Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > rec.music.industrial > #899 > unrolled thread

Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival

Started byXx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com>
First post2025-03-14 03:32 -0500
Last post2025-03-29 18:09 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 57 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to rec.music.industrial

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-14 03:32 -0500
    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival "Abaddon Belial" <Abaddon@hell.com> - 2025-03-14 15:07 +0000
    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-03-15 00:47 -0400
    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-14 22:50 -0600
      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-16 08:09 -0500
        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-17 09:55 -0400
          Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-17 17:30 -0500
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-17 23:10 -0400
              Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Jackie Cage <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> - 2025-03-18 03:53 -0500
                Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-18 06:09 -0400
                  Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 11:57 -0500
                    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 11:32 -0700
                      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 17:38 -0500
                    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-26 05:59 -0400
                      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 19:46 -0500
                        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-27 09:04 -0400
                          Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 08:28 -0500
                            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-27 16:13 -0400
                              Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 13:40 -0500
        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-23 23:52 -0600
    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-17 09:55 -0400
      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Alan Bond <bondrock@ifx.net> - 2025-03-17 08:56 -0700
        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-17 20:43 +0000
        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-17 17:46 -0400
          Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Jackie Cage <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> - 2025-03-18 03:55 -0500
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-18 06:10 -0400
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-03-18 07:10 -0700
              Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 11:59 -0500
                Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 11:33 -0700
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-19 03:38 +0000
              Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 12:00 -0500
      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-03-17 09:46 -0700
        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-17 17:47 -0400
          Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-03-17 15:53 -0700
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-17 23:11 -0400
          Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Jackie Cage <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> - 2025-03-18 03:56 -0500
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-03-18 07:12 -0700
        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Jackie Cage <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> - 2025-03-18 03:55 -0500
          Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-03-18 07:15 -0700
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 12:05 -0500
      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-17 17:31 -0500
        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-17 23:12 -0400
          Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 12:06 -0500
            Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-03-26 06:02 -0400
              Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-28 10:48 +0000
                Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 12:25 -0500
                  Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-28 20:19 +0000
                  Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-28 16:19 -0700
                    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 21:42 -0500
                      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-28 21:25 -0700
                    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-29 07:01 +0000
                      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 07:07 -0500
                        Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-29 18:08 +0000
                Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 13:38 -0500
                  Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-29 05:00 +0000
                    Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 07:06 -0500
                      Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-29 18:09 +0000

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →


#899 — Re: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival

FromXx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com>
Date2025-03-14 03:32 -0500
SubjectRe: The Great Kansas Satanic Statehouse Festival
Message-ID<m3i7t9Fb9qlU1@mid.individual.net>
c186282 wrote:
> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
> 
> 
> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
> 
> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
> 
> . . .
> 
>    Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>    let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>    exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.

Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
-- 
1.11 hrs the number of the beast You try to keep me in cages But baby
you got to catch me first You think your love is contagious I do my best
you cant do your worst "Nonsense." --Joannis PapaOomMowMow

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#900

From"Abaddon Belial" <Abaddon@hell.com>
Date2025-03-14 15:07 +0000
Message-ID<HCXAP.88913$bYQ4.12737@fx41.iad>
In reply to#899
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:

> c186282 wrote:
> > https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-s
> > atanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryP
> > osition=undefined    Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists
> > From Performing ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
> > 
> > Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
> > within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
> > 
> > . . .
> > 
> >   Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
> >   let Xians do religious events there then they can't
> >   exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
> 

> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.


I beg to differ. There are many of us who are completely devoted to Our
Lord Satan.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#901

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2025-03-15 00:47 -0400
Message-ID<ICWdnSSEt7vym0j6nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#899
On 3/14/25 4:32 AM, Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
> c186282 wrote:
>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
>>
>>
>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>
>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>
>> . . .
>>
>>    Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>    let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>    exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
> 
> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.

   Sure it is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#902

FromGronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
Date2025-03-14 22:50 -0600
Message-ID<vr30ue$2r9ma$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#899
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
> c186282 wrote:
>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
>>
>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>
>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>> . . .
>>
>>    Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>    let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>    exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
> 
> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.

