Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #459066 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-06 08:42 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-12-12 00:15 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 68 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written
Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 08:42 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 15:24 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:30 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-12-06 17:27 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 20:55 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 17:54 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 08:59 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 15:40 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 15:59 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 16:05 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:10 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:22 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:54 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 14:27 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 12:39 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 22:58 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 00:02 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:15 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:24 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:36 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 13:40 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-11 21:33 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:05 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 11:02 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 11:10 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-12 15:13 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 13:22 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-12 17:00 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:34 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-12-13 03:41 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 09:32 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:26 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:30 -0800
The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:53 -0800
Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:59 -0800
Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 23:08 -0800
Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-15 20:39 -0800
Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 10:50 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:36 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-13 12:36 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 14:21 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-14 01:48 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 03:49 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 11:11 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Tom Kratman <tomkratman@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 06:17 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:37 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-15 21:33 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 21:50 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 08:52 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 09:07 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 11:51 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 12:43 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 13:43 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 14:04 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 14:31 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 14:31 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-12-14 00:46 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-14 04:16 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "Michael R N Dolbear" <me@privacy.net> - 2016-12-12 22:05 +0000
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 18:39 -0600
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2016-12-12 17:21 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:37 -0700
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-13 02:18 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Madawc Williams <madawcnow@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 03:53 -0800
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-12-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 20:22 -0500
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2016-12-11 17:17 +0000
Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:15 -0800
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 08:42 -0800 |
| Subject | Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? |
| Message-ID | <5846EA7C.7D57@ix.netcom.com> |
In this blueprint for making atomic bombs Albert Einstein wrote: http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs, and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power- ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air." --Albert Einstein In the last sentence Albert says: "However, such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by air." Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by air transportation? What size bomb was Albert Einstein thinking of? Or what weight did Albert Einstein did he had in mind or figured out? can be carried by boat but not by plane??? This guy sounds like he designs airplanes for Germans... Albert Einstein was wrong about that. That's a fact. The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 15:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459066 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > >In the last sentence Albert says: > > >"However, > > >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > >air." > > >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? > > >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by air transportation? > > That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he figured out a fission > explosion was possible but didn't know what it would take to trigger it (nobody > knew at the time). He was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes > of the time. After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of > the bombs. Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg Do you wanna see more?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 15:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6D69DCCB22DAtaustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #459088 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com:
> Michael Moroney wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>>
>> >In the last sentence Albert says:
>>
>> >"However,
>>
>> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for
>> >transportation by
>>
>> >air."
>>
>> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
>>
>> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by
>> >air transportation?
>>
>> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he
>> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know
>> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time). He
>> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the
>> time. After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual
>> design of the bombs.
>
>
> Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
>
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
>
>
> Do you wanna see more?
>
Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like
something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same
stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on
that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he
may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source,
given how mentally ill you seem to be).
But in the end, all that really matters is that you're a racist
loon who masturbates *way* too much. If you take a break, the
friction burns will heal, and you'll be a lot less cranky.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 17:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9c87e809-4619-41df-92d6-9335432020d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459090 |
On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 6:30:47 PM UTC-5, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com: > > > Michael Moroney wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > >> > >> >In the last sentence Albert says: > >> > >> >"However, > >> > >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for > >> >transportation by > >> > >> >air." > >> > >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? > >> > >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by > >> >air transportation? > >> > >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he > >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know > >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time). He > >> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the > >> time. After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual > >> design of the bombs. > > > > > > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > > > > > Do you wanna see more? > > > Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like > something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same > stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on > that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he > may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source, > given how mentally ill you seem to be). > > But in the end, all that really matters is that you're a racist > loon who masturbates *way* too much. If you take a break, the > friction burns will heal, and you'll be a lot less cranky. > > -- > I dunno that *macher actually masturbates. That's activity that can lead to a positive result, and he's never shown any sign of being capable of anything like that Kevin R
