Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #423976 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-02 01:17 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-10-08 20:31 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 100 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written
green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-02 01:17 -0700
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-02 14:40 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-02 22:18 +0000
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 16:02 -0700
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-03 02:29 +0000
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 22:29 -0700
Re: green stars Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2015-10-03 23:49 -0300
Re: green stars "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 08:48 +0100
Re: green stars Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 11:07 -0500
Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-04 12:50 -0400
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 10:54 -0700
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 13:21 -0400
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-04 11:15 -0600
Re: green stars Stumpy <perilmung@spamnet.con> - 2015-10-05 13:39 -0700
Re: green stars Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-10-08 20:27 -0700
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-09 00:08 -0600
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:54 -0400
Re: green stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 13:09 -0400
Re: green stars petertrei@gmail.com - 2015-10-09 10:16 -0700
Re: green stars scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 18:20 +0000
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 19:28 -0400
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-09 21:05 -0400
Re: green stars "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-10-09 21:42 -0400
Re: green stars "John F. Eldredge" <john@jfeldredge.com> - 2015-10-10 16:55 +0000
Re: green stars "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-10-04 09:27 -0400
Re: green stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 16:45 -0400
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-03 17:40 -0400
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:51 -0700
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-03 21:54 +0000
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-04 06:46 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-04 13:15 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-04 14:27 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-04 16:53 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-05 13:02 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-05 14:39 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-06 13:34 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 14:24 +0000
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-07 13:18 +0000
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-07 19:27 -0400
Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-07 19:43 -0400
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-08 01:58 -0600
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 01:11 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 13:49 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 21:20 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-09 22:04 -0700
Re: green stars Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-10-10 11:49 -0700
Re: green stars hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2015-12-05 02:32 -0800
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-08 08:19 -0400
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-09 00:10 -0600
Re: green stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 13:19 -0400
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-09 21:27 -0400
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-10 20:12 -0600
Re: green stars hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2015-12-05 02:22 -0800
Re: green stars Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 10:52 -0600
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-12-05 10:42 -0700
Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-12-05 13:02 -0500
Re: green stars Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-12-05 11:33 -0800
Re: green stars Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-12-05 15:00 -0800
Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-12-06 01:56 -0700
Re: green stars Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 19:08 -0500
Re: green stars Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2015-10-05 17:20 -0700
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 01:09 +0000
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 22:21 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 02:33 +0000
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 23:03 -0400
Re: green stars Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2015-10-05 22:03 -0700
Re: green stars Wayne Brown <fwbrown@bellsouth.net> - 2015-10-08 19:38 +0000
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-08 22:19 +0000
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 16:14 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 16:16 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 19:33 -0700
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:36 -0400
Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-09 04:19 +0000
Re: green stars Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-10-08 22:51 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-09 11:12 -0700
Re: green stars scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 14:05 +0000
Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 18:57 -0400
Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-06 13:34 +0000
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 10:57 -0700
Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-04 10:41 -0400
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-04 13:43 -0400
Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-02 22:38 -0400
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-03 17:37 -0400
Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:52 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:17 -0700
Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 14:04 -0400
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 12:58 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 23:52 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 10:24 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 12:35 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 15:15 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 15:31 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 23:12 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 23:34 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-07 00:49 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 21:24 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:39 -0700
Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:55 -0700
Re: green stars Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-10-08 20:31 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 10:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1juk6bxjiyi18.1tdgwein746qw$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #424121 |
On 4 Oct 2015 06:46:00 -0400, William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com> wrote in<news:mur018$5ei$1@panix3.panix.com> in rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics: > In article <nvnzI5.15Dv@kithrup.com>, > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) said: >> I managed to get an A in my one physics course (Physics >> 10, aka Bonehead Physics), but I do not understand >> anything past Newton. I haven't had to. I take it on >> faith. > Did you drop a '1' off the end of that, or was the course > really "Physics [ten]?" Why not? The first-year language courses at Pomona when I was a student there were, for instance, German 1a (first semester French) and German 1b (second semester French); these were followed by German 51a and 51b. The serious first-year physics course was Physics 51a and 51b (or 61a and 61b, if you were taking it with a more rigorous lab). Brian -- It was the neap tide, when the baga venture out of their holes to root for sandtatties. The waves whispered rhythmically over the packed sand: haggisss, haggisss, haggisss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 13:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <murog0$ii0$1@panix3.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #424136 |
In article <1juk6bxjiyi18.1tdgwein746qw$.dlg@40tude.net>, "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> said: > William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com> wrote >> djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) said: >> >>> I managed to get an A in my one physics course (Physics >>> 10, aka Bonehead Physics), but I do not understand >>> anything past Newton. I haven't had to. I take it on >>> faith. >> >> Did you drop a '1' off the end of that, or was the course >> really "Physics [ten]?" > > Why not? The first-year language courses at Pomona when I > was a student there were, for instance, German 1a (first > semester French) and German 1b (second semester French); > these were followed by German 51a and 51b. The serious > first-year physics course was Physics 51a and 51b (or 61a > and 61b, if you were taking it with a more rigorous lab). It's just that Foo 101 is such a common cliche -- and as a cliche is presumably based on widespread occurrence in real life -- that I thought a typo was a very real possibility. -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 22:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <munf37$hol$1@panix3.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #424027 |
In article <nvM5yI.1sLq@kithrup.com>, djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) said: > As a matter of fact, I believe green stars aren't > possible. In this universe anyway. I don't know. They can do some pretty amazing things with lime Jell-O these days. -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 17:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QYudnQDAGrU9143LnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #424027 |
On 02/10/2015 6:18 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote: > As a matter of fact, I believe green stars aren't possible. In > this universe anyway. Why not? As a matter of fact, our own star, The Sun, is primarily radiating in the green range. That's why plants on Earth are green, they are reflecting the strongest portion of the Sun's radiation, because it is too much energy for them to take in. The Sun looks yellow within the atmosphere because of atmospheric scattering of the sunlight. The Sun looks white in space, from outside the atmosphere, but that's primarily because it's so close to us, all colours look saturated in our vision. Yousuf Khan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA528975C4C77Etaustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #424090 |
Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:QYudnQDAGrU9143LnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com:
> On 02/10/2015 6:18 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>> As a matter of fact, I believe green stars aren't possible. In
>> this universe anyway.
>
> Why not? As a matter of fact, our own star, The Sun, is
> primarily radiating in the green range. That's why plants on
> Earth are green, they are reflecting the strongest portion of
> the Sun's radiation, because it is too much energy for them to
> take in.
>
> The Sun looks yellow within the atmosphere because of
> atmospheric scattering of the sunlight. The Sun looks white in
> space, from outside the atmosphere, but that's primarily because
> it's so close to us, all colours look saturated in our vision.
>
There is literally no single fact in your post that it correct.
--
Terry Austin
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 01:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <56123237.6ADB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424090 |
Yousuf Khan wrote: > > On 02/10/2015 6:18 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote: > > As a matter of fact, I believe green stars aren't possible. In > > this universe anyway. > > Why not? As a matter of fact, our own star, The Sun, is primarily > radiating in the green range. That's why plants on Earth are green, they > are reflecting the strongest portion of the Sun's radiation, because it > is too much energy for them to take in. > > The Sun looks yellow within the atmosphere because of atmospheric > scattering of the sunlight. The Sun looks white in space, from outside > the atmosphere, but that's primarily because it's so close to us, all > colours look saturated in our vision. > > Yousuf Khan so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 14:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jOCdnYUXCoskJo_LnZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #424189 |
On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around it, that are nearly as large as the peak. The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. Yousuf Khan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 12:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5612D679.77FF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424206 |
