Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #494323 > unrolled thread

Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex

Started bya425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com>
First post2018-06-29 09:34 -0700
Last post2018-07-09 03:31 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 147 — 36 participants

Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written


Contents

  Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-29 09:34 -0700
    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2018-06-29 15:28 -0700
      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 19:43 -0500
        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2018-07-02 21:30 -0700
      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-03 06:04 -0700
        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-03 08:13 -0700
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-03 08:55 -0700
            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2018-07-03 17:28 +0000
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-04 14:22 +0300
            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-07 22:17 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-07 23:25 -0600
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 01:26 -0400
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2018-07-08 01:12 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 02:41 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-08 15:24 +0300
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-08 06:42 -0700
                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-08 13:44 -0700
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Lawrence Watt-Evans <misenchantedpress@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 11:14 -0400
                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-08 10:14 -0700
                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-08 23:40 +0300
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2018-07-08 12:04 -0700
                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-08 19:20 +0000
                    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-08 13:41 -0700
                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-08 23:47 +0300
                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-08 20:56 +0000
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-08 14:03 -0700
                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex news{@bestley.co.uk (Mark Bestley) - 2018-07-08 23:03 +0100
                              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-08 15:41 -0700
                    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2018-07-08 15:06 -0700
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-03 09:07 -0700
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-03 11:52 -0600
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-03 20:17 +0000
            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2018-07-03 20:34 +0000
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-03 22:44 +0000
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2018-07-04 00:00 +0000
                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-07-07 22:32 -0700
                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex "Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.com> - 2018-07-09 12:33 -0500
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2018-07-11 19:14 -0700
            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-11 19:37 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-12 02:53 +0000
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-11 20:24 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2018-07-12 11:13 -0500
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2018-07-12 11:09 -0500
            Walk dog memory gloat D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-13 23:25 +0000
        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2018-07-06 00:07 -0700
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-06 07:57 -0700
        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Jesper Lauridsen <rorschak@sorrystofanet.dk> - 2018-07-29 21:14 +0000
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 06:11 -0700
            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> - 2018-07-30 10:02 -0700
            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Jesper Lauridsen <rorschak@sorrystofanet.dk> - 2018-08-12 20:08 +0000
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Dan Swartzendruber <dan888@druber.com> - 2018-08-12 22:59 -0400
    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Chris Zakes <dontivar@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 16:13 -0500
      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 18:30 -0400
        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Chris Zakes <dontivar@gmail.com> - 2018-07-11 14:23 -0500
      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Steve Dodds <sdodds@nova-optical.com> - 2018-07-04 16:55 -0600
        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 20:01 -0400
        YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-05 15:50 +0000
          Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> - 2018-07-06 16:59 +1000
            Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-06 17:01 +0000
          Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-06 09:57 -0600
            Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-06 17:02 +0000
              Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-07 09:37 -0600
                Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-07 18:22 +0000
                Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-08 03:25 +0000
                  Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-07 23:43 -0600
              Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2018-07-12 11:18 -0500
                Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Magewolf <Magewolf@nc.rr.com> - 2018-07-12 13:32 -0400
                  Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-13 08:27 -0700
                    Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Magewolf <Magewolf@nc.rr.com> - 2018-07-13 16:16 -0400
                      Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-13 13:41 -0700
          Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex 103134.3516@compuserve.com - 2018-07-06 09:38 -0700
            Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-06 17:29 +0000
              Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-06 17:41 +0000
                Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-08 10:33 -0700
                  Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-08 18:39 +0000
                  Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2018-07-08 15:02 -0700
                  Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-08 17:13 -0600