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 20:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.32b136017f1e5c6798a775@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #459093 |
In article <9c87e809-4619-41df-92d6-9335432020d4 @googlegroups.com>, kevrob@my-deja.com says... > > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 6:30:47 PM UTC-5, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > > news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com: > > > > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > >> > > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > >> > > >> >In the last sentence Albert says: > > >> > > >> >"However, > > >> > > >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for > > >> >transportation by > > >> > > >> >air." > > >> > > >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? > > >> > > >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by > > >> >air transportation? > > >> > > >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he > > >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know > > >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time). He > > >> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the > > >> time. After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual > > >> design of the bombs. > > > > > > > > > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > > > > > > > > Do you wanna see more? > > > > > Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like > > something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same > > stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on > > that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he > > may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source, > > given how mentally ill you seem to be). > > > > But in the end, all that really matters is that you're a racist > > loon who masturbates *way* too much. If you take a break, the > > friction burns will heal, and you'll be a lot less cranky. > > > > -- > > > > I dunno that *macher actually masturbates. That's activity that > can lead to a positive result, and he's never shown any sign > of being capable of anything like that > > Kevin R Not to mention that he'd have to be able to find his dick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 17:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <58476BD2.C7B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459090 |
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com: > > > Michael Moroney wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > >> > >> >In the last sentence Albert says: > >> > >> >"However, > >> > >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for > >> >transportation by > >> > >> >air." > >> > >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? > >> > >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by > >> >air transportation? > >> > >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he > >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know > >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time). He > >> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the > >> time. After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual > >> design of the bombs. > > > > > > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > > > > > Do you wanna see more? > > > Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like > something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same > stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on > that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he > may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source, > given how mentally ill you seem to be). The comment the original poster made is: "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs." It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb is he refering too? I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed. Do you wanna see more???? bombs?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 08:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6D75B626EF59taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #459098 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:58476BD2.C7B@ix.netcom.com:
> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com:
>>
>> > Michael Moroney wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> >In the last sentence Albert says:
>> >>
>> >> >"However,
>> >>
>> >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for
>> >> >transportation by
>> >>
>> >> >air."
>> >>
>> >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
>> >>
>> >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered
>> >> >by air transportation?
>> >>
>> >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he
>> >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know
>> >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time).
>> >> He was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes
>> >> of the time. After all, Einstein was never involved with
>> >> the actual design of the bombs.
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
>> >
>> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you wanna see more?
>> >
>> Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks
>> like something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking
>> the same stupid question one too many times, I don't see any
>> dimensions on that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long
>> after the comment he may or may not have actually made (you
>> aren't a credible source, given how mentally ill you seem to
>> be).
>
> The comment the original poster made is:
> "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design
> of the bombs."
>
> It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb
> is he refering too?
>
> I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed.
That isn't a design. That's a cartoon.
Much like yourself.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 15:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <58489DD2.6D60@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459140 |
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > news:58476BD2.C7B@ix.netcom.com: > > > Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > >> news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com: > >> > >> > Michael Moroney wrote: > >> >> > >> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > >> >> > >> >> >In the last sentence Albert says: > >> >> > >> >> >"However, > >> >> > >> >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for > >> >> >transportation by > >> >> > >> >> >air." > >> >> > >> >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? > >> >> > >> >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered > >> >> >by air transportation? > >> >> > >> >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he > >> >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know > >> >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time). > >> >> He was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes > >> >> of the time. After all, Einstein was never involved with > >> >> the actual design of the bombs. > >> > > >> > > >> > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > >> > > >> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > >> > > >> > > >> > Do you wanna see more? > >> > > >> Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks > >> like something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking > >> the same stupid question one too many times, I don't see any > >> dimensions on that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long > >> after the comment he may or may not have actually made (you > >> aren't a credible source, given how mentally ill you seem to > >> be). > > > > The comment the original poster made is: > > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design > > of the bombs." > > > > It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb > > is he refering too? > > > > I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed. > > That isn't a design. That's a cartoon. I mean, i don't get it...this is the way physics draw on the manhattan project. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Los_Alamos_Primer_assembly_methods.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project#/media/File:Los_Alamos_Primer_assembly_methods.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project they doodle they didn't go to art skool, they went to science skool. i just don't get it You think just because they got a high IQ, they can ...automatically know how to draw? Believe it or not...these people have to learn just like everybody else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 15:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6D7A2A0F782Btaustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #459187 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:58489DD2.6D60@ix.netcom.com:
> i just don't get it
>
We've noticed. On *so* many subjects.
