Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.astro > #57945 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-03 12:52 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-15 21:39 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 408 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.astro
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-04-03 12:52 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-04 15:20 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 12:58 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-05 03:50 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-05 18:20 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 16:14 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-05 18:47 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 00:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-04-07 06:10 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 18:51 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-08 14:23 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:25 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-09 09:57 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 10:20 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Gothar the Undending, Dreaded by Darkness, Soul Eater and Destroyer of Stars" <Gothar@the.end.of.time> - 2016-04-14 23:59 +0100
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-17 12:53 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 13:01 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-17 19:38 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 00:27 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Mandy Liefbowitz <mandyliefbowitz@the.port.side> - 2016-04-14 23:20 +0100
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 00:28 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-04-05 22:14 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 03:38 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Gothar the Undending, Dreaded by Darkness, Soul Eater and Destroyer of Stars" <Gothar@the.end.of.time> - 2016-04-15 01:03 +0100
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:58 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:17 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 00:07 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-04-07 06:24 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 19:03 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Gothar the Undending, Dreaded by Darkness, Soul Eater and Destroyer of Stars" <Gothar@the.end.of.time> - 2016-04-15 00:25 +0100
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-04-05 19:53 -0600
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 03:42 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-04-05 23:06 -0600
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 18:05 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:34 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-07 19:18 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 13:04 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-07 21:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 00:03 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-08 17:50 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:03 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-08 21:47 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 21:24 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-09 13:55 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-09 10:08 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:51 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 12:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 20:16 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 19:07 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 06:16 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 06:46 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:23 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:19 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 22:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 20:02 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 04:05 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 01:41 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:18 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:20 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-17 12:53 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 13:02 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-10 12:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 06:57 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-10 14:17 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 08:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-10 16:40 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:38 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-11 19:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:50 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 20:02 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:16 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:03 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:54 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:18 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:04 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 22:33 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 21:48 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 05:02 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 00:07 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:23 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:09 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:36 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 21:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:24 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 02:51 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:03 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:36 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:02 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 13:40 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:09 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 15:40 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:53 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 17:24 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:42 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 19:24 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 04:13 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 22:02 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:04 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:21 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 22:42 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 01:33 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:07 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 20:44 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 19:35 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 23:55 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Gothar the Undending, Dreaded by Darkness, Soul Eater and Destroyer of Stars" <Gothar@the.end.of.time> - 2016-04-15 01:21 +0100
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 23:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:24 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:10 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 22:40 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 21:55 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 06:11 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 07:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 12:57 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 20:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 19:30 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-04-09 00:01 -0600
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Womack <twomack@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2016-04-09 09:21 +0100
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:24 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-09 15:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 10:45 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 19:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:22 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 20:41 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 19:50 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-06 17:39 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 18:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:36 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 19:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 12:59 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:28 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 23:52 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:14 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 22:42 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 21:57 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 06:14 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 07:52 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-09 10:09 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:31 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 20:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 19:42 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-07 15:55 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 19:14 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-09 14:54 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:36 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 20:36 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 19:44 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 06:19 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 06:47 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-04-09 18:17 -0600
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 00:37 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-10 16:50 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:13 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-11 16:41 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:21 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-12 15:48 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:21 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-12 21:08 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Mandy Liefbowitz <mandyliefbowitz@the.port.side> - 2016-04-14 22:56 +0100
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-05 17:42 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-05 18:32 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-05 18:54 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-04-05 19:57 -0600
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:28 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-06 17:56 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 18:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 15:43 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 20:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:35 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 23:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 19:28 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 03:51 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 22:06 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 06:17 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 12:32 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:33 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 00:01 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:32 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:16 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 22:52 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 21:59 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 06:18 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:45 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 20:54 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:01 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:42 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 16:12 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 01:10 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 20:22 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 06:09 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:36 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:24 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:24 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:08 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-12 21:08 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:51 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 22:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 17:11 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 04:30 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 23:31 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 19:56 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 14:16 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 01:06 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:48 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:18 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 22:59 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 22:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 06:19 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 20:57 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:44 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 16:14 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 01:12 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 20:23 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 06:14 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:38 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:25 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:11 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-12 21:09 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-08 20:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 23:05 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-07 16:20 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:09 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 14:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:43 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 01:22 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:51 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:19 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 23:12 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 05:49 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 06:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 18:54 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:10 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 21:03 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:11 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 06:23 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 06:50 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 16:16 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 01:14 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 20:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 06:16 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:40 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:30 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:27 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:27 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-07 21:40 -0500
