Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #451060 > unrolled thread

Uh oh, has Alice met her match ?

Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written

Contents

  Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 15:40 -0500
    Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? "Michael F. Stemper" <michael.stemper@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 17:30 -0500
      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-09-10 22:44 +0000
        Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? "Michael F. Stemper" <michael.stemper@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 17:03 -0500
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-09-11 18:14 -0400
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-09-11 23:53 +0000
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-12 00:07 +0000
            Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2016-09-12 00:36 +0000
              Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-09-12 03:06 +0000
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-09-12 15:34 -0700
                  Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-09-13 04:17 +0000
      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 18:06 -0500
        Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2016-09-10 16:45 -0700
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-11 00:31 +0000
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 22:51 -0500
            Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-11 04:20 +0000
      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-09-10 19:23 -0400
      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-11 00:30 +0000
        Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 23:03 -0500
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-09-11 00:50 -0400
            Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-11 16:04 +0300
              Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2016-09-11 14:20 +0100
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-11 21:02 +0000
                  Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2016-09-11 22:42 +0100
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-09-12 00:40 -0400
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-09-12 22:01 -0600
              Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-11 21:01 +0000
            Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-09-12 22:00 -0600
              Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2016-09-13 05:20 +0000
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-13 15:28 +0300
                  Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 06:22 -0700
                    Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-09-13 13:29 +0000
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-13 13:04 +0000
                  Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-09-13 08:31 -0600
                    Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 08:42 -0700
                  Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2016-09-14 00:54 +0000
                    Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> - 2016-09-13 21:40 -0700
                      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2016-09-15 04:45 +0000
                        Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-15 12:52 +0000
                    Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-14 05:10 +0000
                      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-09-14 11:30 -0700
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 12:27 -0600
              Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? David Johnston <Davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-13 01:08 -0600
              Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-09-13 03:31 -0400
              Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-09-13 06:20 -0400
                Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? leif.roar@dimnakorr.com - 2016-09-13 15:42 -0500
    Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-11 00:26 +0000
      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 23:07 -0500
        Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 08:43 -0700
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-09-11 15:03 -0500
          Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-09-15 11:15 -0700
            Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 11:46 -0700
      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-09-11 06:34 -0700
      Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2016-09-11 06:56 -0700
        Re: Uh oh, has Alice met her match ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 14:08 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#451109

In article <mko9tb9rbfdjp6t02nr1eukd5r3d03avkj@reader80.eternal-
september.org>, lwe@sff.net says...
> 
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
> <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> >"Questionable Content" has private space stations, fully independent 
> >robots, robotic body parts, etc.  It is set 20 to 50 years in advance of 
> >our time.  It also has crazy teenagers and sex crazed robots.
> 
> I love Questionable Content.

Whereabouts would you say it gets good?

-- 
Juho Julkunen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451110

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:04:50 +0300, Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <mko9tb9rbfdjp6t02nr1eukd5r3d03avkj@reader80.eternal-
>september.org>, lwe@sff.net says...
>> 
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
>> <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >
>> >"Questionable Content" has private space stations, fully independent 
>> >robots, robotic body parts, etc.  It is set 20 to 50 years in advance of 
>> >our time.  It also has crazy teenagers and sex crazed robots.
>> 
>> I love Questionable Content.
>
>Whereabouts would you say it gets good?

The art is atrocious for the first year or two, but the writing is
pretty consistent. So if you've started it and it didn't grab you, don't
worry, move on.

I'd suggest Freefall.

	Cheers - Jaimie
-- 
Squawk! Pieces of Nine! Squawk! Pieces of Nine!
SYSTEM HALTED - PARROTTY ERROR.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451131

In article <rfmatbtgvvhlj8nmc17vc26eejluntf546@4ax.com>,
Jaimie Vandenbergh  <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:04:50 +0300, Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <mko9tb9rbfdjp6t02nr1eukd5r3d03avkj@reader80.eternal-
>>september.org>, lwe@sff.net says...
>>> 
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
>>> <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> >"Questionable Content" has private space stations, fully independent 
>>> >robots, robotic body parts, etc.  It is set 20 to 50 years in advance of 
>>> >our time.  It also has crazy teenagers and sex crazed robots.
>>> 
>>> I love Questionable Content.
>>
>>Whereabouts would you say it gets good?
>
>The art is atrocious for the first year or two, but the writing is
>pretty consistent. So if you've started it and it didn't grab you, don't
>worry, move on.
>
>I'd suggest Freefall.

