Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.tv > #1858425 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-09-29 19:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2026-10-08 20:32 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 51 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.tv
Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-09-30 10:14 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-09-30 18:37 +1000
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-01 20:07 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2026-10-02 20:01 -0300
Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-04 09:27 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence Bob <usenet@bananacorp.nl.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:51 +0000
Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-07 17:15 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:03 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 12:59 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 04:20 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 16:03 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:35 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 18:08 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 10:01 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-08 09:02 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 21:11 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-10-08 17:29 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 10:38 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:37 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 16:26 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:49 +1100
Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 17:17 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 19:02 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:12 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-09 09:27 +1300
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:16 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:29 +1100
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:22 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence squalk <sq@net.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:17 +0100
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:43 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:26 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-08 11:00 +1300
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:30 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:22 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-02 12:07 +0000
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:26 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-10-02 15:56 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:47 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:27 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:30 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-02 11:37 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-02 22:57 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:53 -0700
Re: Super Intelligence Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2026-10-07 02:55 -0400
Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:08 +0800
Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-07 23:04 +0200
Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:32 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-09 04:37 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <V9TxS.10403$mPXe.3748@fx06.ams4> |
| In reply to | #1859096 |
On 10/9/2026 1:38 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > occam wrote: >> >> On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: >>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: >>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: >>>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: >>>>> >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>> >>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I >>> go about that in the first place? >> >> Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning. > > Why don't you clean your gutters yourself?? You don't know how? Ask Ai, > she'll tell you how. > > > With the money you save you can use it to buy a ton of Fentanyl! Didn't Jack Reacher get into trouble over some fentanyl adventure or other in one of his books? I admit ignorance, because I never watched his movies, nor finished the T.V. show. I'm sure the A.I. can tell you exactly which book, but then you have to read it yourself if you want to have a manly male hero solve some crime or other, and enjoy the story. A /summary/ is not the story, and you won't enjoy it if you don't read it yourself. Which the A.I. cannot do for you [1]. Of course, if you only care about consuming the fentanyl yourself, then you probably haven't seen any of the Jack Reacher movies, nor the T.V. show, nor read any of his books. And what does that make you, who claim to be /super intelligent/? [1] I'm not counting text-to-speech here as an application of A.I. since you can just use C.M.U. Flite, http://cmuflite.org/ and please don't mind the lack of S.S.L., locally and don't need to pay an A.I. to do this for you. I mean, you /do/ pay for the ChatGPT tokens yourself, right? I hope the downloads still work, I didn't check. -- Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 16:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6AC8268E.2CEB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1859110 |