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-09 15:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:20 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 21:14 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:20 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 17:37 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 01:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 20:44 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 06:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:11 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:05 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:51 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:28 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:51 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:53 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:31 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 18:54 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 03:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:39 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:01 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 13:39 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:24 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 16:53 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 18:28 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 01:47 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 20:23 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 04:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 22:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:32 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:48 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 23:43 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-10 17:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:56 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 17:44 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 01:30 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 20:46 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 05:21 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 01:43 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-11 16:48 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> - 2016-04-11 18:52 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-12 15:53 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:23 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:32 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:13 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:06 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:52 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:54 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:33 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:09 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:45 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-13 15:39 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 09:34 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:59 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:57 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:15 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:47 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:05 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:30 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 16:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:25 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 18:30 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 02:09 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 21:41 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:33 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 23:46 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 02:38 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:57 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:25 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 19:21 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 12:55 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 20:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 19:39 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:23 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 23:58 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-14 16:46 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:31 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:27 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 16:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 18:32 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 02:10 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 21:41 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:50 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:53 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:17 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:48 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:35 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 17:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:32 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 19:20 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:38 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 16:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 23:52 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 02:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:59 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 19:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 12:54 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:12 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:24 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:34 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:15 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:18 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 18:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:01 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:39 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:22 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:10 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:39 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:30 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 17:07 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 19:21 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:39 +0000
Page 20 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 18 19 [20] 21 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 00:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <odp5uc-816.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58355 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you, >>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Rean the RFC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Bile spewing idiot. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face >>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what? >>>>> >>>> >>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see >>>>those characters as a single quote? >>>> >>> >>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim? >>> >> >>Only one to notice. >> > > Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it. > Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU. And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be able to read minds now? >> >>Only one to make the effort to comment. >> > > And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why > do they all hate you so, Jim? "caterwauling"? If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on about something that has nothing to do with you. >> >>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >> > > Really? On what planet? All of them. > Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat > actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a > complaint about the state of the meat. Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well. > Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint". A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>> >>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it? >>>> >>> >>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or >>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the >>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's >>> always the other guy. >> >>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on >>about it. >> >>> >>> Why did you bring it up? >> >>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem. >> > > Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it. You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something that has absolutely nothing to do with you. If anyone is caterwauling it is you. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 19:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pcj0hb9sos26ajlqn9001v0t5e6hhrh9la@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58364 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you,
>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face
>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see
>>>>>those characters as a single quote?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Only one to notice.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.
>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU.
>>
>
>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be
>able to read minds now?
>
You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to
argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my
asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your
response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU
run a poll, dipshit?
>>>
>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.
>>>
>>
>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why
>> do they all hate you so, Jim?
>>
>
>"caterwauling"?
>
Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in
future so that perhaps you can follow along.
>
>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>
Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking
them? Just a thought.
>>>
>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>
>>
>> Really? On what planet?
>
>All of them.
>
Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar?
>
>
>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat
>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a
>> complaint about the state of the meat.
>>
>
>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.
>
So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.
So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where
English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is
unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.
>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".
>
>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>
You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.
Perhaps that's the case with you, but the rest of us aren't like you.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or
>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the
>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's
>>>> always the other guy.
>>>
>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on
>>>about it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why did you bring it up?
>>>
>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.
>>>
>>
>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.
>
>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>
You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to
simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual
'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it?
>
>If anyone is caterwauling it is you.
>
Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you...
