Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #440729 > unrolled thread

Is Something Missing?

Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written

Contents

  Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 10:23 -0700
    Re: Is Something Missing? Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-27 18:29 +0100
    Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-27 18:08 +0000
      Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 12:06 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-27 21:27 +0000
          Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 15:50 -0700
            Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-28 00:26 +0000
              Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 17:39 -0700
                Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 18:08 -0700
                Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-28 01:05 +0000
    Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 12:16 -0700
      Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 22:13 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-28 13:25 -0700

#440729 — Is Something Missing?

I'm not good at math..

but when I see this:

E=Mc2


it always looks like something is missing.

What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?


What I mean is...

there's usually a bunch of numbers
on a blackboard...and it ends with the answer.


Shouldn't there be a bunch of numbers that
lead to E=Mc2? 

Where is it?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#440730

The Starmaker wrote:
> I'm not good at math..
>
> but when I see this:
>
> E=Mc2
>
>
> it always looks like something is missing.
>
> What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
>
>
> What I mean is...
>
> there's usually a bunch of numbers
> on a blackboard...and it ends with the answer.
>
>
> Shouldn't there be a bunch of numbers that
> lead to E=Mc2?

E=mc^2 is a consequence of the special theory of relativity.  See 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence#Background 
for example, or the numerous references and links therein.
>
> Where is it?
>


-- 
A high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers
least fitted to bring children into the world.... Some are of low
intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely
to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the
consistent combination of love and firmness.... They are producing
problem children.... The balance of our human stock, is threatened...
		Sir Keith Joseph

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440732

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I'm not good at math..

You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.

> but when I see this:
> 
> E=Mc2
> 
> 
> it always looks like something is missing.

Such as an education.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440734

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > I'm not good at math..
> 
> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.

wats a signle?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440745

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > I'm not good at math..
>> 
>> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> 
> wats a signle?

If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
doubt.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440751

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > I'm not good at math..
> >>
> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >
> > wats a signle?
> 
> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> doubt.
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


your spel checker couldn't figure it out...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440758

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > I'm not good at math..
>> >>
>> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>> >
>> > wats a signle?
>> 
>> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>> doubt.
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> your spel checker couldn't figure it out...

Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440760

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> > I'm not good at math..
> >> >>
> >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >> >
> >> > wats a signle?
> >>
> >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> >> doubt.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> >
> > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
> 
> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440761

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >
> > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > I'm not good at math..
> > >> >>
> > >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> > >> >
> > >> > wats a signle?
> > >>
> > >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> > >> doubt.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jim Pennino
> > >
> > >
> > > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
> >
> > Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
> >
> > --
> > Jim Pennino
> 
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?


I think I'm coming down with a cold...GO FIND A FUCKIN CURE FOR THE COMMON COLD! 


I think I'm going to have a headache...GO MAKE ME A FUKING ASPRIN, MOTHERFUCKER!!!!


I think I got cancer...GO FIND A FUCKING CURE!!



Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?


I don't like this planet anymore...GO ON A FUCKIN ROCKET AND FIND ME ANOTHER FUCKIN PLANET!!!


I DON'T CARE YOU GUYS BLOW UP LOOKING FOR ONE. TAKE THOSE STUPID TEACHERS WITH YOU ON A ROCKET...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440762

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > I'm not good at math..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>> >> >
>> >> > wats a signle?
>> >>
>> >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>> >> doubt.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jim Pennino
>> >
>> >
>> > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
>> 
>> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

Not hardly.

If you are looking for help, and you should be, search for someone with
the words "clinical psychology" in their title.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440735

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
> 
>    Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
>    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf



If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes
by L/c2.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf



So, L
stands for
radiation and radium?


and he changed the L to E, to read E=Mc2..


so it is a formula to make atomic bombs, right?


(if i read it correctly)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440779

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
> >
> >    Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
> >    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
> 
> If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes
> by L/c2.
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
> 
> So, L
> stands for
> radiation and radium?
> 
> and he changed the L to E, to read E=Mc2..
> 
> so it is a formula to make atomic bombs, right?
> 
> (if i read it correctly)

Now, I don't want to go off subject on bombs..

My question was "What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?"

Looking at the math in this file...it looks very familiar..
that math...I've seen it somewhere else...

Is that Isaics Newton's math????
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf


Did the math originated from...Newton?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#440824

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/28/16 12:13 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > My question was "What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?"
> 
>    Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
>    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
> 
>    More: Why Does E=mc2?: (And Why Should We Care?)
>    http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-mc2-Should-Care/dp/0306818760


wat is amazon?


Don't you know I have a Barnes and Noble gift card I still cannot use?

http://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/07/25/why-does-e-mc/why-does-e-mc.pdf



I guess Sam you don't know How To Do A Google Search.



You're still on what they used to call...the World Wide Web.


Throw away that book for dummies series...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written

csiph-web