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > > On 10/9/2026 1:38 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > occam wrote: > >> > >> On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > >>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: > >>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: > >>>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> <snip> > >>>> > >>> > >>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I > >>> go about that in the first place? > >> > >> Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning. > > > > Why don't you clean your gutters yourself?? You don't know how? Ask Ai, > > she'll tell you how. > > > > > > With the money you save you can use it to buy a ton of Fentanyl! > > Didn't Jack Reacher get into trouble over some fentanyl adventure or > other in one of his books? I admit ignorance, because I never watched > his movies, nor finished the T.V. show. > > I'm sure the A.I. can tell you exactly which book, but then you have to > read it yourself if you want to have a manly male hero solve some crime > or other, and enjoy the story. A /summary/ is not the story, and you > won't enjoy it if you don't read it yourself. Which the A.I. cannot do > for you [1]. > > Of course, if you only care about consuming the fentanyl yourself, then > you probably haven't seen any of the Jack Reacher movies, nor the T.V. > show, nor read any of his books. And what does that make you, who claim > to be /super intelligent/? President Donald Trump signed an executive order on September 29, 2026, officially renaming "Artificial Intelligence" (AI) to "Super Intelligence" (SI) across all U.S. federal executive branch agencies. I never claimed to be super intelligent... I have (SI) "Super Intelligence" (SI) everybody else has Ai and I never read a Fiction book in my life! as a kid i would go to the library to read books. I would follow the Dewey Decimal System it had there. So, I would look at all the books between 001-999. There was a section in the back that had no Dewey Decimal System. It was called the Fiction section. It had no Dewey Decimal System numbers. It had no facts in it, or an Index, or anything resembling the Dewey Decimal System. Lot's of made up stuff. So, I didn't bother to this day with those type of books. That is where it belongs, in the back. I rather be a six year old learning how to dissemble a machine gun. i never understood why others read fiction books. maybe girls read it.. > > [1] I'm not counting text-to-speech here as an application of A.I. since > you can just use C.M.U. Flite, > > http://cmuflite.org/ > > and please don't mind the lack of S.S.L., locally and don't need to pay > an A.I. to do this for you. I mean, you /do/ pay for the ChatGPT tokens > yourself, right? > > I hope the downloads still work, I didn't check. > > -- > Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ > I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com > https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; > Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <XAXxS.16834$B9ef.12595@fx04.ams4> |
| In reply to | #1859114 |
On 10/9/2026 7:26 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Of course, if you only care about consuming the fentanyl yourself, then >> you probably haven't seen any of the Jack Reacher movies, nor the T.V. >> show, nor read any of his books. And what does that make you, who claim >> to be/super intelligent/? > > President Donald Trump signed an executive order on September 29, 2026, > officially renaming "Artificial Intelligence" (AI) to > > "Super Intelligence" (SI) across all U.S. federal executive branch > agencies. > > I never claimed to be super intelligent... How else are people supposed to read /Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?/? But also, you get no respect from me for pretending to know everything the A.I. does. If anything, you get negative respect for being an A.I. addict. > and I never read a Fiction book in my life! What a dull life. No wonder you appear to be hooked on fentanyl. Well, best wishes getting rid of your A.I. and fentanyl addiction, I guess. -- Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-09 10:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <11a9a5e$aia4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1859110 |
On 09/10/26 07:37, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > And what does that make you, who claim to be /super intelligent/? Trump started this super intelligent business. "Super intelligent" means "exactly as smart as Trump", i.e. as thick as two short planks. Which makes me wonder why you bother reply to the idiot. You're only bypassing our kill files. -- Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org Newcastle, NSW
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 17:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aw2dndnPo7w0r1X3nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #1859117 |
On 10/08/2026 04:49 PM, Peter Moylan wrote: > On 09/10/26 07:37, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > >> And what does that make you, who claim to be /super intelligent/? > > Trump started this super intelligent business. "Super intelligent" means > "exactly as smart as Trump", i.e. as thick as two short planks. Which > makes me wonder why you bother reply to the idiot. You're only bypassing > our kill files. > No, Trump, the festering idiot, didn't coin "superintelligence", where there's basically a book called "Superintelligence" with the likes of George Anas about "ethics of superintelligence" which I'm quite sure he never read. "Journal of Science Fiction and Philosophy" -- https://jsfphil.org/ https://omnia.sas.upenn.edu/story/science-fiction-and-philosophy Giant Haircut Trump, that criminal, the other day said that anybody who didn't change their vocabulary was, in all upper-case, "THE ENEMY". Bad idea. Terrorists, then traitors, then truants: looking more like train-wreck.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <HBXxS.10404$mPXe.500@fx06.ams4> |
| In reply to | #1859117 |
On 10/9/2026 7:49 AM, Peter Moylan wrote: > On 09/10/26 07:37, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > >> And what does that make you, who claim to be /super intelligent/? > > Trump started this super intelligent business. "Super intelligent" means > "exactly as smart as Trump", i.e. as thick as two short planks. Which > makes me wonder why you bother reply to the idiot. You're only bypassing > our kill files. > Sorry about that. I guess I was slightly bored. I'll try not to reply to /the idiot/ much more. -- Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 19:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <TJOcnSn_lrnT1lX3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #1859123 |