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 21:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ak38uc-jfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58372 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you, >>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face >>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see >>>>>>those characters as a single quote? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim? >>>>> >>>> >>>>Only one to notice. >>>> >>> >>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it. >>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU. >>> >> >>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be >>able to read minds now? >> > > You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to > argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my > asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your > response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU > run a poll, dipshit? What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar. Look two sentences above your lie. >>>> >>>>Only one to make the effort to comment. >>>> >>> >>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why >>> do they all hate you so, Jim? >>> >> >>"caterwauling"? >> > > Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in > future so that perhaps you can follow along. > >> >>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>about something that has nothing to do with you. >> > > Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking > them? Just a thought. If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>> >>> >>> Really? On what planet? >> >>All of them. >> > > Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar? > >> >> >>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat >>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a >>> complaint about the state of the meat. >>> >> >>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well. >> > > So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'. > So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where > English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is > unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory. > >>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint". >> >>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >> > > You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue. Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint. > >>>>>> >>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or >>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the >>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's >>>>> always the other guy. >>>> >>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on >>>>about it. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why did you bring it up? >>>> >>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem. >>>> >>> >>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it. >> >>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >> > > You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to > simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual > 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it? > >> >>If anyone is caterwauling it is you. >> > > Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you... You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something that has absolutely nothing to do with you. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 16:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f2s2hbhiq497bnrd9g0esf9dd255dk5c0t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58392 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you,
>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face
>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see
>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Only one to notice.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.
>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU.
>>>>
>>>
>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be
>>>able to read minds now?
>>>
>>
>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to
>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my
>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your
>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU
>> run a poll, dipshit?
>
>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.
>
You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I*
said. See above, where your answer to why you are the only one
complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words,
nobody else saw it.
>
>Look two sentences above your lie.
>
Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".
>>>>>
>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why
>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?
>>>>
>>>
>>>"caterwauling"?
>>>
>>
>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in
>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.
>>
>>>
>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking
>> them? Just a thought.
>>
>
>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>
You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing
makes it everyone's business.
>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Really? On what planet?
>>>
>>>All of them.
>>>
>>
>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar?
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat
>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a
>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.
>>>
>>
>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.
>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where
>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is
>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.
>>
>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".
>>>
>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>
>>
>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.
>
>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.
>
Where did you get that from? Wow, you are just delusional.
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or
>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the
>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's
>>>>>> always the other guy.
>>>>>
>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on
>>>>>about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you bring it up?
>>>>>
>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.
>>>
>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>>>
>>
>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to
>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual
>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it?
>>
>>>
>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you...
>>
>
>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>
I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp.
Usenet isn't email, remember?
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 23:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jfb8uc-5ge.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58400 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you, >>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face >>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see >>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Only one to notice. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it. >>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU. >>>>> >>>> >>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be >>>>able to read minds now? >>>> >>> >>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to >>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my >>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your >>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU >>> run a poll, dipshit? >> >>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar. >> > > You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I* > said. In English please. > See above, where your answer to why you are the only one > complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words, > nobody else saw it. YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons. You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth. >> >>Look two sentences above your lie. >> > > Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice". Look at the list where that is one of many. > >>>>>> >>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why >>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim? >>>>> >>>> >>>>"caterwauling"? >>>> >>> >>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in >>> future so that perhaps you can follow along. >>> >>>> >>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>>>about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>> >>> >>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking >>> them? Just a thought. >>> >> >>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>about something that has nothing to do with you. >> > > You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing > makes it everyone's business. I am responding whatever YOU posted to. If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue. >>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Really? On what planet? >>>> >>>>All of them. >>>> >>> >>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar? >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat >>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a >>>>> complaint about the state of the meat. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well. >>>> >>> >>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'. >>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where >>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is >>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory. >>> >>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint". >>>> >>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>> >>> >>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue. >> >>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint. >> > > Where did you get that from? From YOUR diatribe on the subject. >>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or >>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the >>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's >>>>>>> always the other guy. >>>>>> >>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on >>>>>>about it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why did you bring it up? >>>>>> >>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it. >>>> >>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >>>> >>> >>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to >>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual >>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it? >>> >>>> >>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you... >>> >> >>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >> > > I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp. > > Usenet isn't email, remember? What does email have to do with anything, space cadet, or is that the only red herring you could think of at the moment? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 02:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8124hbt0do1pgiftnskavohbe8h5h268ff@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58404 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face
>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see
>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Only one to notice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.
