Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #503550 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-01 11:21 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-12-01 11:21 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written
estimate of the age of the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-12-01 11:21 -0800
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 11:21 -0800 |
| Subject | estimate of the age of the universe |
| Message-ID | <5C02DF4B.43F8@ix.netcom.com> |
I just realized that how 'they' measure the age of the universe is done incorrectly. 1) by looking for the oldest star I don't see how they can look for the oldest star since stars existed trillions of years before the big bang. 2) and back to the big bang measuring stars from a big bang is not how you measure the universe since stars existed Before the big bang. I mean like WOW, you people got everything wrong, haven't you?
Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written
csiph-web