Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #423001 > unrolled thread

Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

Started by	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post	2015-09-18 10:50 -0700
Last post	2015-09-23 12:06 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 150 — 26 participants

Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written

  Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 10:50 -0700
    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 14:53 -0400
      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:33 -0400
        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 20:03 +0000
          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:03 -0400
            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-18 17:13 -0700
              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:06 -0400
            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 23:04 -0400
              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 04:48 +0000
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:08 -0400
                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:22 -0700
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:43 -0700
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:54 -0700
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 15:51 -0700
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 14:03 -0700
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 14:45 -0700
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 22:16 -0700
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 09:35 -0700
                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 18:12 +0000
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 12:54 -0700
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:30 -0400
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:22 -0700
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 22:23 +0000
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 17:10 -0700
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:15 +0000
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-19 22:33 -0400
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 03:09 +0000
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:45 -0400
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0700
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:35 +0000
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 00:20 +0000
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:20 +0000
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:28 +0000
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:22 +0000
                                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 18:18 +0000
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-20 11:31 -0700
                                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 18:50 +0000
                                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 20:49 +0000
                                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-09-23 15:49 -0700
                                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 16:20 -0700
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 18:46 +0000
                                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 20:53 +0000
                                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0000
                                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:08 -0400
                                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:17 +0000
                                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:36 +0000
                                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:34 +0000
                                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 00:00 +0000
                                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 00:06 +0000
                                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 02:16 +0000
                                                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 02:42 +0000
                                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 04:57 +0000
                                                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 05:23 +0000
                                                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 06:13 +0000
                                                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 13:18 +0000
                                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-21 14:49 -0700
          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:24 -0400
          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 06:14 -0700
            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics puppetsock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 07:44 -0700
        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 00:46 -0700
          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0400
            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 11:57 -0700
              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:23 -0400
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 17:43 -0400
                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-19 18:00 -0400
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 18:59 -0400
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 15:11 -0400
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-20 15:24 -0400
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-20 18:40 -0400
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:18 -0400
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 15:54 -0400
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 17:17 -0400
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:05 -0400
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-09-20 20:30 -0600
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-21 14:33 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:43 -0400
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0700
                                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 18:48 -0400
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:41 -0700
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 16:03 -0400
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0400
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:51 -0400
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:29 -0400
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:17 -0700
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 23:19 -0700
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:57 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-20 12:03 -0700
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 13:51 -0700
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 00:01 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 00:06 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-20 08:24 -0700
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 08:29 -0700
                                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 12:04 -0400
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 16:00 -0400
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 07:42 -0400
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 15:57 -0400
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:48 -0400
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:27 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:33 -0700
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 17:27 -0700
                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 20:53 -0400
              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 17:25 -0400
              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-09-20 10:52 -0400
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 08:30 -0700
          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 09:33 -0700
            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 11:57 -0700
              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:07 -0700
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-19 16:13 -0400
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:21 -0400
                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:33 -0700
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0400
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 17:28 -0700
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:54 -0400
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 22:32 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-09-20 06:01 +0000
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 11:47 -0700
                                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 16:55 -0700
                                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:56 +0000
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:35 -0700
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics petertrei@gmail.com - 2015-09-20 14:10 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 03:31 -0400
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:09 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-20 11:57 -0700
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 13:54 -0700
                                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-21 14:55 -0700
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:05 -0700
                                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:53 -0400
                                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-22 10:30 -0700
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 19:07 -0700
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-09-23 14:55 -0700
                          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-09-23 14:58 -0700
                            Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-09-23 18:38 -0400
                              Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 16:18 -0700
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 20:34 -0700
                  Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-19 17:22 -0700
                    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 13:07 -0700
                      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 15:09 -0600
                        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 13:08 -0700
                Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-21 01:22 -0700
          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Shawn Wilson <ikonoqlast@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 10:26 -0700
          Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-19 17:51 -0400
      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 12:59 -0700
        Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-18 17:14 -0700
      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 23:03 -0700
    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics patmpowers@gmail.com - 2015-09-18 12:38 -0700
    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics patmpowers@gmail.com - 2015-09-19 20:40 -0700
    Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Persecute Global Warming Skeptics Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2015-09-22 19:48 -0400
      Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Persecute Global Warming Skeptics Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-09-23 12:06 -0700

Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →

#423001 — Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-09-18 10:50 -0700
Subject	Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
Message-ID	<55FC4ECF.5C5E@ix.netcom.com>

Kill those global warming deniers...

put them in concentration camps..

shoot them one by one.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/17/scientists-ask-obama-to-prosecute-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz3m6i5gZfj

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#423008

From	benj <nobody@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-18 14:53 -0400
Message-ID	<P4ZKx.3315$qY1.757@fx17.iad>
In reply to	#423001

On 09/18/2015 01:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Kill those global warming deniers...
>
> put them in concentration camps..
>
> shoot them one by one.
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/17/scientists-ask-obama-to-prosecute-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz3m6i5gZfj

You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as 
political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of 
which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored 
method is dropping deniers out Helicopters.

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423010

From	FPP <fredp151@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-18 15:33 -0400
Message-ID	<mthoq5$uus$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#423008

On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:

> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as 
> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of 
> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored 
> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters

You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as 
actually DOING it, right?
-- 
"Didn't believe we needed to "Make America Great Again" - until I saw 
the people we're seriously considering putting on the Presidential 
ballot." - Kelly Hines 2015

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423013

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-18 20:03 +0000
Message-ID	<197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#423010

In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> 
>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as 
>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of 
>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored 
>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> 
> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as 
> actually DOING it, right?

You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423038

From	"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-18 18:03 -0400
Message-ID	<MPG.3066542a999b50e1989b3e@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#423013

In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
says...
> 
> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> > 
> >> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as 
> >> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of 
> >> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored 
> >> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> > 
> > You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as 
> > actually DOING it, right?
> 
> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?

Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if 
the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global 
warming _advocates_.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423062

From	anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
Date	2015-09-18 17:13 -0700
Message-ID	<anim8rfsk-52D450.17131618092015@news.easynews.com>
In reply to	#423038

In article <MPG.3066542a999b50e1989b3e@news.eternal-september.org>,
 "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
> says...
> > 
> > In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> > > 
> > >> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as 
> > >> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of 
> > >> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored 
> > >> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> > > 
> > > You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as 
> > > actually DOING it, right?
> > 
> > You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
> 
> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if 
> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global 
> warming _advocates_.  

Would that be people that are advocating Global Warming?

-- 
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUZZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEQUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuu......

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423098

From	"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-19 04:06 -0400
Message-ID	<MPG.3066e17e3b4462f989b40@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#423062

In article <anim8rfsk-52D450.17131618092015@news.easynews.com>, 
anim8rfsk@cox.net says...
> 
> In article <MPG.3066542a999b50e1989b3e@news.eternal-september.org>,
>  "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
> > says...
> > > 
> > > In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> > > > 
> > > >> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as 
> > > >> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of 
> > > >> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored 
> > > >> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> > > > 
> > > > You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as 
> > > > actually DOING it, right?
> > > 
> > > You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
> > 
> > Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if 
> > the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global 
> > warming _advocates_.  
> 
> Would that be people that are advocating Global Warming?

What other kind of global warming advocates are there?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423066

From	benj <nobody@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-18 23:04 -0400
Message-ID	<hh4Lx.12862$C05.3843@fx16.iad>
In reply to	#423038

On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> says...
>>
>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
>>>
>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
>>>
>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
>>> actually DOING it, right?
>>
>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
>
> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
> warming _advocates_.

So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is 
allowed and which is censored...