>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be
>>>>>able to read minds now?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to
>>>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my
>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your
>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU
>>>> run a poll, dipshit?
>>>
>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.
>>>
>>
>> You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I*
>> said.
>
>In English please.
>
That is English. I'm sorry, are the words to big for you?
>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one
>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words,
>> nobody else saw it.
>
>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.
>
And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you.
>
>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.
>
And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up
its ass.
>>>
>>>Look two sentences above your lie.
>>>
>>
>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".
>
>Look at the list where that is one of many.
>
Irrelevant. You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING
with you.
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why
>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"caterwauling"?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in
>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking
>>>> them? Just a thought.
>>>>
>>>
>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>
>>
>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing
>> makes it everyone's business.
>>
>
>I am responding whatever YOU posted to.
>
Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp.
>
>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.
>
Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you post this to ANY
newsgroup in the first place?
>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really? On what planet?
>>>>>
>>>>>All of them.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat
>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a
>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.
>>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where
>>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is
>>>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.
>>>>
>>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".
>>>>>
>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.
>>>
>>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.
>>>
>>
>> Where did you get that from?
>>
>
>From YOUR diatribe on the subject.
>
And once again we see that Chimp Just Can't Read. YOU complained in a
public newsgroup that someone was (according to you) doing something
that "isn't RFC compliant". That's a COMPLAINT, Chimp, which is why
you ranted on and on about it to the point of killfiling the
'offender'. Then you claimed "A statement of fact is not a
complaint." When I point out that it most certainly can be, you stand
on your head and claim I've once again said something that I never
said (that all statements of fact are complaints).
If you didn't want everyone on the newsgroup involved, WHY DID YOU
POST YOUR COMPLAINT THERE?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or
>>>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the
>>>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's
>>>>>>>> always the other guy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on
>>>>>>>about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why did you bring it up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to
>>>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual
>>>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you...
>>>>
>>>
>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>>>
>>
>> I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp.
>>
>> Usenet isn't email, remember?
>>
>
>What does email have to do with anything, space cadet, or is that the
>only red herring you could think of at the moment?
>
What email has to do with anything, chimp, is that if you think what
you had to say isn't anyone's business but the gentleman you were
complaining about and you, email is the proper tool for that exchange.
Since you obviously thought it was the business of the entire cluster
of newsgroups you posted it to (because you posted it there), it's
rather stupid for you to complain about how it "has absolutely nothing
to do with [me]" now. If you believe that, YOU SHOULD HAVE SENT YOUR
COMPLAINT IN EMAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Usenet isn't email, chimp.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 16:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lk7auc-2mk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58409 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face >>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see >>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Only one to notice. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it. >>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be >>>>>>able to read minds now? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to >>>>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my >>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your >>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU >>>>> run a poll, dipshit? >>>> >>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar. >>>> >>> >>> You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I* >>> said. >> >>In English please. >> > > That is English. I'm sorry, are the words to big for you? > >>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one >>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words, >>> nobody else saw it. >> >>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons. >> > > And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you. > >> >>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth. >> > > And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up > its ass. > >>>> >>>>Look two sentences above your lie. >>>> >>> >>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice". >> >>Look at the list where that is one of many. >> > > Irrelevant. You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING > with you. > >>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why >>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"caterwauling"? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in >>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking >>>>> them? Just a thought. >>>>> >>>> >>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>>>about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>> >>> >>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing >>> makes it everyone's business. >>> >> >>I am responding whatever YOU posted to. >> > > Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp. > >> >>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue. >> > > Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you post this to ANY > newsgroup in the first place? > >>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really? On what planet? >>>>>> >>>>>>All of them. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat >>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a >>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'. >>>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where >>>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is >>>>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory. >>>>> >>>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint". >>>>>> >>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue. >>>> >>>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint. >>>> >>> >>> Where did you get that from? >>> >> >>From YOUR diatribe on the subject. >> > > And once again we see that Chimp Just Can't Read. YOU complained in a > public newsgroup that someone was (according to you) doing something > that "isn't RFC compliant". That's a COMPLAINT, Chimp, which is why > you ranted on and on about it to the point of killfiling the > 'offender'. Then you claimed "A statement of fact is not a > complaint." When I point out that it most certainly can be, you stand > on your head and claim I've once again said something that I never > said (that all statements of fact are complaints). > > If you didn't want everyone on the newsgroup involved, WHY DID YOU > POST YOUR COMPLAINT THERE? > >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or >>>>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the >>>>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's >>>>>>>>> always the other guy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on >>>>>>>>about it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why did you bring it up? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it. >>>>>> >>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to >>>>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual >>>>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you... >>>>> >>>> >>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >>>> >>> >>> I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp. >>> >>> Usenet isn't email, remember? >>> >> >>What does email have to do with anything, space cadet, or is that the >>only red herring you could think of at the moment? >> > > What email has to do with anything, chimp, is that if you think what > you had to say isn't anyone's business but the gentleman you were > complaining about and you, email is the proper tool for that exchange. > Since you obviously thought it was the business of the entire cluster > of newsgroups you posted it to (because you posted it there), it's > rather stupid for you to complain about how it "has absolutely nothing > to do with [me]" now. If you believe that, YOU SHOULD HAVE SENT YOUR > COMPLAINT IN EMAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE. > > Usenet isn't email, chimp. Says the denier every bit as wacko as the Holocaust deniers. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 11:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4t05hbti9ese447v4f2la91oim5edlirv6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58416 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face
>>>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see
>>>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Only one to notice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.
>>>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be
>>>>>>>able to read minds now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to
>>>>>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my
>>>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your
>>>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU
>>>>>> run a poll, dipshit?
>>>>>
>>>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I*
>>>> said.
>>>
>>>In English please.
>>>
>>
>> That is English. I'm sorry, are the words to big for you?
>>
>>>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one
>>>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words,
>>>> nobody else saw it.
>>>
>>>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.
>>>
>>
>> And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you.
>>
>>>
>>>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.
>>>
>>
>> And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up
>> its ass.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Look two sentences above your lie.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".
>>>
>>>Look at the list where that is one of many.
>>>
>>
>> Irrelevant. You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING
>> with you.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why
>>>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"caterwauling"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in
>>>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking
>>>>>> them? Just a thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing
>>>> makes it everyone's business.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I am responding whatever YOU posted to.
>>>
>>
>> Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp.
>>
>>>
>>>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.
>>>
>>
>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you post this to ANY
>> newsgroup in the first place?
>>
>>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really? On what planet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>All of them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat
>>>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a
>>>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.
>>>>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where
>>>>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is
>>>>>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Where did you get that from?
>>>>
>>>
>>>From YOUR diatribe on the subject.
>>>
>>
>> And once again we see that Chimp Just Can't Read. YOU complained in a
>> public newsgroup that someone was (according to you) doing something
>> that "isn't RFC compliant". That's a COMPLAINT, Chimp, which is why
>> you ranted on and on about it to the point of killfiling the
>> 'offender'. Then you claimed "A statement of fact is not a
>> complaint." When I point out that it most certainly can be, you stand
>> on your head and claim I've once again said something that I never
>> said (that all statements of fact are complaints).
>>
>> If you didn't want everyone on the newsgroup involved, WHY DID YOU
>> POST YOUR COMPLAINT THERE?
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the
>>>>>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's
>>>>>>>>>> always the other guy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on
>>>>>>>>>about it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why did you bring it up?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>>>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to
>>>>>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual
>>>>>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp.
>>>>
>>>> Usenet isn't email, remember?
>>>>
>>>
>>>What does email have to do with anything, space cadet, or is that the
>>>only red herring you could think of at the moment?
