Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #417248 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 214 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-03 15:51 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-03 20:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-04 19:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-11 14:10 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-07 19:52 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-07 20:17 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-06 06:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-07 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 13:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-07 20:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-08 08:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David Johnston <David@block.net> - 2015-08-08 09:30 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-08 09:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Anthony Frost <Vulch@vulch.org> - 2015-08-09 10:48 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 12:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-08 16:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-08 19:36 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-09 01:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-10 01:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. petertrei@gmail.com - 2015-08-10 07:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-09 07:56 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. petertrei@gmail.com - 2015-08-04 13:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-04 14:48 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. petertrei@gmail.com - 2015-08-04 13:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 14:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-04 15:35 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-04 15:39 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2015-07-31 21:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> - 2015-08-02 14:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kcfbsatfn54r0icl92bs23a0c8au0bokq3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419355 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >>>Attila < wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>> >>> etc. >>>> >> >>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>> > >>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>> > >>>> >>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>> connected to it? >>>> >>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>> >>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>> >>> >>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>extinct at this day.” >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >> >>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>ago to fit the necessary pattern. > >If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. > Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever changes it desired. It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. Making everything fit was an obvious goal. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419399 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>> >>> etc. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>> > >>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>> connected to it? >>>>> >>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>> >>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>> >>>> >>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>> >>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >> >>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >changes it desired. For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >Making everything fit was an obvious goal. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8i5esahgll1hjrsvlcc5ubbdc6t9jf0sus@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419439 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>> >>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>> >>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>> >>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. > >>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>changes it desired. > >For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports it's existence today. > >>It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >>Making everything fit was an obvious goal. > -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bvpesa9vkpdqnu3j4eumn8ps0tcvt7chne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419499 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>>> >>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>> >>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >> >>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>changes it desired. >> >>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. > >For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >it's existence today. Spiritual only. >>>It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >>>Making everything fit was an obvious goal. >> the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jargsalh8udf76kmua1sl1u1hpj4qvt591@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419510 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:47:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <bvpesa9vkpdqnu3j4eumn8ps0tcvt7chne@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>>>> >>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>> >>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>> >>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>changes it desired. >>> >>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >> >>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>it's existence today. > >Spiritual only. Everything. > >>>>It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >>>>Making everything fit was an obvious goal. >>> > -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419564 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:22:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:47:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><bvpesa9vkpdqnu3j4eumn8ps0tcvt7chne@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>> >>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>> >>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>changes it desired. >>>> >>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>> >>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>it's existence today. >> >>Spiritual only. > >Everything. Spiritual. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ckslsal6babqa2h16upb7a0jbpjumqpl6f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419698 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:55:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>> >>>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>changes it desired. >>>>> >>>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>> >>>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>it's existence today. >>> >>>Spiritual only. >> >>Everything. > >Spiritual. > Everything. The first thought control and the first political organization. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ca01sad15ldn9sbv9k9foe8b4geuuj9p3q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #418869 |