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423080

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-19 04:48 +0000
Message-ID	<p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#423066

In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
>> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
>>>>
>>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
>>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
>>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
>>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
>>>>
>>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
>>>> actually DOING it, right?
>>>
>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
>>
>> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
>> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
>> warming _advocates_.
> 
> So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
> Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is 
> allowed and which is censored...
 
Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
to deprive constitutional rights.

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423099

From	"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date	2015-09-19 04:08 -0400
Message-ID	<MPG.3066e1f2fba541f4989b41@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#423080

In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
says...
> 
> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
> >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> >>>>
> >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
> >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
> >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
> >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> >>>>
> >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
> >>>> actually DOING it, right?
> >>>
> >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
> >>
> >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
> >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
> >> warming _advocates_.
> > 
> > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
> > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is 
> > allowed and which is censored...
>  
> Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
> act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
> to deprive constitutional rights.

In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach".  One of many.

Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying 
attention.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423151

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-09-19 13:22 -0700
Message-ID	<55FDC41A.3BE3@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#423099

J. Clarke wrote:
> 
> In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> says...
> >
> > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
> > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > >> says...
> > >>>
> > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
> > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
> > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
> > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
> > >>>> actually DOING it, right?
> > >>>
> > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
> > >>
> > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
> > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
> > >> warming _advocates_.
> > >
> > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
> > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is
> > > allowed and which is censored...
> >
> > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
> > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
> > to deprive constitutional rights.
> 
> In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach".  One of many.
> 
> Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying
> attention.



There is nothing wrong with a police state...
it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state.

You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States:
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml

He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans.

Instead, it killed Japanesse.

You don't want 'these people' to police your stste.


They belong in the basement killing little white mice...

'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423155

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-09-19 13:43 -0700
Message-ID	<55FDC8F8.1F0@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#423151

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> J. Clarke wrote:
> >
> > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > says...
> > >
> > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > >> says...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
> > > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
> > > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
> > > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
> > > >>>> actually DOING it, right?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
> > > >>
> > > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
> > > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
> > > >> warming _advocates_.
> > > >
> > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
> > > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is
> > > > allowed and which is censored...
> > >
> > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
> > > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
> > > to deprive constitutional rights.
> >
> > In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach".  One of many.
> >
> > Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying
> > attention.
> 
> There is nothing wrong with a police state...
> it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state.
> 
> You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States:
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml
> 
> He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans.
> 
> Instead, it killed Japanesse.
> 
> You don't want 'these people' to police your stste.
> 
> They belong in the basement killing little white mice...
> 
> 'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'!


Then, once they controll the government, they will control your
children..
they will decide what they learn and what schools they should go
to...also
you will not be allowed to talk to your children without...their
authorization.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423157

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-09-19 13:54 -0700
Message-ID	<55FDCB8D.723B@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#423155

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > J. Clarke wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > says...
> > > >
> > > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > > >> says...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
> > > > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
> > > > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
> > > > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
> > > > >>>> actually DOING it, right?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
> > > > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
> > > > >> warming _advocates_.
> > > > >
> > > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
> > > > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is
> > > > > allowed and which is censored...
> > > >
> > > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
> > > > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
> > > > to deprive constitutional rights.
> > >
> > > In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach".  One of many.
> > >
> > > Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying
> > > attention.
> >
> > There is nothing wrong with a police state...
> > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state.
> >
> > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States:
> > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml
> >
> > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans.
> >
> > Instead, it killed Japanesse.
> >
> > You don't want 'these people' to police your stste.
> >
> > They belong in the basement killing little white mice...
> >
> > 'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'!
> 
> Then, once they controll the government, they will control your
> children..
> they will decide what they learn and what schools they should go
> to...also
> you will not be allowed to talk to your children without...their
> authorization.



I've heard 'these scientist' have no soul...