>>>
>>
>> What email has to do with anything, chimp, is that if you think what
>> you had to say isn't anyone's business but the gentleman you were
>> complaining about and you, email is the proper tool for that exchange.
>> Since you obviously thought it was the business of the entire cluster
>> of newsgroups you posted it to (because you posted it there), it's
>> rather stupid for you to complain about how it "has absolutely nothing
>> to do with [me]" now. If you believe that, YOU SHOULD HAVE SENT YOUR
>> COMPLAINT IN EMAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE.
>>
>> Usenet isn't email, chimp.
>
>Says the denier every bit as wacko as the Holocaust deniers.
>
You're a lying sack of shit, Jim.
--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 19:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <v0gauc-4gl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58420 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face >>>>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see >>>>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Only one to notice. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it. >>>>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be >>>>>>>>able to read minds now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to >>>>>>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my >>>>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your >>>>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU >>>>>>> run a poll, dipshit? >>>>>> >>>>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I* >>>>> said. >>>> >>>>In English please. >>>> >>> >>> That is English. I'm sorry, are the words to big for you? >>> >>>>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one >>>>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words, >>>>> nobody else saw it. >>>> >>>>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons. >>>> >>> >>> And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you. >>> >>>> >>>>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth. >>>> >>> >>> And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up >>> its ass. >>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Look two sentences above your lie. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice". >>>> >>>>Look at the list where that is one of many. >>>> >>> >>> Irrelevant. You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING >>> with you. >>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why >>>>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"caterwauling"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in >>>>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking >>>>>>> them? Just a thought. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing >>>>> makes it everyone's business. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I am responding whatever YOU posted to. >>>> >>> >>> Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp. >>> >>>> >>>>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue. >>>> >>> >>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you post this to ANY >>> newsgroup in the first place? >>> >>>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Really? On what planet? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>All of them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat >>>>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a >>>>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'. >>>>>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where >>>>>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is >>>>>>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue. >>>>>> >>>>>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where did you get that from? >>>>> >>>> >>>>From YOUR diatribe on the subject. >>>> >>> >>> And once again we see that Chimp Just Can't Read. YOU complained in a >>> public newsgroup that someone was (according to you) doing something >>> that "isn't RFC compliant". That's a COMPLAINT, Chimp, which is why >>> you ranted on and on about it to the point of killfiling the >>> 'offender'. Then you claimed "A statement of fact is not a >>> complaint." When I point out that it most certainly can be, you stand >>> on your head and claim I've once again said something that I never >>> said (that all statements of fact are complaints). >>> >>> If you didn't want everyone on the newsgroup involved, WHY DID YOU >>> POST YOUR COMPLAINT THERE? >>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the >>>>>>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's >>>>>>>>>>> always the other guy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on >>>>>>>>>>about it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why did you bring it up? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>>>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to >>>>>>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual >>>>>>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp. >>>>> >>>>> Usenet isn't email, remember? >>>>> >>>> >>>>What does email have to do with anything, space cadet, or is that the >>>>only red herring you could think of at the moment? >>>> >>> >>> What email has to do with anything, chimp, is that if you think what >>> you had to say isn't anyone's business but the gentleman you were >>> complaining about and you, email is the proper tool for that exchange. >>> Since you obviously thought it was the business of the entire cluster >>> of newsgroups you posted it to (because you posted it there), it's >>> rather stupid for you to complain about how it "has absolutely nothing >>> to do with [me]" now. If you believe that, YOU SHOULD HAVE SENT YOUR >>> COMPLAINT IN EMAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE. >>> >>> Usenet isn't email, chimp. >> >>Says the denier every bit as wacko as the Holocaust deniers. >> > > You're a lying sack of shit, Jim. Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 12:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3365hbh2s1iekchb26q13kl2ljs4gmm10q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58425 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Only one to notice.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.
>>>>>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be
>>>>>>>>>able to read minds now?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to
>>>>>>>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my
>>>>>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your
>>>>>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU
>>>>>>>> run a poll, dipshit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I*
>>>>>> said.
