Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.astro > #57738

Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:37:10 -0600
Message-ID <56BA3FE1.7FB9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:37:05 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.astro
Subject Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision?
References <dPqdnSyaPpEcxjDLnZ2dnUU7-b3OydjZ@giganews.com> <n8om4s$gp6$1@dont-email.me> <rLOdnXy-3tZHZjLLnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56B056FB.522D@ix.netcom.com> <56B142DA.1ECD@ix.netcom.com> <n8vdbu$1qir$1@gioia.aioe.org> <56B3A803.229B@ix.netcom.com> <n914ar$g13$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B42852.31BE@ix.netcom.com> <56B5BAD2.29AC@ix.netcom.com> <n95egv$51f$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B65D2D.7A0C@ix.netcom.com> <n966jo$akb$1@pcls7.std.com> <56B7BCFB.6148@ix.netcom.com> <56B7CF09.284@ix.netcom.com> <56B7DE57.67B4@ix.netcom.com> <56B97AD2.C3E@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 101
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 162.239.141.5
X-Trace sv3-adao4AlrtTVkSSvYp+s+f+XjWHgxfTlacBAyZPXOGz37INP0A62CwJDhxWUlfg0h7lzb45Z+E2pVzSl!unWOb13kRwRfCXeFNdJNya7IgJaoV4/xYVAyZrKYNK03C2ruZFI4vfrmxo0b4gViUMGoA/Tr3ySZ!Rs4PysiZag==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 6129
Xref csiph.com alt.astronomy:281890 sci.physics:551766 sci.physics.relativity:375867 rec.arts.sf.written:432988 sci.astro:57738

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >> Babbling nonsense.  Read up on the water cycle.  Water drawn up in plants
> > > > > >> (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component
> > > > > >> of the water cycle.
> > > > >
> > > > > >What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about
> > > > > >the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."?
> > > > >
> > > > > Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the
> > > > > sun) is a minor component.  The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and
> > > > > "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle.
> > > > > The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water
> > > > > cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by
> > > > > using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water
> > > > > from the ocean (and is affected by tides).
> > > >
> > > > I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'.
> > > >
> > > > That means you don't know much...
> > > > https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws
> > > >
> > > > Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) ..
> > > >
> > > > this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the
> > > > ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions
> > > > of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean.
> > > >
> > > > In other words...
> > > >
> > > > the earth's moon makes the ocean.
> > > >
> > > > All from a single drop of water on a leaf.
> > > >
> > > > http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364C705A437130394F77714B31687A7047493438444F76714E716B673D3D/water-drops-on-leaf.jpg
> > > >
> > > > Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees.
> > > >
> > > > Do you want me to explain How that works?
> > > >
> > > > Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia.
> > > >
> > > > Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine:
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg
> > >
> > > https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB
> > >
> > > of course Science is a few thousand years behind...
> > > they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works.
> > >
> > > https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=dGDQfjNjst89oGMGZUuvCejqvO6-M&q=moon+tides&lr=English&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-2qy64ebKAhVM5CYKHV3ABI8QqgIIJDAB
> > >
> > > wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees:
> > >  http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg
> > >
> > > man! yous guys are soooo behind the  times.
> > >
> > > yous just don't get it.
> > >
> > > I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years.
> >
> > what you people
> > don't understand...
> > is that the earth's moon
> > is instrumental in the
> > origin of the ocean
> > the origin of fishes
> > the origin of people
> > the origin of Life on Earth.
> >
> > Simply by it's gravitational pull on the earth and it's atmosphere.
> >
> > What came first, the rain or the clouds?
> 
> Of course the answer is simple...the moon made the clouds and then it made it rain.
> 
> How did the moon make clouds? Instead of rainfall, it rainup.
> 
> Sorry, I cannot wait for yous people to invent the word "rainup".
> 
> Maybe a thousand years from now you'll figure it out....especially yous Wikipedia university students.


Now, as you see on the cover of the first issue of the Science Journal is shows a photograph of a leafinsect.

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg


You're problably wondering, how did the leaf that fell from a tree turn into an insect????

Back to sci.astro | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Moon was produced by head-on collision? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 19:55 -0500
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 22:17 -0600
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-01-31 07:25 -0800
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-31 09:44 -0800
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-01-31 17:02 -0800
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-31 23:10 -0800
      Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 03:13 -0500
        Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 10:36 -0800
  Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-01 22:27 +0000
    Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 19:44 -0500
      Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 23:12 -0800
        Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-02-02 05:57 -0800
        Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 15:59 -0800
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-02 22:14 -0800
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-03 14:23 -0800
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-04 11:40 +0000
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 11:35 -0800
              Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 03:18 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 20:42 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 08:46 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 15:26 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 15:39 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-02-05 12:55 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-05 21:48 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-05 22:31 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2016-02-05 22:50 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-11 19:44 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:41 -0600
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 01:20 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-06 18:37 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-06 12:53 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-07 01:28 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-02-07 07:06 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 02:58 +0000
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 06:35 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 13:54 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 15:11 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-07 16:16 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-08 21:36 -0800
                Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:37 -0800
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0800
      Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) - 2016-02-03 22:16 +0000
        Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-03 22:22 -0800
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-03 22:38 -0800
            Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-04 11:46 -0800
              Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? the_shadow <the_shadow@xcoxx.net> - 2016-02-06 07:30 +0000
          Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-02-04 07:52 -0800

csiph-web