I've heard they are cold and unfeeling.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423164

From	anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
Date	2015-09-19 15:51 -0700
Message-ID	<anim8rfsk-C495C7.15514519092015@news.easynews.com>
In reply to	#423151

In article <55FDC41A.3BE3@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> J. Clarke wrote:
> > 
> > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > says...
> > >
> > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, 
> > > >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > >> says...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well 
> > > >>>>> as
> > > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, 
> > > >>>>> of
> > > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
> > > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
> > > >>>> actually DOING it, right?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, 
> > > >>> right?
> > > >>
> > > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
> > > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
> > > >> warming _advocates_.
> > > >
> > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
> > > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is
> > > > allowed and which is censored...
> > >
> > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
> > > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
> > > to deprive constitutional rights.
> > 
> > In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach".  One of many.
> > 
> > Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying
> > attention.
> 
> 
> 
> There is nothing wrong with a police state...
> it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state.
> 
> You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States:
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml
> 
> He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an 
> atomic bomb to kill Germans.
> 
> Instead, it killed Japanesse.
> 
> You don't want 'these people' to police your stste.
> 
> 
> They belong in the basement killing little white mice...
> 
> 'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'!

Are you a troll stating the opposite of reason for comedic effect, or 
mentally ill?

-- 
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUZZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEQUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuu......

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423332

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-09-21 14:03 -0700
Message-ID	<5600709F.546A@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#423151

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 19.09.2015 22:22, schrieb The Starmaker:
> 
> >> In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach".  One of many.
> >>
> >> Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying
> >> attention.
> >
> >
> >
> > There is nothing wrong with a police state...
> > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state.
> >
> > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States:
> > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml
> >
> > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans.
> >
> > Instead, it killed Japanesse.
> >
> 
> Did you know, that Einstein was director of the 'Kaiser-Wilhelm
> Institut' in Berlin?
> 
> There he worked together with Leo Szilard:
> 
> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le%C3%B3_Szil%C3%A1rd
> 
> Einstein and Szilar patented a device, that was allegedly a
> refrigerator. Only: people trying to replicate the device found, it
> didn't work.
> 
> But Einstein got a lot of money for this patent. The patent was (and
> still is) used as component of a fast breading reactor.
> 
> This is a little detail, that made me wonder, what actually those
> physicists have done in Germany of the 20th.
> 
> There is an ever weirder project, carried out by the
> Kaiser-Wilhelm-Insitut: 'Project Chronos', what was allegedly a 'time
> machine' (allegedly working and still in operation).
> 
> Even stranger were 'Ufos' (Vril, Haunebu) what (allegedly) have been
> built in the twenties (together with space-flight).
> 
> So I tend to have some degree of distrust in those stories we had been
> told (e.g. about the atom bomb).
> 
> TH



There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others...

http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/




It has to do with that...patent.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423339

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-09-21 14:45 -0700
Message-ID	<56007A73.6072@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#423332

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> >
> > Am 19.09.2015 22:22, schrieb The Starmaker:
> >
> > >> In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach".  One of many.
> > >>
> > >> Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying
> > >> attention.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There is nothing wrong with a police state...
> > > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state.
> > >
> > > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States:
> > > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml
> > >
> > > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans.
> > >
> > > Instead, it killed Japanesse.
> > >
> >
> > Did you know, that Einstein was director of the 'Kaiser-Wilhelm
> > Institut' in Berlin?
> >
> > There he worked together with Leo Szilard:
> >
> > https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le%C3%B3_Szil%C3%A1rd
> >
> > Einstein and Szilar patented a device, that was allegedly a
> > refrigerator. Only: people trying to replicate the device found, it
> > didn't work.
> >
> > But Einstein got a lot of money for this patent. The patent was (and
> > still is) used as component of a fast breading reactor.
> >
> > This is a little detail, that made me wonder, what actually those
> > physicists have done in Germany of the 20th.
> >
> > There is an ever weirder project, carried out by the
> > Kaiser-Wilhelm-Insitut: 'Project Chronos', what was allegedly a 'time
> > machine' (allegedly working and still in operation).
> >
> > Even stranger were 'Ufos' (Vril, Haunebu) what (allegedly) have been
> > built in the twenties (together with space-flight).
> >
> > So I tend to have some degree of distrust in those stories we had been
> > told (e.g. about the atom bomb).
> >
> > TH
> 
> There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others...
> 
> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/
> 
> It has to do with that...patent.