Why not? What is it defined in relation to?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#903

FromXx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com>
Date2025-03-16 08:09 -0500
Message-ID<m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#902
Gronk wrote:
> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
>> c186282 wrote:
>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
>>>
>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>
>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>> . . .
>>>
>>>    Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>    let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>    exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>
>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
> 
> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity

-- 
1.11 hrs the number of the beast You try to keep me in cages But baby
you got to catch me first You think your love is contagious I do my best
you cant do your worst "Nonsense." --Joannis PapaOomMowMow

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#905

FromAttila <prochoice@here.now>
Date2025-03-17 09:55 -0400
Message-ID<6eagtjtk9lvr6r5frktemqpvb4bcut3256@4ax.com>
In reply to#903
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
<xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:

>Gronk wrote:
>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
>>>>
>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>
>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>> . . .
>>>>
>>>>    Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>    let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>    exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>
>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>> 
>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity

By some other silly superstition?

-- 


Build a wall.
Deport them all.

Every illegal is a criminal.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

DEI DEATH CERTIFICATE

Date - Jan 20, 2025
Time - 12:00 Noon

"Joe who?"

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#911

FromXx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com>
Date2025-03-17 17:30 -0500
Message-ID<m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#905
Attila wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
> 
>> Gronk wrote:
>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>
>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>> . . .
>>>>>
>>>>>     Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>     let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>     exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>
>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>
>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
> 
> By some other silly superstition?
> 
Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?

-- 
1.11 hrs the number of the beast You try to keep me in cages But baby
you got to catch me first You think your love is contagious I do my best
you cant do your worst "Nonsense." --Joannis PapaOomMowMow

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#914

FromAttila <prochoice@here.now>
Date2025-03-17 23:10 -0400
Message-ID<8uohtjp3rp39oem0ri0lk2l917onuhjs6v@4ax.com>
In reply to#911
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
<xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:

>Attila wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>     let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>     exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>
>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>> 
>> By some other silly superstition?
>> 
>Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?

It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?

-- 


Build a wall.
Deport them all.

Every illegal is a criminal.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

DEI DEATH CERTIFICATE

Date - Jan 20, 2025
Time - 12:00 Noon

"Joe who?"

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#917

FromJackie Cage <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com>
Date2025-03-18 03:53 -0500
Message-ID<m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#914
Attila wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
> 
>> Attila wrote:
>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>      let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>      exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>
>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>
>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
> 
> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
> 
Because your last question was
   "Who wrote the prophecy?"

-- 
1 left and 1 LEFT make 1 right

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#921

FromAttila <prochoice@here.now>
Date2025-03-18 06:09 -0400
Message-ID<bfhitjpvmsflkdan0bsqoe3vqqvrfi46uj@4ax.com>
In reply to#917
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
<lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:

>Attila wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Attila wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>      let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>      exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>
>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>
>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>> 
>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>> 
>Because your last question was
>   "Who wrote the prophecy?"

My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.

Prophesies are WAG's.

-- 


Build a wall.
Deport them all.

Every illegal is a criminal.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

DEI DEATH CERTIFICATE

Date - Jan 20, 2025
Time - 12:00 Noon

"Joe who?"

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#928

From.../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com>
Date2025-03-25 11:57 -0500
Message-ID<m4g5k4F15jU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#921
Attila wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
> 
>> Attila wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>       let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>       exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>
>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>
>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>
>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>
>> Because your last question was
>>    "Who wrote the prophecy?"
> 
> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
> 
> Prophesies are WAG's.
> 

I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted 
to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post 
doesn't make any sense.
-- 
You're the future of fire
You're the witness of war
You're the irony of justice
And the father of law
Been waiting for awhile to meet you
For the chance to shake your hand
To give you thanks for all the sufferin' you command

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#933

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-03-25 11:32 -0700
Message-ID<4tOcnaekKexLa3_6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#928
.../v]andrak|≡... wrote:
> Attila wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Attila wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>       let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>       exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a 
>>>>>>>>> religious term.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>
>>> Because your last question was
>>>    "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>>
>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>>
>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>>
> 
> I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted 
> to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post 
> doesn't make any sense.

yes it does

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#935

From.../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com>
Date2025-03-25 17:38 -0500
Message-ID<m4gpioF3636U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#933
% wrote:
> .../v]andrak|≡... wrote:
>> Attila wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every 
>>>>>>>>>>> satanist
>>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>>       let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>>       exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a 
>>>>>>>>>> religious term.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>>
>>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>>
>>>> Because your last question was
>>>>    "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>>>
>>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>>>
>>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>>>
>>
>> I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he 
>> predicted to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your 
>> post doesn't make any sense.
> 
> yes it does

Don't place faith in human beings - human beings are butterfly wings. 
Nostradamus was some kind of Dark Saint on the other hand.  Not one of 
his prophecies were wrong although he did couch some of them in cryptic 
language.