Another good one.  My husband has started rereading it from the
beginning (possibly to refresh his memory of all the plot
points), when it was in black and white.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451136

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:02:42 GMT, djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
wrote:

>In article <rfmatbtgvvhlj8nmc17vc26eejluntf546@4ax.com>,
>Jaimie Vandenbergh  <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>
>>I'd suggest Freefall.
>
>Another good one.  My husband has started rereading it from the
>beginning (possibly to refresh his memory of all the plot
>points), when it was in black and white.

I did a full reread after Episode 1 completed just recently. I
discovered that during times I was checking it daily, I'd often now
forgotten what happened. Sections I batch-read, I mostly remembered. 

So I'll definitely stick to batch reading. Looks like I don't
consolidate the daily strips into Story unless there's a bunch of them.

	Cheers - Jaimie
-- 
Squawk! Pieces of Nine! Squawk! Pieces of Nine!
SYSTEM HALTED - PARROTTY ERROR.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451175

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:20:47 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
<jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:04:50 +0300, Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <mko9tb9rbfdjp6t02nr1eukd5r3d03avkj@reader80.eternal-
>>september.org>, lwe@sff.net says...
>>> 
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
>>> <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> >"Questionable Content" has private space stations, fully independent 
>>> >robots, robotic body parts, etc.  It is set 20 to 50 years in advance of 
>>> >our time.  It also has crazy teenagers and sex crazed robots.
>>> 
>>> I love Questionable Content.
>>
>>Whereabouts would you say it gets good?
>
>The art is atrocious for the first year or two, but the writing is
>pretty consistent. So if you've started it and it didn't grab you, don't
>worry, move on.

I'd agree with that.



-- 
My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451220

Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:04:50 +0300, Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <mko9tb9rbfdjp6t02nr1eukd5r3d03avkj@reader80.eternal-
>>september.org>, lwe@sff.net says...
>>> 
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
>>> <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> >"Questionable Content" has private space stations, fully independent 
>>> >robots, robotic body parts, etc.  It is set 20 to 50 years in advance of 
>>> >our time.  It also has crazy teenagers and sex crazed robots.
>>> 
>>> I love Questionable Content.
>>
>>Whereabouts would you say it gets good?
>
>The art is atrocious for the first year or two, but the writing is
>pretty consistent. So if you've started it and it didn't grab you, don't
>worry, move on.

I think he started to redraw some of the early ones.  I don't know if
he kept that up.
-- 
We are geeks.  Resistance is voltage over current.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451130

In article <MPG.323f82ead085e258989981@news.kolumbus.fi>,
Juho Julkunen  <giaotanj@hotmail.com> wrote:
>In article <mko9tb9rbfdjp6t02nr1eukd5r3d03avkj@reader80.eternal-
>september.org>, lwe@sff.net says...
>> 
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
>> <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >
>> >"Questionable Content" has private space stations, fully independent 
>> >robots, robotic body parts, etc.  It is set 20 to 50 years in advance of 
>> >our time.  It also has crazy teenagers and sex crazed robots.
>> 
>> I love Questionable Content.
>
>Whereabouts would you say it gets good?

Well, I've read it from start to current, and I think, if you
want to start reading when it gets science-fictional, you should
start with the entrance of Hannelore, whose father owns the space
station and built another character's mechanical hand (which,
note, are not in very common use yet).  But the semi-anthropoid
robots, I think, are there from the beginning.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451219

Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire

>>I check "Alice Grove" every day !
>>
>>Cue "Anticipation" !
>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NwP3wes4M8
>>
>>BTW, people may not know that this is the authors second strip.  He has 
>>been running a daily (Mon - Fri) SF strip for many years at:
>>    http://questionablecontent.net/
>>
>>"Questionable Content" has private space stations, fully independent 
>>robots, robotic body parts, etc.  It is set 20 to 50 years in advance of 
>>our time.  It also has crazy teenagers and sex crazed robots.
>
>I love Questionable Content.

I have QC, XKCD and SMBC on my RSS feed.  Explosm is there, but
frequently offends me to the point of almost dumping it.  Existential
comics is new on my list, and may get stale in a hurry.

I used to read GG, but the storyline moved too slowly for me.
Melonpool was there for a long time, till it got too tangled in its
time travel threads and went for a hiatus then reset.
-- 
We are geeks.  Resistance is voltage over current.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451224

In article <e3pc07F4kfdU1@mid.individual.net>,
Greg Goss  <gossg@gossg.org> wrote:
>Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> wrote:
>>I love Questionable Content.
>
>I have QC, XKCD and SMBC on my RSS feed.  Explosm is there, but
>frequently offends me to the point of almost dumping it.  Existential
>comics is new on my list, and may get stale in a hurry.
>
>I used to read GG, but the storyline moved too slowly for me.
>Melonpool was there for a long time, till it got too tangled in its
>time travel threads and went for a hiatus then reset.