I'll even add, why is Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others...

http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/

It has to do with that...patent.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423358

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-09-21 22:16 -0700
Message-ID	<5600E414.6E10@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#423339

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 21.09.2015 23:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> 
> >> There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others...
> >>
> >> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/
> >>
> >> It has to do with that...patent.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'll even add, why is Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others...
> >
> > http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/
> >
> > It has to do with that...patent.
> 
> The patent was actually used in breeding reactors. But it is quite
> strange to assume, that Einstein and Szillard have thought about
> problems in such reactors, long before they existed.
> 
> Or: actually, they had existed and they had been hidden somewhere
> remote. So an insuspicious use of the device was written into the patent
> (??)

I see you haven't read:
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html


All you need to do is read the letter carefully and all your questions
will be answered:

http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first




"In the course of the last four months it has been made probable -

through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in

America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction

in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large
quant-

ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears

almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future."


"b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car-

ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by

providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y

private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause,

and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial
laboratories

which have the necessary equipment."



They simply need more "uranium"....tons of it.









> 
> But if there are hidden labs and a hidden kind of physics, 'they' need
> from time to time some sort of 'leaks', to publish their results. This
> is necessary to keep the 'commons' in movement and let them 'develop',
> what is already known.
> 
> This is also useful, to blame somebody, if the results are not  -well-
> beneficial and people could eventually ask, whos to blame.
> 
> Spectacular events also need a plausible history and therefore some kind
> of project, where all the famous commons are herded together.
> 
> TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423127

From	BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Date	2015-09-19 09:35 -0700
Message-ID	<atropos-4361F0.09354119092015@news.giganews.com>
In reply to	#423080

In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
wrote:

> Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
> act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
> to deprive constitutional rights.

By doing nothing more than saying stuff that's unpopular.

The Court would have to overturn almost 200+ years of 1st Amendment 
jurisprudence to uphold the notion that the state can validly hold 
people criminally liable for deprivation of civil rights merely for 
saying "bad" stuff.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423138

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-09-19 18:12 +0000
Message-ID	<t4l0dc-5jh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#423127

In sci.physics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
> wrote:
> 
>> Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
>> act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
>> to deprive constitutional rights.
> 
> By doing nothing more than saying stuff that's unpopular.
> 
> The Court would have to overturn almost 200+ years of 1st Amendment 
> jurisprudence to uphold the notion that the state can validly hold 
> people criminally liable for deprivation of civil rights merely for 
> saying "bad" stuff.

That would highly depend on exactly who said what and to whom.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423146

From	BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Date	2015-09-19 12:54 -0700
Message-ID	<atropos-7D05F5.12541719092015@news.giganews.com>
In reply to	#423138

In article <t4l0dc-5jh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
wrote:

> In sci.physics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO
> >> act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy
> >> to deprive constitutional rights.
> > 
> > By doing nothing more than saying stuff that's unpopular.
> > 
> > The Court would have to overturn almost 200+ years of 1st Amendment 
> > jurisprudence to uphold the notion that the state can validly hold 
> > people criminally liable for deprivation of civil rights merely for 
> > saying "bad" stuff.
> 
> That would highly depend on exactly who said what and to whom.

No, it really wouldn't.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →

csiph-web

Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

Contents

#423001 — Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

#423008

#423010

#423013

#423038

#423062

#423098

#423066

#423080

#423099

#423151

#423155

#423157

#423164

#423332

#423339

#423358

#423127

#423138

#423146