For example people were saying the village idiot come to reign was G W B 
but I'm pretty sure it was Planktont in his short internet run.  The kid 
thinks he's Alexander the Paintchipeater.  They think that your early 
ending was ALL wrong.  That's why I say hey man nice shot.  You're a 
good shot man.  It's time to recruit.
-- 
You're the future of fire
You're the witness of war
You're the irony of justice
And the father of law
Been waiting for awhile to meet you
For the chance to shake your hand
To give you thanks for all the sufferin' you command

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#936

FromAttila <prochoice@here.now>
Date2025-03-26 05:59 -0400
Message-ID<sqj7ujptouhu7m2skp02hehok77gnp36ki@4ax.com>
In reply to#928
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:57:42 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
<jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<m4g5k4F15jU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:

>Attila wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Attila wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>       let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>       exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>
>>> Because your last question was
>>>    "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>> 
>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>> 
>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>> 
>
>I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted 
>to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post 
>doesn't make any sense.

Make enough and the odds are one or more may be accidentally
right.  Of course making a prediction about when your grave
would be robbed is about as meaningless as they come.

I was accused of saying "Who wrote the prophecy?".  I did
not say that.

-- 


Build a wall.
Deport them all.

Every illegal is a criminal.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

DEI DEATH CERTIFICATE

Date - Jan 20, 2025
Time - 12:00 Noon

"Joe who?"

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#938

From.../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com>
Date2025-03-26 19:46 -0500
Message-ID<m4jlf1F5i5jU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#936
Attila wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:57:42 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <m4g5k4F15jU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
> 
>> Attila wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>        Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>>        let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>>        exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>>
>>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>>
>>>> Because your last question was
>>>>     "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>>>
>>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>>>
>>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>>>
>>
>> I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted
>> to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post
>> doesn't make any sense.
> 
> Make enough and the odds are one or more may be accidentally
> right.  Of course making a prediction about when your grave
> would be robbed is about as meaningless as they come.

You don't know half the story.  He also said the guy could gain his 
powers by drinking wine out of his skull, and that he would die that 
very night, which he did by a stray bullet in the Italian war.

> I was accused of saying "Who wrote the prophecy?".  I did
> not say that.
> 

Paraphrased...  Tell me what you said and let's compare.
-- 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ2SDPrXQFk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#941

FromAttila <prochoice@here.now>
Date2025-03-27 09:04 -0400
Message-ID<rviaujtmdm4k6pabqdbmt1eglaj1in5cl3@4ax.com>
In reply to#938
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:46:26 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
<jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<m4jlf1F5i5jU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:

>Attila wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:57:42 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
>> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <m4g5k4F15jU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Attila wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>>>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>>>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>        Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>>>        let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>        exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Because your last question was
>>>>>     "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>>>>
>>>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>>>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>>>>
>>>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted
>>> to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post
>>> doesn't make any sense.
>> 
>> Make enough and the odds are one or more may be accidentally
>> right.  Of course making a prediction about when your grave
>> would be robbed is about as meaningless as they come.
>
>You don't know half the story.  He also said the guy could gain his 
>powers by drinking wine out of his skull, and that he would die that 
>very night, which he did by a stray bullet in the Italian war.

I know nothing of the details but I do not think any such
"prophecy" has any validity beyond coincidence.  Or the
ulterior motives of any "witnesses".

All hogwash.

>
>> I was accused of saying "Who wrote the prophecy?".  I did
>> not say that.
>> 
>
>Paraphrased...  Tell me what you said and let's compare.

Read it for yourself above.

-- 


Build a wall.
Deport them all.

Every illegal is a criminal.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

DEI DEATH CERTIFICATE

Date - Jan 20, 2025
Time - 12:00 Noon

"Joe who?"