Oh, are we doing webcomics again?

I also read QC and xkcd.  I'm still into Girl Genius.  Plus a bunch more:
Namesake (of which I've completely lost the thread of the plot, and need
to go do an archive binge re-read)
I was disappointed by Aaron Williams' willingness to lie down with puppies,
but his comics PS238 and Use Sword on Monster are still good.  (Strange
that they nominated his worst ongoing work -- of course, it all tied in
with trying to woo GamerGate.)
Something Positive
Erfworld
Darths and Droids
Oglaf
Sluggy Freelance
A Girl and Her Fed
Kevin and Kell (although I'm really not sure why)
Earthsong (almost over)
Goblins
Oglaf
Order of the Stick
Quantum Vibe (despite occasional disgust at its heavy-handedness)

-- 
   David Goldfarb          | "LUM-ber.  *heh!* *heh!*"
goldfarbdj@gmail.com       |
goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu  | -- Scott McCloud, "Some Words Albert Likes"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451238

In article <oDFG5F.17r3@kithrup.com>, goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu says...

> 
> Oh, are we doing webcomics again?
> 
> I also read 
> Oglaf
<...>
> Oglaf

Down, boy.

-- 
Juho Julkunen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451244

On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:28:01 AM UTC-4, Juho Julkunen wrote:
> In article <oDFG5F.17r3@kithrup.com>, goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu says...
> 
> > 
> > Oh, are we doing webcomics again?
> > 
> > I also read 
> > Oglaf
> <...>
> > Oglaf
> 
> Down, boy.

He *likes* Oglaf.

So do I; it can be screamingly funny. But be aware that it
is totally NSFW.

pt

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451245

In article <6d4b03e0-6024-4ad9-82fc-392aa37e3f30@googlegroups.com>,
Peter Trei  <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:28:01 AM UTC-4, Juho Julkunen wrote:
>> In article <oDFG5F.17r3@kithrup.com>, goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu says...
>> 
>> > 
>> > Oh, are we doing webcomics again?
>> > 
>> > I also read 
>> > Oglaf
>> <...>
>> > Oglaf
>> 
>> Down, boy.
>
>He *likes* Oglaf.
>
>So do I; it can be screamingly funny. But be aware that it
>is totally NSFW.
>
>pt

It still has some very good weeks, but has sort of lost its way after
the initial long "abused apprentice" arc..
-- 
------
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451241

In article <oDFG5F.17r3@kithrup.com>,
David Goldfarb <goldfarbdj@gmail.com> wrote:
>In article <e3pc07F4kfdU1@mid.individual.net>,
>Greg Goss  <gossg@gossg.org> wrote:
>>Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> wrote:
>>>I love Questionable Content.
>>
>>I have QC, XKCD and SMBC on my RSS feed.  Explosm is there, but
>>frequently offends me to the point of almost dumping it.  Existential
>>comics is new on my list, and may get stale in a hurry.
>>
>>I used to read GG, but the storyline moved too slowly for me.
>>Melonpool was there for a long time, till it got too tangled in its
>>time travel threads and went for a hiatus then reset.
>
>Oh, are we doing webcomics again?
>
>I also read QC and xkcd.  I'm still into Girl Genius.  Plus a bunch more:
>Namesake (of which I've completely lost the thread of the plot, and need
>to go do an archive binge re-read)
>I was disappointed by Aaron Williams' willingness to lie down with puppies,
>but his comics PS238 and Use Sword on Monster are still good.  (Strange
>that they nominated his worst ongoing work -- of course, it all tied in
>with trying to woo GamerGate.)
>Something Positive
>Erfworld
>Darths and Droids
>Oglaf
>Sluggy Freelance
>A Girl and Her Fed
>Kevin and Kell (although I'm really not sure why)
>Earthsong (almost over)
>Goblins
>Oglaf
>Order of the Stick
>Quantum Vibe (despite occasional disgust at its heavy-handedness)

Since we're doing lists:

Schlock Mercenary
Kevin and Kell
Girl Gendius
A Girl and Her Fed
Girls With Slingshots
QC
Alice Grove*
xkcd
Freefall
Something Positive
Breaking Cat News**
Seeking Shelter
9 Chickweed Lane
Luann
Luann Againn (same strip, in a different time period)
Zits
For Better or For Worse
Two Lumps
Scandinavia and the World
Doc Rat
_____
*Which I wish would update more often, but Jeph is only human.  I
think.
**Which is currently on hiatus while the artist and her family
move house again.