Yousuf Khan wrote: > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > Yousuf Khan My only explanation for the existences of stable green stars among fast moving red shifting stars shooting in all directions is the big bang occurred in a vicinity of preexisting stars. I'm going to have to re-write Science... and science fiction...and astronomy..and pyhsics! Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 23:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <56136F95.21CB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424209 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > Yousuf Khan > > My only explanation > for the existences > of stable green stars among > fast moving red > shifting stars > shooting in all > directions is > the big bang occurred > in a vicinity > of preexisting stars. > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > pyhsics! > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 10:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <561403D5.4FDA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424222 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. People wants answers, not....guesses.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 12:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614226E.1DB4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424230 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 10:24:44 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. > > > > > > That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. > > > > I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. > > > > People wants answers, not....guesses. > > No, it is not a theory, it is not a guess, it is a fact. > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > "Three processes help Earth keep its surface crater free. The first is called erosion. Earth has weather, water, and plants. These act together to break apart and wear down the ground. Eventually erosion can break a crater down to virtually nothing." > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > "... On the Earth, however, which has been even more heavily impacted than the Moon, craters are continually erased by erosion and redeposition as well as by volcanic resurfacing and tectonic activity." > > You 'explanations' are incomprehensible garbage... I like the cartoons: http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ Why is it these 'socalledfacts' never have an authors name???? For the same reason why doctors where masks.... No author names... http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm If you're going to post lies on a web page, you don't want your name associated with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 15:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <561447F7.5570@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424235 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 12:35:17 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 10:24:44 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. > > > > > > > > > > > > That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. > > > > > > > > I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. > > > > > > > > People wants answers, not....guesses. > > > > > > No, it is not a theory, it is not a guess, it is a fact. > > > > > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > > > > > "Three processes help Earth keep its surface crater free. The first is called erosion. Earth has weather, water, and plants. These act together to break apart and wear down the ground. Eventually erosion can break a crater down to virtually nothing." > > > > > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > > > > > "... On the Earth, however, which has been even more heavily impacted than the Moon, craters are continually erased by erosion and redeposition as well as by volcanic resurfacing and tectonic activity." > > > > > > You 'explanations' are incomprehensible garbage... > > > > > > > > I like the cartoons: > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > > > Why is it these 'socalledfacts' never have an authors name???? > > > > For the same reason why doctors where masks.... > > > > > > > > No author names... > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > I see your powers of observation are as poor as your science chops. You clearly didn't look very hard for the authors name, which is Calvin J. Hamilton, and the references he used are also there... > > "The information on this page was taken primarily from Koeberl and Sharpton. > > Koeberl, Christian and Virgil L. Sharpton. Terrestrial Impact Craters Slide Set. Lunar and Planetary Institute. > > Pilkington, M. and R. A. F. Grieve, "The Geophysical Signature of Terrestrial Impact Craters." Reviews of Geophysics, May 1992, vol. 30, pp. 161-181." > > > If you're going to post lies on a web page, you don't want your name associated with it. > > So, erosion is a lie? I don't know of any 'erosion' that exist that works on craters only. "However, we would like to caution against just using images or remote sensing to identify impact craters on Earth without corroborating petrographic and geochemical studies on crater rocks. Only such studies can provide confirming evidence that a geological structure is of impact origin." Translation: There is no confirming evidence a geological structure is of impact origin. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/craters/ "Introduction Impact cratering research has gained attention throughout the world following the suggestion..." "suggestion"???? Sounds like 'just a theory'. Now you guys are saying that it wasn't a asteroid that killed the dinosaurs but a vocano....and a asteroid (just to keep the asteroid boys happy). http://www.futurity.org/asteroids-volcanoes-dinosaurs-1018262/ http://news.sciencemag.org/climate/2015/10/volcanoes-and-asteroid-strike-may-have-done-dinosaurs I told you guys what killed all the dinosaurs already...they simply ran out of girl dinosaurs. There weren't that many chicks around...and they were ugly and smelly...stinky. Now today girls wear makeup and perfume. but they are still ugly and stinky....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 15:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <56144BB5.69E2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424240 |
i mean, come on already.... just because something on the surface of the earth 'looks like a impact crater' doesn't mean that is what it is. I got a potatoe chip that looks like it has impact craters on it... Did a asteroid impact my potatoe chip?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 23:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614B7CE.4888@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424241 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 3:31:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > i mean, come on already.... > > just because something > > on the surface of the earth > > 'looks like a impact crater' > > doesn't mean that is what > > it is. > > > > I got a > > potatoe chip > > that looks like > > it has impact craters > > on it... > > Did a asteroid impact > > my potatoe chip? > > True enough. However... > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_craters_on_Earth Okay, lets start with North America... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_craters_in_North_America Sure a lot of craters listed in Canada! I would think with all that terrible weather they have it would have...eroded all by now. Why did they all go to Canada???? So, let's look at the first one listed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_City_impact_crater it first reads: The Bow City Impact Crater is a probable meteorite impact crater ... "probable"???? watdoesdatmean??? soundslikesciencelingofor...idon'tknowidon'tknowidon'tknow. I click on Reference: http://www.wired.com/2012/12/buried-bow-city-impact-crater/ "An extraterrestrial impact crater is hiding near a Canadian ghost town....and is invisible unless you’ve got seismic superpowers." Does *anyone* need to bother going further? You would have to be a looney bird...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 23:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614BCE3.2BD6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424222 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > > > Yousuf Khan > > > > My only explanation > > for the existences > > of stable green stars among > > fast moving red > > shifting stars > > shooting in all > > directions is > > the big bang occurred > > in a vicinity > > of preexisting stars. > > > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > > pyhsics! > > > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. > > That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. > > In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. > > I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! > > If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy. did i spel astronomy wrong?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 00:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5614CE91.4A9F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424250 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > > > > > Yousuf Khan > > > > > > My only explanation > > > for the existences > > > of stable green stars among > > > fast moving red > > > shifting stars > > > shooting in all > > > directions is > > > the big bang occurred > > > in a vicinity > > > of preexisting stars. > > > > > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > > > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > > > pyhsics! > > > > > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. > > > > That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. > > > > In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. > > > > I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! > > > > If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy. > > did i spel astronomy wrong? maybe the green stars are at the antiuniverse...where all the antineutrinos hang out. I mean, you cannot have The Galaxy without an antiuniverse.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 21:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5617418E.6394@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424252 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 05/10/2015 4:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > so, are you saying the true colors of stars is ....Green? > > > > > > > > > > Not all of them, and in fact in the case of the Sun, the peak occurs > > > > > around the green, but there's still plenty of colours immediately around > > > > > it, that are nearly as large as the peak. > > > > > > > > > > The Sun's colour works out to a pink colour. > > > > > > > > > > Yousuf Khan > > > > > > > > My only explanation > > > > for the existences > > > > of stable green stars among > > > > fast moving red > > > > shifting stars > > > > shooting in all > > > > directions is > > > > the big bang occurred > > > > in a vicinity > > > > of preexisting stars. > > > > > > > > I'm going to have to re-write Science... > > > > and science fiction...and astronomy..and > > > > pyhsics! > > > > > > > > Throw your science books away, I'm re-writing your textbooks. > > > > > > That explains a lot if you look at it from a different point of view... > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > The Moon comes from an era 'before' the big bang, and got...banged up in the resulting explosion. > > > > > > In otherwords...you got all kinds of stuff in the universe that existed before the big bang. > > > > > > I wouldn't be surprised if Venus is older than our Sun! > > > > > > If you step back...you can probably see our universe is just in itself...a galaxy. The Galaxy. > > > > did i spel astronomy wrong? > > maybe the green stars are at the antiuniverse...where all the > antineutrinos hang out. > > I mean, you cannot have The Galaxy without an antiuniverse. I expect any day a phone call, and a man with a switish accent telling me "You won The Nobell Prize for Astro-Physics!!!" I solved the origin of the universe problem! wats next?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 01:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5612374A.44@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424090 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 10/3/15 4:37 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote: > > The Sun looks white in space, from outside the atmosphere, but that's > > primarily because it's so close to us, all colours look saturated in our > > vision. > > No--The Sun looks almost white to us because our eyes have evolved > with green, blue and red sensors. Even though there is a peak in the > yellow green range, there is still plenty of red and blue making > white. plenty of red and blue does not make white. The reason why they see red shifts is because red is the weakest color...it's the first to go.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 01:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <56123AF1.23A8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #424190 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > On 10/3/15 4:37 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > The Sun looks white in space, from outside the atmosphere, but that's > > > primarily because it's so close to us, all colours look saturated in our > > > vision. > > > > No--The Sun looks almost white to us because our eyes have evolved > > with green, blue and red sensors. Even though there is a peak in the > > yellow green range, there is still plenty of red and blue making > > white. > > plenty of red and blue does not make white. > > The reason why they see red shifts is because red is the weakest > color...it's the first to go. hottest stars are blue, while coldest stars are red. http://www.astrophysical.org/starclassification.php that would mean the green stars are ...just right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 20:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3fdf7fc9-d22a-4c40-a954-b58eafac8f08@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423976 |
Thank you for reminding me about the works of Lin Carter. (Specifically: Under the Green Star, When the Green Star Calls, By the Light of the Green Star, As the Green Star Rises, In the Green Star's Glow) John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written
csiph-web