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#942

From.../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com>
Date2025-03-27 08:28 -0500
Message-ID<m4l24gFccgeU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#941
Attila wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:46:26 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <m4jlf1F5i5jU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
> 
>> Attila wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:57:42 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
>>> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <m4g5k4F15jU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>>>>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>>>>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because your last question was
>>>>>>      "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>>>>>
>>>>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>>>>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted
>>>> to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post
>>>> doesn't make any sense.
>>>
>>> Make enough and the odds are one or more may be accidentally
>>> right.  Of course making a prediction about when your grave
>>> would be robbed is about as meaningless as they come.
>>
>> You don't know half the story.  He also said the guy could gain his
>> powers by drinking wine out of his skull, and that he would die that
>> very night, which he did by a stray bullet in the Italian war.
> 
> I know nothing of the details but I do not think any such
> "prophecy" has any validity beyond coincidence.  Or the
> ulterior motives of any "witnesses".
> 
> All hogwash.

Look, kid, if there was ever a contemporary Prophet, it was Nostradamus. 
  In another story he defied a nobleman who sought to discredit him.

Nobleman: "There is a white pig and a colored pig, which will we be 
eating tonight?"

Nostradamus: "The colored pig."

The nobleman orders that the white pig be slaughtered and served.

As they are eating, the nobleman asks the chef which pig was prepared.

Chef: "The colored pig.  We were preparing the white pig when it fell in 
the dust and dirt and was no longer fit to serve, and then the colored 
pig was called up."
>>
>>> I was accused of saying "Who wrote the prophecy?".  I did
>>> not say that.
>>>
>>
>> Paraphrased...  Tell me what you said and let's compare.
> 
> Read it for yourself above.
>No thanks, I'd rather not.
-- 
You're the future of fire
You're the witness of war
You're the irony of justice
And the father of law
Been waiting for awhile to meet you
For the chance to shake your hand
To give you thanks for all the sufferin' you command

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#945

FromAttila <prochoice@here.now>
Date2025-03-27 16:13 -0400
Message-ID<9tbbuj1vnif6qa2oc1rvec1jvrjesestcq@4ax.com>
In reply to#942
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:28:48 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
<jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<m4l24gFccgeU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:

>Attila wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:46:26 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
>> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <m4jlf1F5i5jU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Attila wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:57:42 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
>>>> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>> <m4g5k4F15jU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>>>>>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>>>>>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because your last question was
>>>>>>>      "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>>>>>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted
>>>>> to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post
>>>>> doesn't make any sense.
>>>>
>>>> Make enough and the odds are one or more may be accidentally
>>>> right.  Of course making a prediction about when your grave
>>>> would be robbed is about as meaningless as they come.
>>>
>>> You don't know half the story.  He also said the guy could gain his
>>> powers by drinking wine out of his skull, and that he would die that
>>> very night, which he did by a stray bullet in the Italian war.
>> 
>> I know nothing of the details but I do not think any such
>> "prophecy" has any validity beyond coincidence.  Or the
>> ulterior motives of any "witnesses".
>> 
>> All hogwash.
>
>Look, kid, if there was ever a contemporary Prophet, it was Nostradamus. 
>  In another story he defied a nobleman who sought to discredit him.

I am not a kid.

>
>Nobleman: "There is a white pig and a colored pig, which will we be 
>eating tonight?"
>
>Nostradamus: "The colored pig."
>
>The nobleman orders that the white pig be slaughtered and served.
>
>As they are eating, the nobleman asks the chef which pig was prepared.
>
>Chef: "The colored pig.  We were preparing the white pig when it fell in 
>the dust and dirt and was no longer fit to serve, and then the colored 
>pig was called up."

Story probably told after the event.  Anyone can be accurate
that way.

Prophecy is for circus sideshows.  

Isn't it strange how a prophet doesn't seem to be able to
hit all of the lotteries and become instantly rich?  Or buy
Nvidia or Palantir at IPO?


>>>
>>>> I was accused of saying "Who wrote the prophecy?".  I did
>>>> not say that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Paraphrased...  Tell me what you said and let's compare.
>> 
>> Read it for yourself above.
>>No thanks, I'd rather not.

Suit yourself.

-- 


Build a wall.
Deport them all.

Every illegal is a criminal.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like 
the truth.  They start with the biggest 
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

DEI DEATH CERTIFICATE

Date - Jan 20, 2025
Time - 12:00 Noon

"Joe who?"