I read Quantum Vibe all through the first arc.  The current one
quickly turned me off; sullen teenagers do not attract me.  My
daughter (41 this November) has been binge-watching Buffy the
Vampire Slayer, which with its combination of teenagers and
horror turns me off even faster.

Next?



-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451248

djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:

>Since we're doing lists:
>
>9 Chickweed Lane
>Luann
>Luann Againn (same strip, in a different time period)
>Zits
>For Better or For Worse

I no longer read the "establishment" comics.  Yesterday, I picked up a
paper over lunch at the fast food place and never bothered to turn to
the comics page.  
-- 
We are geeks.  Resistance is voltage over current.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451249

On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 10:31:49 AM UTC-4, Greg Goss wrote:
> djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
> 
> >Since we're doing lists:
> >
> >9 Chickweed Lane
> >Luann
> >Luann Againn (same strip, in a different time period)
> >Zits
> >For Better or For Worse
> 
> I no longer read the "establishment" comics.  Yesterday, I picked up a
> paper over lunch at the fast food place and never bothered to turn to
> the comics page.  

I still mourn for the 70s and 80s undergrounds; Last Gasp, etal. 

pt

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451330

In article <oDG1nL.rv9@kithrup.com>,
Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
>Breaking Cat News**
>Scandinavia and the World

Oops, I forgot about these two when I was listing.

>I read Quantum Vibe all through the first arc.  The current one
>quickly turned me off; sullen teenagers do not attract me.  

That one has now ended, and a new one just begun.  It's featuring
Murphy and another fellow whom it seems like we're supposed to
recognize, although I don't.

-- 
   David Goldfarb          |"As an adolescent I aspired to lasting fame, I 
goldfarbdj@gmail.com       | craved factual certainty, and I thirsted for a
goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu  | meaningful vision of human life -- so I became
                           | a scientist.  This is like becoming an archbishop
                           | so you can meet girls."  -- M. Cartmill

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451356

In article <oDGyJ8.sow@kithrup.com>,
 goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) wrote:

> In article <oDG1nL.rv9@kithrup.com>,
> Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
> >Breaking Cat News**
> >Scandinavia and the World
> 
> Oops, I forgot about these two when I was listing.
> 
> >I read Quantum Vibe all through the first arc.  The current one
> >quickly turned me off; sullen teenagers do not attract me.  
> 
> That one has now ended, and a new one just begun.  It's featuring
> Murphy and another fellow whom it seems like we're supposed to
> recognize, although I don't.

Hugo? Here is his first appearance as Hugo in QV: 
<http://www.quantumvibe.com/strip?page=1086>. He is the download of the 
title character of QC: Volume 3.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451458

In article <robertaw-228E3E.21403713092016@news.individual.net>,
Robert Woodward  <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
>Hugo? Here is his first appearance as Hugo in QV: 
><http://www.quantumvibe.com/strip?page=1086>. He is the download of the 
>title character of QC: Volume 3.

Thanks.  I'd pretty much completely forgotten about that.

-- 
   David Goldfarb          |"I require three things in a man.  He must be
goldfarbdj@gmail.com       | handsome, ruthless, and stupid."
goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu  |                    -- Dorothy Parker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451468

In article <oDJ3vH.1q3r@kithrup.com>,
David Goldfarb <goldfarbdj@gmail.com> wrote:
>In article <robertaw-228E3E.21403713092016@news.individual.net>,
>Robert Woodward  <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
>>Hugo? Here is his first appearance as Hugo in QV: 
>><http://www.quantumvibe.com/strip?page=1086>. He is the download of the 
>>title character of QC: Volume 3.
>
>Thanks.  I'd pretty much completely forgotten about that.

Took me a moment to remember, too.  But after the first
half-dozen pages I didn't read the second story arc At All, and
it's been a while.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#451366

In article <oDGyJ8.sow@kithrup.com>,
David Goldfarb <goldfarbdj@gmail.com> wrote:
>In article <oDG1nL.rv9@kithrup.com>,
>Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
>>Breaking Cat News**
>>Scandinavia and the World
>
>Oops, I forgot about these two when I was listing.
>
>>I read Quantum Vibe all through the first arc.  The current one
>>quickly turned me off; sullen teenagers do not attract me.  
>
>That one has now ended, and a new one just begun.  It's featuring
>Murphy and another fellow whom it seems like we're supposed to
>recognize, although I don't.

O-o-o-o-kay, I'll tale a look.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written

csiph-web