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:42:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <2rnvral9oac39a445m9eejbogajcqahl3q@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:04:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><vlbsrah3mesudq0pip7pc4l2jf178ekhav@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Your funeral. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You don't get a vote. >>>>>> >>>>>>I am the only one that does. >>>>> >>>>>You'll be dead - body wise. >>> >>>>Yep, so I really won't care will I? >>> >>>God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >>>soul. >> >>Prove a soul exists. > >Everybody has one. Avoidance noted. Again. > >>> You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. >>Prove that. > >Its what makes mankind to be mankind. Meaningless. What evidence supports it's existence. > > >>> Does/can/will >>>God reanimate your soul to experience final love or final fires. I can't answer >>>that. >>You seem to have an answer for everything else. Why not lie about >>that too? > >Never do I lie on the ng. You lie in every post. You constantly make assertions you cannot support. > >>>However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his >>>cross. >>Prove such a person ever existed, then prove that event occurred. > >Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >etc. Not an answer. Exactly what other sources support the events and people outlined in your bible that are not derived from that document. How many thousands of sources would you like to support the Revolutionary War? Direct, personal accounts actually written at the time by people who were actually involved and whose involvement was documented by other unrelated sources? In both the US and in England and France? That is one hell of a difference. The difference between fact and myth. But when have you ever cared about facts? > >>>I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the >>>way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come. > >>Prove anything was ever 'presented' to anyone, and I do not accept or >>agree with anything you say. > >That's to be discussed between you and God at the moment you die. > Or not. Your lack of proof is again noted. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9j62sap43a2r5b3j8qv8c979k1ai0ncpf2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #418972 |
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:16:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:42:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><2rnvral9oac39a445m9eejbogajcqahl3q@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:04:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><vlbsrah3mesudq0pip7pc4l2jf178ekhav@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Your funeral. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You don't get a vote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I am the only one that does. >>>>>> >>>>>>You'll be dead - body wise. >>>> >>>>>Yep, so I really won't care will I? >>>> >>>>God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >>>>soul. >>> >>>Prove a soul exists. >> >>Everybody has one. > >Avoidance noted. Again. > >> >>>> You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. >>>Prove that. >> >>Its what makes mankind to be mankind. > >Meaningless. What evidence supports it's existence. The same stuff I gave yo before. You refuse to accept it, and I can see it's totally over your head. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | petertrei@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 13:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <484ec2b8-910a-4c04-be56-de90e3a21a9d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #419050 |
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 4:03:30 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:16:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:42:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >alt.atheism with message-id > ><2rnvral9oac39a445m9eejbogajcqahl3q@4ax.com> wrote: > > > >>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:04:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > >>>On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>alt.atheism with message-id > >>><vlbsrah3mesudq0pip7pc4l2jf178ekhav@4ax.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>Still no evidence. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Your funeral. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>You don't get a vote. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>I am the only one that does. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>You'll be dead - body wise. > >>>> > >>>>>Yep, so I really won't care will I? > >>>> > >>>>God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a > >>>>soul. > >>> > >>>Prove a soul exists. > >> > >>Everybody has one. > > > >Avoidance noted. Again. > > > >> > >>>> You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. > >>>Prove that. > >> > >>Its what makes mankind to be mankind. > > > >Meaningless. What evidence supports it's existence. > > The same stuff I gave yo before. You refuse to accept it, and I can see it's > totally over your head. The arguments you are giving are convincing only to those who *already* believe. If your goal is to convert non-believers, you're doing it wrong, and should try other arguments. pt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 14:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d2cmorFgnn7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #419051 |
petertrei@gmail.com wrote: >> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:16:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >Meaningless. What evidence supports [its] existence[?] >> >> The same stuff I gave yo before. You refuse to accept it, and I can see it's >> totally over your head. > >The arguments you are giving are convincing only to those who *already* >believe. If your goal is to convert non-believers, you're doing it wrong, >and should try other arguments. I believe that the opening chapters of Luke (which leads into Acts) are phrased as a letter from a neutral party to a believer who wanted stuff investigated. If your material converts neutral people into believers, then any material created by a neutral party becomes insider documents. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | petertrei@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 13:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f01bc968-5124-41ce-8b7f-c6c9ff685909@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #419057 |
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 4:48:31 PM UTC-4, Greg Goss wrote: > petertrei@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:16:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > >> >Meaningless. What evidence supports [its] existence[?] > >> > >> The same stuff I gave yo before. You refuse to accept it, and I can see it's > >> totally over your head. > > > >The arguments you are giving are convincing only to those who *already* > >believe. If your goal is to convert non-believers, you're doing it wrong, > >and should try other arguments. > > I believe that the opening chapters of Luke (which leads into Acts) > are phrased as a letter from a neutral party to a believer who wanted > stuff investigated. > > If your material converts neutral people into believers, then any > material created by a neutral party becomes insider documents. Huh? pt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 14:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA4EC90F1AF756taustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #419062 |
petertrei@gmail.com wrote in
news:f01bc968-5124-41ce-8b7f-c6c9ff685909@googlegroups.com:
> On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 4:48:31 PM UTC-4, Greg Goss wrote:
>> petertrei@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:16:42 -0400, Attila
>> >> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Meaningless. What evidence supports [its] existence[?]