A nice, scented lotion. It will really help the chafing.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hamish.laws@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 16:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0a01ec7e-fd76-4318-8ca1-13e4ca53ea7e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459190 |
On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 10:59:15 AM UTC+11, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > news:58489DD2.6D60@ix.netcom.com: > > > i just don't get it > > > We've noticed. On *so* many subjects. > > A nice, scented lotion. It will really help the chafing. > Deep Heat gets good reviews...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 10:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <584850B0.1728@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459098 |
edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 8:54:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > > > news:584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com: > > > > > > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > > >> > > > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > > >> > > > >> >In the last sentence Albert says: > > > >> > > > >> >"However, > > > >> > > > >> >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for > > > >> >transportation by > > > >> > > > >> >air." > > > >> > > > >> >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? > > > >> > > > >> >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by > > > >> >air transportation? > > > >> > > > >> That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he > > > >> figured out a fission explosion was possible but didn't know > > > >> what it would take to trigger it (nobody knew at the time). He > > > >> was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes of the > > > >> time. After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual > > > >> design of the bombs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you wanna see more? > > > > > > > Aside from the cartoonish nature of the drawing, that looks like > > > something a parent, exasperated by a stupid child asking the same > > > stupid question one too many times, I don't see any dimensions on > > > that. There's no evidence it wasn't drawn long after the comment he > > > may or may not have actually made (you aren't a credible source, > > > given how mentally ill you seem to be). > > > > The comment the original poster made is: > > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs." > > > > It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb is he refering too? > > > there were two dropped on Japan, and others tested before that. > he designed NONE of them. The original poster did not mentioned about "dropped", he simply said ...bombs, meaning more than one. "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs." Albert Einstein was the *architect* of the Manhattan Project and the atomic bomb...down to the last equation...e=mc2. HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS. > > > I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed. > > > > > > Do you wanna see more???? bombs? > > No. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg you welcome.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 10:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6D7699FBE725taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #459142 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:584850B0.1728@ix.netcom.com:
>
> HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS.
>
You masturbated while you typed that, didn't you? I know Jews make
you sexually aroused.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 10:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <58485AEC.30FA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459144 |
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in > news:584850B0.1728@ix.netcom.com: > > > > HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS. > > > You masturbated while you typed that, didn't you? I know Jews make > you sexually aroused. Well, the majority prostitues were Jewish girls during Capone days. According to police arrest statistics.. but Albert Einstein was brought up...Catholic. So, you've been subjected to a lot of...Fake News.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 14:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6D79327D81B4taustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #459152 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:58485AEC.30FA@ix.netcom.com:
> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> news:584850B0.1728@ix.netcom.com:
>> >
>> > HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS.
>> >
>> You masturbated while you typed that, didn't you? I know Jews make
>> you sexually aroused.
>
>
> Well, the majority prostitues were Jewish girls during Capone days.
> According to police arrest statistics..
>
>
>
> but Albert Einstein was brought up...Catholic.
>
>
>
> So, you've been subjected to a lot of...Fake News.
>
I suggest you get a high quality lotion with healing aloe, to reduce
teh friction burns. Or mastrubate less, but we both know that's not
going to happen.
And leave the cat alone. Pervert.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 12:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <58487396.5ED3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459142 |
edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:11:02 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 8:54:04 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > [] > > > > The comment the original poster made is: > > > > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs." > > > > > > > > It reads "bombs" meaning 'more than one bomb', ..so which bomb is he refering too? > > > > > > > there were two dropped on Japan, and others tested before that. > > > he designed NONE of them. > > > > > > The original poster did not mentioned about "dropped", > > he simply said ...bombs, meaning more than one. > > let's see what are you complaining about here? > 1 I merely pointed out there were multiple bombs, tested and deployed. > 2 I think the person you are trying to refer to was Michael. > 3 Well the original poster to this thread way YOU: > "On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 11:42:46 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > "> In this blueprint for making atomic bombs Albert Einstein wrote..." > > > > > > > Albert Einstein was the *architect* of the Manhattan Project > > and the atomic bomb...down to the last equation...e=mc2. > > A.E. was not allowed to work on the Manhattan project. > Learn some history. > > > > > > HE LOVED MAKING BOMBS. > > He made/built/designed/supervised no bombs (atomic or otherwise) > > > > > I simply posted one design of a bomb Albert Einstein designed. > > yeah. so what's your point? > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you wanna see more???? bombs? > > > > > > No. > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg > > > > > > you welcome. > > No thank you. > Boring, you get so repetitious. > ed It's not repetitious, it's bomb number 2 http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg the other one was bomb number one... http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg where is the repetition? Here is bomb number 3 http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb3.