On 10/08/2026 06:39 PM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > On 10/9/2026 7:49 AM, Peter Moylan wrote: >> On 09/10/26 07:37, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: >> >>> And what does that make you, who claim to be /super intelligent/? >> >> Trump started this super intelligent business. "Super intelligent" means >> "exactly as smart as Trump", i.e. as thick as two short planks. Which >> makes me wonder why you bother reply to the idiot. You're only bypassing >> our kill files. >> > > Sorry about that. I guess I was slightly bored. I'll try not to reply > to /the idiot/ much more. Stuporintelligence
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 20:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6AC85B90.2396@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1859123 |
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > > On 10/9/2026 7:49 AM, Peter Moylan wrote: > > On 09/10/26 07:37, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > > > >> And what does that make you, who claim to be /super intelligent/? > > > > Trump started this super intelligent business. "Super intelligent" means > > "exactly as smart as Trump", i.e. as thick as two short planks. Which > > makes me wonder why you bother reply to the idiot. You're only bypassing > > our kill files. > > > > Sorry about that. I guess I was slightly bored. I'll try not to reply > to /the idiot/ much more. Sorry, I didn't know this was a moderated newsgroup. I only post to ummoderated newsgroups. Let me double check this newsgroup:alt.usage.english, strange...it appears to me to be a unmoderated newsgroup. Do you have one of those unauthorized moderatos here???? FUCK HIM!!!! Tell him I said "Go fuck your mother!" You know, I think I might have to take over this newsgroup:,alt.usage.english, IT'S MINE! I OWN IT!! If you post to: ,alt.usage.english, it's only because I ALLOW IT! From now on, everybody in ,alt.usage.english, is going to have to learn how to speak English! I will be checking everybodys speling...so watch out! > -- > Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ > I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com > https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; > Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-09 09:27 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <11a8ubg$6gqt$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1859047 |
On 2026-10-08 07:02:30 +0000, occam said: > On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: >> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: >>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: >>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: >>>> >>> >>> <snip> >>> >> >> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I >> go about that in the first place? > > Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning. Mine too. :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 20:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6AC85C88.44F2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1859109 |
Your Name wrote: > > On 2026-10-08 07:02:30 +0000, occam said: > > > On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > >> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: > >>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: > >>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: > >>>> > >>> > >>> <snip> > >>> > >> > >> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I > >> go about that in the first place? > > > > Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning. > > Mine too. :-) What's your name? Do you have a tattoo with your name on it? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-09 10:29 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <11a990o$a75h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1859047 |
On 08/10/26 18:02, occam wrote: > On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: >> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How >> do I go about that in the first place? > > Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning. Thanks for the reminder. Bush fire season is starting early this year, and promises to be worse than ever before. At least weather patterns leak only slowly across the equator. Canada and Europe have paid heavily for Trump's failure to slow down climate change. The main risk to us comes from El Niño and data centres. -- Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org Newcastle, NSW
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 20:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6AC85DFF.54A6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1859115 |
Peter Moylan wrote:
>
> On 08/10/26 18:02, occam wrote:
> > On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
>
> >> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How
> >> do I go about that in the first place?
> >
> > Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning.
>
> Thanks for the reminder. Bush fire season is starting early this year,
> and promises to be worse than ever before.
>
> At least weather patterns leak only slowly across the equator. Canada
> and Europe have paid heavily for Trump's failure to slow down climate
> change. The main risk to us comes from El Niño and data centres.
>
> --
> Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
> Newcastle, NSW
Oh, he'a also a weatherman here...it'11 be cold and
overcast, high today in the low
30's, dropping to the low 20's
tonight, but I'm predicting that
all that moisture coming up from
the Gulf is going to miss us and
dump some locally heavy snow,
possibly blizzard conditions with
travel advisories in the
Harrisburg area and maybe as far
east as Philadelphia.
I get it, Peter Moyan thinks he's GOD!
you think i can convince Peter to give me a brain???