>> >>
>> >> The same stuff I gave yo before. You refuse to accept it,
>> >> and I can see it's totally over your head.
>> >
>> >The arguments you are giving are convincing only to those who
>> >*already* believe. If your goal is to convert non-believers,
>> >you're doing it wrong, and should try other arguments.
>>
>> I believe that the opening chapters of Luke (which leads into
>> Acts) are phrased as a letter from a neutral party to a
>> believer who wanted stuff investigated.
>>
>> If your material converts neutral people into believers, then
>> any material created by a neutral party becomes insider
>> documents.
>
> Huh?
>
I think Greggie's been hitting the vodka a little early today.
--
Terry Austin
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 15:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d2cph7FhfauU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #419065 |
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >petertrei@gmail.com wrote in >> On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 4:48:31 PM UTC-4, Greg Goss wrote: >>> I believe that the opening chapters of Luke (which leads into >>> Acts) are phrased as a letter from a neutral party to a >>> believer who wanted stuff investigated. >I think Greggie's been hitting the vodka a little early today. "Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught." "Theophilus" translates as "Lover of God" or in modern terms "believer". My brother, with a theology degree once told me that the "among us" is believe to have been added in later, and that the document was written TO a believer, but not necessarily BY a believer. Luke and Acts were originally one book, but split for convenience. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 15:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d2cpp0FhfauU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #419065 |
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >I think Greggie's been hitting the vodka a little early today. Today at noon was the "performance review" of last season's work at the tax office towards next year's assignment. I thought sincerely of hitting the ethanol afterwards - I hate performance reviews. But didn't. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <j8j3sad5doiidgk6vlapvkdqba6gfhod7j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419050 |
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:03:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <9j62sap43a2r5b3j8qv8c979k1ai0ncpf2@4ax.com> wrote: >On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:16:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:42:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><2rnvral9oac39a445m9eejbogajcqahl3q@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:04:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><vlbsrah3mesudq0pip7pc4l2jf178ekhav@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Your funeral. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You don't get a vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I am the only one that does. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You'll be dead - body wise. >>>>> >>>>>>Yep, so I really won't care will I? >>>>> >>>>>God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >>>>>soul. >>>> >>>>Prove a soul exists. >>> >>>Everybody has one. >> >>Avoidance noted. Again. >> >>> >>>>> You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. >>>>Prove that. >>> >>>Its what makes mankind to be mankind. >> >>Meaningless. What evidence supports it's existence. > >The same stuff I gave yo before. You refuse to accept it, and I can see it's >totally over your head. > You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble "everything', which is hardly a rational answer. But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long ago. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419130 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:46:45 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:03:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><9j62sap43a2r5b3j8qv8c979k1ai0ncpf2@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 05:16:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:42:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><2rnvral9oac39a445m9eejbogajcqahl3q@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:04:31 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><vlbsrah3mesudq0pip7pc4l2jf178ekhav@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Your funeral. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You don't get a vote. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I am the only one that does. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You'll be dead - body wise. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Yep, so I really won't care will I? >>>>>> >>>>>>God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >>>>>>soul. >>>>> >>>>>Prove a soul exists. >>>> >>>>Everybody has one. >>> >>>Avoidance noted. Again. >>> >>>> >>>>>> You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. >>>>>Prove that. >>>> >>>>Its what makes mankind to be mankind. >>> >>>Meaningless. What evidence supports it's existence. >> >>The same stuff I gave yo before. You refuse to accept it, and I can see it's >>totally over your head. >> > >You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >ago. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <au86salf6vuuirkccdn8hol5cj0lbi7pj9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419154 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: >>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. > >You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. > >>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>ago. Much like the one above. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419211 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. >> >>You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >> >>>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>>ago. > >Much like the one above. I win, you lose. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1jfbsa19so5rgdculkkc3p99cjam00fpj6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #419356 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>>>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. >>> >>>You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >>> >>>>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>>>ago. >> >>Much like the one above. > >I win, you lose. > Is a contest of come kind involved? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written
csiph-web