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 22:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5847B30B.2AAE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459088 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > >Do you wanna see more? > > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all > of three seconds to do. I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people criticizing his..art? It's not art, it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead. He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what difference does it make if it looks like a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 00:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5847C213.45BF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459121 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > > > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > > > >Do you wanna see more? > > > > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by > > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all > > of three seconds to do. > > I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people criticizing his..art? It's not art, > it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead. > > He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what difference does it make if it looks like > a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing. Here is a letter Einstein wrote with his same style designs http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315520 http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315523 it's just the way he draws... bombs. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 10:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <584851B9.7922@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459126 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > >The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> Michael Moroney wrote: > >> > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > >> > > >> > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > >> > > >> > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > >> > > >> > >Do you wanna see more? > >> > > >> > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by > >> > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all > >> > of three seconds to do. > > >> He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what difference does it make if it looks like > >> a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing. > > Now it's just an "idea for a bomb", not a "design". At least you're moving > in the right direction as you walk it back. > > >Here is a letter Einstein wrote with his same style designs > > >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315520 > > >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315523 > > >it's just the way he draws... > > More scribblings, nothing that could be considered any sort of "design". > Plus the date is 1913, before the discovery of fission and when we didn't > really understand the atom yet, also before GR. > > Remember, it took the best scientists in the US (except Einstein) four > years to design and build the Bomb, it's not something that can be > scribbled in three seconds that looks like it was done by some kid. I'm back to giving English lessons... to make a drawing, pattern, or sketch of https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/design
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 10:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6D769CFF4EB7taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #459143 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:584851B9.7922@ix.netcom.com:
> Michael Moroney wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>>
>> >The Starmaker wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Michael Moroney wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
>> >> >
>> >> > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
>> >> >
>> >> > >Do you wanna see more?
>> >> >
>> >> > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design
>> >> > of a bomb by Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a
>> >> > kid's drawing that took all of three seconds to do.
>>
>> >> He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, what
>> >> difference does it make if it looks like a 3 year old drew
>> >> it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing.
>>
>> Now it's just an "idea for a bomb", not a "design". At least
>> you're moving in the right direction as you walk it back.
>>
>> >Here is a letter Einstein wrote with his same style designs
>>
>> >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315520
>>
>> >http://www.e-manuscripta.ch/zut/content/pageview/315523
>>
>> >it's just the way he draws...
>>
>> More scribblings, nothing that could be considered any sort of
>> "design". Plus the date is 1913, before the discovery of
>> fission and when we didn't really understand the atom yet, also
>> before GR.
>>
>> Remember, it took the best scientists in the US (except
>> Einstein) four years to design and build the Bomb, it's not
>> something that can be scribbled in three seconds that looks
>> like it was done by some kid.
>
> I'm back to giving English lessons...
>
> to make a drawing, pattern, or sketch of
> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/design
>
mo·ron
/'môr?än/
noun
informal
noun: moron; plural noun: morons
a stupid person.
synonyms: fool, idiot, ass, blockhead, dunce, dolt, ignoramus,
imbecile, cretin, dullard, simpleton, clod;
See also: Starmaker
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 10:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5848569E.2355@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #459121 |
edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:57:51 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: > > > > > > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > > > > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > > > > > >Do you wanna see more? > > > > > > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by > > > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all > > > of three seconds to do. > > > > > > I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people > > criticizing his..art? It's not art, > > it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead. > > > > You were criticizing him for a mistaken estimate of the weight > of an atomic bomb. > > SM: "Albert Einstein was wrong about that. That's a fact." > > You posted the image presumably to show he was involved in the design. > > > He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, > > what difference does it make if it looks like > > a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing. > > No one criticized his drawing. We criticized your posting of it. > If your point was not a criticism of his estimation of the design > of the first atomic bombs, then what's your point? > > ed The original poster wrote: bombs, meaning more than one bombs "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of the bombs." I posted one design of bombs Albert Einstein was involved in... Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb???? The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent... the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG The rest below is for reference... http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/1-s2.0-S0172219005001742-gr1.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/AtomReactorCutawayLarge-aaa.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Lpage1.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Nuclear.jpg any questions?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written
csiph-web