>>>>>
>>>>>In English please.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is English. I'm sorry, are the words to big for you?
>>>>
>>>>>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one
>>>>>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words,
>>>>>> nobody else saw it.
>>>>>
>>>>>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up
>>>> its ass.
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Look two sentences above your lie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".
>>>>>
>>>>>Look at the list where that is one of many.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant. You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING
>>>> with you.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why
>>>>>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"caterwauling"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in
>>>>>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking
>>>>>>>> them? Just a thought.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing
>>>>>> makes it everyone's business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I am responding whatever YOU posted to.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you post this to ANY
>>>> newsgroup in the first place?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Really? On what planet?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>All of them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat
>>>>>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a
>>>>>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.
>>>>>>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where
>>>>>>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is
>>>>>>>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where did you get that from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>From YOUR diatribe on the subject.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And once again we see that Chimp Just Can't Read. YOU complained in a
>>>> public newsgroup that someone was (according to you) doing something
>>>> that "isn't RFC compliant". That's a COMPLAINT, Chimp, which is why
>>>> you ranted on and on about it to the point of killfiling the
>>>> 'offender'. Then you claimed "A statement of fact is not a
>>>> complaint." When I point out that it most certainly can be, you stand
>>>> on your head and claim I've once again said something that I never
>>>> said (that all statements of fact are complaints).
>>>>
>>>> If you didn't want everyone on the newsgroup involved, WHY DID YOU
>>>> POST YOUR COMPLAINT THERE?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's
>>>>>>>>>>>> always the other guy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on
>>>>>>>>>>>about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did you bring it up?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>>>>>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to
>>>>>>>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual
>>>>>>>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something
>>>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Usenet isn't email, remember?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What does email have to do with anything, space cadet, or is that the
>>>>>only red herring you could think of at the moment?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What email has to do with anything, chimp, is that if you think what
>>>> you had to say isn't anyone's business but the gentleman you were
>>>> complaining about and you, email is the proper tool for that exchange.
>>>> Since you obviously thought it was the business of the entire cluster
>>>> of newsgroups you posted it to (because you posted it there), it's
>>>> rather stupid for you to complain about how it "has absolutely nothing
>>>> to do with [me]" now. If you believe that, YOU SHOULD HAVE SENT YOUR
>>>> COMPLAINT IN EMAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE.
>>>>
>>>> Usenet isn't email, chimp.
>>>
>>>Says the denier every bit as wacko as the Holocaust deniers.
>>>
>>
>> You're a lying sack of shit, Jim.
>
>Racist deniers aren't worth talking to.
>
Yet here you are, lying like the sack of shit that you are.
--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 19:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <n9mogbhak0pakl43glss5mu6ruf3l3dg13@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58203 |
Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>For your reference, records indicate that
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>
>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>> newsreader.
>
>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don’t blame me
>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>
You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't
conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
--
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore,
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
--George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 18:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <63rvtc-3gf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58215 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: > >>For your reference, records indicate that >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>> >>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII >>> newsreader. >> >>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me >>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade. >> > > You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't > conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations. You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 15:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ustqgbt6gr8nfio2kpp2q1itcea66i47u9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58238 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>
>>>For your reference, records indicate that
>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>> newsreader.
>>>
>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me
>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>
>>
>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>
>
>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences.
>
You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just
fine but you. Where do you think the problem is?
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 23:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <66c0uc-ndh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58246 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>> >>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII >>>>> newsreader. >>>> >>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me >>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade. >>>> >>> >>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't >>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations. >>> >> >>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. >> > > You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a > problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just > fine but you. Where do you think the problem is? The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed to be ASCII text. How do you know everyone can read it fine? Have you taken a poll and separated that out to those using a browser and those using a real newsreader? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 22:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57lrgbt0iuir5tetukdvfguv5ikvjlkcuv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58251 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>
>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me
>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences.
>>>
>>
>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>> problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just
>> fine but you. Where do you think the problem is?
