Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.crafts.metalworking > #543360 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Smith <null@void.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-06-03 06:43 +0100 |
| Last post | 2026-06-03 18:46 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to rec.crafts.metalworking
Ali-MIG 5000-series Al-Mg - wire dias 1.2mm vs 1.6mm Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2026-06-03 06:43 +0100
Re: Ali-MIG 5000-series Al-Mg - wire dias 1.2mm vs 1.6mm Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2026-06-03 18:46 +0100
| From | Richard Smith <null@void.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-03 06:43 +0100 |
| Subject | Ali-MIG 5000-series Al-Mg - wire dias 1.2mm vs 1.6mm |
| Message-ID | <m1se74i3ge.fsf@void.com> |
I've gone for an Ali-MIG (Aluminum-GMAW) welding machine. Lincoln Foundation book says all 1/16" = 1.6mm (apart from bigger for bigger size). I have only used 1.2mm wire - 5356 - some 5183. At thicknesses of Ali plate of like 10mm and 12mm, reckon about 14m/min of 1.2mm wire. (/ 14e3 25.4) ;; 551.1811023622048 ;; inch So is 551ipm By area ratio - which is exact guidance for steel - would be for 1.6mm wire (/ (* 14 9) 16e0) ;; 7.875 ;; m/min (/ 7.875e3 25.4) ;; 310.03937007874015 ;; 310ipm AI searched for me - it says * 1.2mm more penetrative * 1.6mm is softer more spread-out arc With 1.2mm wire I wondered if fillet corner fusion was too much (!). On T-fillet 10mm thickness definitely and Al-Mg (5000-series), * edges plasma-cut * plate much abraded (it was a recovered floor checker-plate) * which I wire-brushed with a steel brush (no stainless wire brush) There was quite a swirl of solid detritus circulating around at the leading edge of the weld-pool, and I got a sense I was slowing-down the weld to let it float-out and ensure fusion. I tentatively thought * I run much quicker on clean plate * I suspect the very penetrative arc was melting-out contaminants in the contact between the terminating plate and the continuous plate in greater quantity? I can macro-etch marine-grade Ali, to inspect the outcome. I do want to avoid equipping up with MIG-torch / GMAW-gun which I don't use. Hence - anyone know the arguments on this and can advise? I did break a weld in the wrong place and it took seemingly too little effort. I suspect the slowed run-rate gives coarser structure which is less strong (?). I suspect I need to weld fast(er). I like the idea of uniform penetration across the weld legs, and running fast... Anyone tell me if I can weld Al-Si 4000-series with a standard "push" wire-feeder if the wire is 1.6m / 1/16" ? With slippery liner - PTFE or HDPE? (only met HDPE). I have never MIG'ed 4000-series before. Regards, Rich S
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Smith <null@void.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-03 18:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m11pen8ql4.fsf@void.com> |
| In reply to | #543360 |
Richard Smith <null@void.com> writes: > I've gone for an Ali-MIG (Aluminum-GMAW) welding machine. > > Lincoln Foundation book says all 1/16" = 1.6mm (apart from bigger for > bigger size). > I have only used 1.2mm wire - 5356 - some 5183. > > At thicknesses of Ali plate of like 10mm and 12mm, reckon about > 14m/min of 1.2mm wire. > (/ 14e3 25.4) ;; 551.1811023622048 ;; inch > So is 551ipm > > By area ratio - which is exact guidance for steel - would be for 1.6mm > wire > (/ (* 14 9) 16e0) ;; 7.875 ;; m/min > (/ 7.875e3 25.4) ;; 310.03937007874015 ;; 310ipm > > AI searched for me - it says > * 1.2mm more penetrative > * 1.6mm is softer more spread-out arc > > With 1.2mm wire I wondered if fillet corner fusion was too much (!). > On T-fillet 10mm thickness definitely and Al-Mg (5000-series), > * edges plasma-cut > * plate much abraded (it was a recovered floor checker-plate) > * which I wire-brushed with a steel brush (no stainless wire brush) > There was quite a swirl of solid detritus circulating around at the > leading edge of the weld-pool, and I got a sense I was slowing-down > the weld to let it float-out and ensure fusion. > > I tentatively thought > * I run much quicker on clean plate > * I suspect the very penetrative arc was melting-out contaminants in > the contact between the terminating plate and the continuous plate > in greater quantity? > > I can macro-etch marine-grade Ali, to inspect the outcome. > I do want to avoid equipping up with MIG-torch / GMAW-gun which I > don't use. > Hence - anyone know the arguments on this and can advise? > > I did break a weld in the wrong place and it took seemingly too little > effort. I suspect the slowed run-rate gives coarser structure which > is less strong (?). > I suspect I need to weld fast(er). > I like the idea of uniform penetration across the weld legs, and > running fast... > > Anyone tell me if I can weld Al-Si 4000-series with a standard "push" > wire-feeder if the wire is 1.6m / 1/16" ? > With slippery liner - PTFE or HDPE? (only met HDPE). > I have never MIG'ed 4000-series before. > > Regards, Rich S I've gone for 1.6mm / 1/16th-inch - for the * gun / torch size (300A) * liner (PTFE) * contactor-tip (for ali.) * feed-rolls - U-groove for ali.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | rec.crafts.metalworking
csiph-web