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, 
display or support of religion or 
religious positions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#949

From.../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com>
Date2025-03-28 13:40 -0500
Message-ID<m4o8olFs0qcU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#945
Attila wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:28:48 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <m4l24gFccgeU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
> 
>> Attila wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:46:26 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
>>> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <m4jlf1F5i5jU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:57:42 -0500, .../v]andrak|?...
>>>>> <jfwaldby@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>> <m4g5k4F15jU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0500, Jackie Cage
>>>>>>> <lsdavatar@hallucinoenmail.com> in alt.atheism with
>>>>>>> message-id <m3sql4FtbdoU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:30:43 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>>> <m3rm4iFo53tU4@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:09:10 -0500, Xx/v]andrak|?xX
>>>>>>>>>>> <xmfuller@t.query.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>>>>> <m3o0rnF79emU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|?xX wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
>>>>>>>>>>>> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> By some other silly superstition?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why is it relevant to you who wrote the prophesy?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It isn't.  Why do you think it would be?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because your last question was
>>>>>>>>       "Who wrote the prophecy?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My question was "Why is it relevant to you who wrote the
>>>>>>> prophesy?"  Personally I could not care less who it was.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prophesies are WAG's.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd have to agree that Nostradamus had a wise ass grin when he predicted
>>>>>> to the day when his grave would be robbed.  The rest of your post
>>>>>> doesn't make any sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Make enough and the odds are one or more may be accidentally
>>>>> right.  Of course making a prediction about when your grave
>>>>> would be robbed is about as meaningless as they come.
>>>>
>>>> You don't know half the story.  He also said the guy could gain his
>>>> powers by drinking wine out of his skull, and that he would die that
>>>> very night, which he did by a stray bullet in the Italian war.
>>>
>>> I know nothing of the details but I do not think any such
>>> "prophecy" has any validity beyond coincidence.  Or the
>>> ulterior motives of any "witnesses".
>>>
>>> All hogwash.
>>
>> Look, kid, if there was ever a contemporary Prophet, it was Nostradamus.
>>   In another story he defied a nobleman who sought to discredit him.
> 
> I am not a kid.
> 
>>
>> Nobleman: "There is a white pig and a colored pig, which will we be
>> eating tonight?"
>>
>> Nostradamus: "The colored pig."
>>
>> The nobleman orders that the white pig be slaughtered and served.
>>
>> As they are eating, the nobleman asks the chef which pig was prepared.
>>
>> Chef: "The colored pig.  We were preparing the white pig when it fell in
>> the dust and dirt and was no longer fit to serve, and then the colored
>> pig was called up."
> 
> Story probably told after the event.  Anyone can be accurate
> that way.

No of course not.  TheQueen of France was there.


> Prophecy is for circus sideshows.

And magic acts on television.

> Isn't it strange how a prophet doesn't seem to be able to
> hit all of the lotteries and become instantly rich?  Or buy
> Nvidia or Palantir at IPO?
> 

ThT'S Because Nostradamus died in the 16th century.

>>>>
>>>>> I was accused of saying "Who wrote the prophecy?".  I did
>>>>> not say that.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paraphrased...  Tell me what you said and let's compare.
>>>
>>> Read it for yourself above.
>>> No thanks, I'd rather not.
> 
> Suit yourself.
> 
NahI might have done that to beginwith but I'm not going to unravel the 
label I applied to you.

-- 
I can't define love.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#927

FromGronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
Date2025-03-23 23:52 -0600
Message-ID<vrqruj$7j5i$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#903
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
> Gronk wrote:
>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/kansas-gov-not-doing-enough-to-stop-satanists-from-performing-black-mass-at-capitol-critics-say?topStoryPosition=undefined 
>>>>
>>>> Kansas Gov Not Doing Enough To Stop Satanists From Performing
>>>> ‘Black Mass’ At Capitol, Critics Say
>>>>
>>>> Michael Stewart says he’s ‘putting the call out to every satanist
>>>> within three hours of Kansas City … to march into the Capitol.’
>>>> . . .
>>>>
>>>>    Well ...... 1st-amendment is 1st-amendment - if they've
>>>>    let Xians do religious events there then they can't
>>>>    exclude 'Satanists'. Fair's fair.
>>>
>>> Not true.  Whatever you think it is, satanism is not a religious term.
>>
>> Why not? What is it defined in relation to?
> To some evil that is prophesied to overtake Humanity
> 

What is it defined in relation to?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | rec.music.industrial


csiph-web