>>
>
>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>to be ASCII text.
>
I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
render a character correctly.
>
>How do you know everyone can read it fine?
>
Because no one is complaining but you.
>
>Have you taken a poll and separated that out to those using a browser
>and those using a real newsreader?
>
No, dear boy. I apply sane thinking, instead. Meanwhile, you take
the crazy person path and insist that it must be everyone else and not
you.
Fact: I'm using a newsreader. His posts look fine to me. Only Jimp
the Chimp is complaining. Perhaps Jimp the Chimp needs to investigate
how to get proper character support on his newsreader and OS?
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 18:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ife2uc-qvn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58260 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII >>>>>>> newsreader. >>>>>> >>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me >>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't >>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations. >>>>> >>>> >>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. >>>> >>> >>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a >>> problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just >>> fine but you. Where do you think the problem is? >>> >> >>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed >>to be ASCII text. >> > > I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to > render a character correctly. Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading. As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences, which is a SERIES of characters, not A character. The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 13:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g69tgb9fm8hb50q3ehkt5534o2i1vof4lu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58277 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII
>>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me
>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't
>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a
>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just
>>>> fine but you. Where do you think the problem is?
>>>>
>>>
>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed
>>>to be ASCII text.
>>>
>>
>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to
>> render a character correctly.
>>
>
>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading.
>
>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences,
>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character.
>
>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII.
>
Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem. Anyone sane would say
that means that it's most likely that the problem is on your end. You,
however, immediately assume that the problem is with the sender, even
though his articles look fine to everyone else.
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 20:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mcn2uc-67p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58285 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII >>>>>>>>> newsreader. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me >>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't >>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a >>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just >>>>> fine but you. Where do you think the problem is? >>>>> >>>> >>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed >>>>to be ASCII text. >>>> >>> >>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to >>> render a character correctly. >>> >> >>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading. >> >>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences, >>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character. >> >>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII. >> > > Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem. No, I am the only one mentioning it. Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know what others see. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 19:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <igvtgb9sp23l7k53vriei2s1kqr7fgvcuk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58293 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII >>>>>>>>>> newsreader. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me >>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't >>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a >>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just >>>>>> fine but you. Where do you think the problem is? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed >>>>>to be ASCII text. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to >>>> render a character correctly. >>>> >>> >>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading. >>> >>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences, >>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character. >>> >>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII. >>> >> >> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem. >> > >No, I am the only one mentioning it. > >Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know >what others see. > So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much that they're remaining silent even though they see the issue just to irk you? Get off it, Jim. You are the only demonstrated 'non-compliance' here. -- You are What you do When it counts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 04:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2nh3uc-qrr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #58300 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Learn to use the ' key, your posts are basically unreadable in an ASCII >>>>>>>>>>> newsreader. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>The default encoding on Usenet has been UTF-8 since 2006. Don?t blame me >>>>>>>>>>if tin developers have sat on their hands for the last decade. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You don't understand, Doc. It's the world's fault that it doesn't >>>>>>>>> conform to the chimp's expectations and limitations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You don't understand the difference between UTF-8 and escape sequences. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between only Jim is having a >>>>>>> problem and someone else doing it wrong. Everyone can read it just >>>>>>> fine but you. Where do you think the problem is? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>The problem is the poster putting escape sequences into what is suupposed >>>>>>to be ASCII text. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'd bet the problem is the chimp's newsreader or OS not being able to >>>>> render a character correctly. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Then you would be wrong as well as being incapable of reading. >>>> >>>>As I have now said many times, the posts contain escape sequences, >>>>which is a SERIES of characters, not A character. >>>> >>>>The first 128 characters of Unicode correspond one-to-one with ASCII. >>>> >>> >>> Jim, you are the only one seeing a problem. >>> >> >>No, I am the only one mentioning it. >> >>Unless you have taken a poll of all USENET users, you don't know >>what others see. >> > > So your premise is that everyone else hates you so much There go those voices in your head again. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 20 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 18 19 [20] 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.astro
csiph-web