> <mvroge$6sc$1@orkan.itea.ntnu.no> |
On 2015-10-16 20:59:58 +0000, kg said: > Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey+news@goldmark.org> wrote: > > Which means, if you choose your field to be big enough to resist a > well-resourced attacker, you are ok. > > Choose big enough primes. Yep. I do get that. All of the discussion of "fixes" in the paper were, "use a bigger group, but if for some reaons you have to use a 1024 modulus, ..." >> 1. Does this apply to elliptic curves as as well? > > Well, most algorithms have different optimum parameters when you > are computing many d.log.s than when you are computing just one, and > typically, this reduces the per-logarithm cost. But nothing as drastic > as the number field sieve. Thanks. This feels counter intuitive to me, but that just illustrates that I don't have good intuitions about attacks on DH that don't generally apply to d.logs. > Choose a big enough curve. Yeah. I do get that. I was mostly asking to help spur me on to a better understanding of that some of the attacks on DH are specific to integer fields. > >> 2. Are there good tools for generating safe primes that are available >> to developers? > > The problem isn't bad primes. It is too small primes. I wasn't suggesting that the attacks involve bad primes. Instead it is that not just any prime (of sufficient size) will do for a DH group. We want a "safe prime". And so I was asking about tools for generating a safe prime. > Choose bigger primes. Problem solved. I think I am begining to detect a pattern here. >> 2a. Analogue of question 2 but for ECC parameters? > > Again, choose big enough curves. Yes. Definitely a hint of a pattern. > While many people still use 1024 bit fields, Yes. This is a sad fact. > I believe few people > re using less than a 224 bit curve, which is equivalent to 2048 bit > fields. I believe most people use a 256 bit curve, which is equivalent > to 3000 bit fields. Thanks. So one last question. Is there some simple thing I can do to avoid the sorts of attacks described in the paper? > Choose a big enough curve [or primes]. There we go! Cheers, -j
Back to sci.crypt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-15 01:44 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-10-15 12:04 -0700
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? wizzofozz <oscxxxxxxxaas@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 22:24 +0200
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-15 23:13 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2015-10-16 18:47 -0700
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-16 10:09 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-15 22:38 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-15 23:11 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-10-16 02:08 +0200
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-16 00:25 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-10-16 04:04 +0200
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> - 2015-10-16 11:53 -0500
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-16 17:54 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2015-10-16 19:14 -0700
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2015-10-16 20:18 +0200
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? kg <kristiag+news@math.ntnu.no> - 2015-10-16 20:59 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> - 2015-10-16 23:19 -0500
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? kg <kristiag+news@math.ntnu.no> - 2015-10-18 11:37 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> - 2015-10-19 00:20 -0500
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-18 22:53 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-19 01:18 +0000
Re: How is NSA breaking so much crypto? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-10-30 08:45 +0100
csiph-web