i leave in El Lay, wats the chance of rain tonight?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | squalk <sq@net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 20:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <cSCdnZ8FoLfxcVr3nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #1859007 |
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: >> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: >>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: >>> >> >> <snip> >> >>> >>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it >>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good? >> >> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around. >> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/> >> >> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2. >> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work >> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial >> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex >> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological >> processes." >> >> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic >> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos; >> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc. >> >> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational. >> The reason why most journalist like to criticize AI is because they >> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only >> better, quicker and cheaper. > > So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I > go about that in the first place? ==================================== Use your head.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-09 04:43 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <cgTxS.11568$AQqd.7842@fx11.ams4> |
| In reply to | #1859103 |
On 10/9/2026 3:17 AM, squalk wrote: > Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: >> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: >>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: >>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: >>>> >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> >>>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you >>>> think it >>>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good? >>> >>> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around. >>> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/> >>> >>> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2. >>> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work >>> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial >>> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex >>> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological >>> processes." >>> >>> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic >>> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos; >>> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc. >>> >>> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational. >>> The reason why most journalist like to criticize AI is because they >>> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only >>> better, quicker and cheaper. >> >> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I >> go about that in the first place? > > ==================================== > > Use your head. As previously discussed here in alt.usage.english, the /head/ is a loo on a naval ship. And I lack one of those. You're free to use the head in your very own naval ship, of course; I presume you paid for it out of your own pocket, after all. Now, If you pay attention to the /context/, I was asking occam what hap- pens when a human needs to do something the A.I. cannot? Because if I read this correctly, occam is trying to claim that the A.I. can just do everything, given the right prompts. I disagree. And I disagree so vehemently, I bought myself a bookshelf of cryptographic books, and another of compiler literature. You can see the pictures on my BlueSky account, linked below. So, squalk, how much do you put your money where your mouth is, and can you show us pictures of the library you presumably have in your very own naval ship? In other words, how much do you use your own /head/? -- Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 20:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6AC85EF4.2627@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1859111 |
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > > On 10/9/2026 3:17 AM, squalk wrote: > > Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote: > >> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote: > >>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: > >>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: > >>>> > >>> > >>> <snip> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you > >>>> think it > >>>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good? > >>> > >>> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around. > >>> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/> > >>> > >>> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2. > >>> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work > >>> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial > >>> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex > >>> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological > >>> processes." > >>> > >>> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic > >>> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos; > >>> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc. > >>> > >>> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational. > >>> The reason why most journalist like to criticize AI is because they > >>> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only > >>> better, quicker and cheaper. > >> > >> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do? How do I > >> go about that in the first place? > > > > ==================================== > > > > Use your head. > > As previously discussed here in alt.usage.english, the /head/ is a loo > on a naval ship. And I lack one of those. You're free to use the head > in your very own naval ship, of course; I presume you paid for it out of > your own pocket, after all. > > Now, If you pay attention to the /context/, I was asking occam what hap- > pens when a human needs to do something the A.I. cannot? Because if I > read this correctly, occam is trying to claim that the A.I. can just do > everything, given the right prompts. > > I disagree. And I disagree so vehemently, I bought myself a bookshelf > of cryptographic books, and another of compiler literature. You can see > the pictures on my BlueSky account, linked below. > > So, squalk, how much do you put your money where your mouth is, and can > you show us pictures of the library you presumably have in your very own > naval ship? In other words, how much do you use your own /head/? You can always ask a girl to give you head. i rather have a girl give me head instead of using my own head. > -- > Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/ > I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com > https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:; > Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-08 11:00 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <11a6fdh$39e5f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1858998 |
On 2026-10-07 15:15:13 +0000, occam said: > On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote: >> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes: >> > > <snip> > >> >> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it >> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good? > > It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around. > <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/> > > If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2. > "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work > in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial > intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex > structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological > processes." > > The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic > coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos; > made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc. > > The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational. > The reason why most journalist like to criticize AI is because they > feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only > better, quicker and cheaper. ... and with far more errors, that actual people then have to fix. :-p
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-30 13:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6ABD7160.44BD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1858431 |
guido wugi wrote: > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker: > > Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me? > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human > irrationality? It's not Ai, it's Si. and the universe is irrationality. > > -- > guido wugi guena? leave the gun, take the cannoli. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 22:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6ABF3FA5.3EE6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1858431 |
Silvano wrote: > > guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben: > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker: > >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me? > > > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human > > irrationality? > > > > Artificial stupidity, IMHO. dat would be The Three Stooges show, or the Abbot and Costello show, or any tvee show with a laugh track. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 12:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <18dab503ca584d42$844$16561$4256dc03@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #1858615 |
On Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:22:45 -0700, The Starmaker wrote: > Silvano wrote: >> >> guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben: >> > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker: >> >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me? >> > >> > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human >> > irrationality? Have you considered 'negative' intelligence? >> > >> > >> Artificial stupidity, IMHO. > > dat would be The Three Stooges show, or the Abbot and Costello show, > or any tvee show with a laugh track.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-01 22:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6ABF4089.72DB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1858431 |
s|b wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:23:07 +0200, Silvano wrote: > > > guido wugi hat am 30.09.2026 um 10:14 geschrieben: > > > > > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker: > > >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me? > > > > > > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human > > > irrationality? > > > Artificial stupidity, IMHO. > > What about REAL stupidity? dat would be Kamala Harris Kaka Mala. > > -- > Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae. > - Julius Caesar -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.tv
csiph-web