                  Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-09 17:05 +0000
                    Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-11 06:01 -0700
          Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete mid-voyage  was Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-07-07 22:51 -0700
            Re: YASID: Generation ship becomes obsolete - "Time for the Stars" a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-08 10:26 -0700
      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex hamish.laws@gmail.com - 2018-07-04 17:49 -0700
        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-08 13:50 -0700
          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2018-07-08 14:49 -0700
            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2018-07-08 15:10 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-08 15:40 -0700
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-08 18:12 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-09 00:02 -0600
                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-09 12:14 -0700
                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-09 13:07 -0700
                    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreheim.dimnakorr.com> - 2018-07-09 15:39 -0500
                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-09 14:46 -0700
                    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-09 22:15 -0600
                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2018-07-09 22:36 -0700
                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2018-07-11 04:59 +0000
                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-10 23:32 -0600
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-11 15:22 +0300
                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-11 04:07 -0700
                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-11 04:14 -0700
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-11 04:29 -0700
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2018-07-11 05:51 -0700
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-13 07:10 -0600
                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-11 04:58 -0700
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-07-11 14:06 +0000
                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-11 07:39 -0700
                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-11 16:56 +0000
                              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2018-07-11 18:04 +0000
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2018-07-11 08:12 -0700
                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-11 09:43 -0700
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2018-07-12 18:27 -0700
                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-13 07:08 -0600
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-13 15:02 -0700
                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2018-07-15 13:40 -0500
                              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-15 18:56 +0000
                                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 15:39 -0400
                                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-15 18:50 -0700
                                    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Lawrence Watt-Evans <misenchantedpress@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 23:37 -0400
                                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-16 03:40 +0000
                                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-16 12:54 -0700
                                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2018-07-16 14:18 -0700
                                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2018-07-18 07:56 -0500
                                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-16 13:02 -0700
                                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-15 23:11 -0600
                                      Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-16 06:46 -0600
                                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:57 +0300
                                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-16 22:04 -0600
                                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Lawrence Watt-Evans <misenchantedpress@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:04 -0400
                                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Magewolf <Magewolf@nc.rr.com> - 2018-07-16 15:17 -0400
                                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2018-07-16 19:58 +0000
                                              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2018-07-16 21:07 +0000
                                                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-16 20:24 -0700
                                                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-16 20:26 -0700
                                                    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2018-07-17 08:30 -0600
                                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:03 -0700
                                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2018-07-16 22:30 -0600
                                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Lawrence Watt-Evans <misenchantedpress@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 09:58 -0400
                                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2018-07-18 07:57 -0500
                                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-18 14:28 -0700
                                              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-18 14:31 -0700
                                        Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex P. Taine <user@domaine.invalid> - 2018-07-16 20:50 -0400
                                    Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2018-07-18 07:53 -0500
                          Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2018-07-13 16:48 -0600
                            Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-13 18:47 -0700
                              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-13 18:51 -0700
                                Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2018-07-14 08:12 -0700
                                  Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-07-14 09:00 -0700
              Re: Opinion on Generation ships size - Interstellar space travel will require sex Jack Bohn <jack.bohn64@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 03:31 -0700

Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →


#494615

FromDimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net>
Date2018-07-08 12:04 -0700
Message-ID<phtn8a$rgq$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#494604
On 7/8/2018 5:24 AM, Juho Julkunen wrote:
> In article <ccfda22c-c631-4a86-b34f-923b8b9f4d53@googlegroups.com>,
> jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says...
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 9:56:00 AM UTC-6, Kevrob wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, there's a good deal of "situational homosexuality"
>>> in human history in same-sex environments, such as prisons,
>>> or on long sea voyages. "Rum, sodomy and the lash" ring any
>>> bells? Or, look into the history of the US Navy at Newport,
>>> Rhode Island.  It isn't/wasn't just the Brits.
>>
>> That's precisely why an all-male crew needs to be avoided.
>>
>> An all-female crew poses a much smaller risk along those lines.
> 
> Joey, have you ever been in a women's prison?
> 
Isn't that a line from the movie 'Airplane!'?  :)

-- 
Inquiring minds want to know while minds with a self-preservation 
instinct are running screaming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494616

Fromted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>)
Date2018-07-08 19:20 +0000
Message-ID<fqf6flF87gvU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#494615
In article <phtn8a$rgq$1@dont-email.me>,
Dimensional Traveler  <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>On 7/8/2018 5:24 AM, Juho Julkunen wrote:
>> In article <ccfda22c-c631-4a86-b34f-923b8b9f4d53@googlegroups.com>,
>> jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says...
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 9:56:00 AM UTC-6, Kevrob wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed, there's a good deal of "situational homosexuality"
>>>> in human history in same-sex environments, such as prisons,
>>>> or on long sea voyages. "Rum, sodomy and the lash" ring any
>>>> bells? Or, look into the history of the US Navy at Newport,
>>>> Rhode Island.  It isn't/wasn't just the Brits.
>>>
>>> That's precisely why an all-male crew needs to be avoided.
>>>
>>> An all-female crew poses a much smaller risk along those lines.
>> 
>> Joey, have you ever been in a women's prison?
>> 
>Isn't that a line from the movie 'Airplane!'?  :)
>

You've got to set these up better.

The correct way:

	Surely that's a line from 'Airplane!'
-- 
------
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494620

FromQuadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
Date2018-07-08 13:41 -0700
Message-ID<e8415858-ed99-4484-a626-367a5db825bb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#494616
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:20:25 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:

> You've got to set these up better.
> 
> The correct way:
> 
> 	Surely that's a line from 'Airplane!'

Yes it is, and don't call me Shirley!

John Savard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494622

FromJuho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com>
Date2018-07-08 23:47 +0300
Message-ID<MPG.35aca4f624ad6c03989b1c@news.kolumbus.fi>
In reply to#494620
In article <e8415858-ed99-4484-a626-367a5db825bb@googlegroups.com>, 
jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says...
> 
> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:20:25 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> 
> > You've got to set these up better.
> > 
> > The correct way:
> > 
> > 	Surely that's a line from 'Airplane!'
> 
> Yes it is, and don't call me Shirley!

I just want to tell you both, good luck. We're all counting on you.

-- 
Juho Julkunen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494624

Fromted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>)
Date2018-07-08 20:56 +0000
Message-ID<fqfc3iF98idU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#494622
In article <MPG.35aca4f624ad6c03989b1c@news.kolumbus.fi>,
Juho Julkunen  <giaotanj@hotmail.com> wrote:
>In article <e8415858-ed99-4484-a626-367a5db825bb@googlegroups.com>, 
>jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says...
>> 
>> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:20:25 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
>> 
>> > You've got to set these up better.
>> > 
>> > The correct way:
>> > 
>> > 	Surely that's a line from 'Airplane!'
>> 
>> Yes it is, and don't call me Shirley!
>
>I just want to tell you both, good luck. We're all counting on you.
>

Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit usenet threads!
-- 
------
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494625

FromQuadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
Date2018-07-08 14:03 -0700
Message-ID<46b3b1f0-1a15-41b2-b046-26781e28efbd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#494624
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 2:56:22 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> In article <MPG.35aca4f624ad6c03989b1c@news.kolumbus.fi>,
> Juho Julkunen  <giaotanj@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <e8415858-ed99-4484-a626-367a5db825bb@googlegroups.com>, 
> >jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says...
> >> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:20:25 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:

> >> > You've got to set these up better.

> >> > The correct way:

> >> > 	Surely that's a line from 'Airplane!'

> >> Yes it is, and don't call me Shirley!

> >I just want to tell you both, good luck. We're all counting on you.

> Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit usenet threads!

On the other hand, how could he manage to avoid having people call him "Leslie"?

But then, maybe that's not the problem. Leslie _is_ a man's name, shared by 
Leslie Nielsen with Leslie Townes "Bob" Hope. The girl's name is Lesley, as 
Lesley Gore, for example, illustrates.

John Savard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494633

Fromnews{@bestley.co.uk (Mark Bestley)
Date2018-07-08 23:03 +0100
Message-ID<1nrn6im.n9k1if1qgkaweN%news{@bestley.co.uk>
In reply to#494625
Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:

> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 2:56:22 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> > In article <MPG.35aca4f624ad6c03989b1c@news.kolumbus.fi>,
> > Juho Julkunen  <giaotanj@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >In article <e8415858-ed99-4484-a626-367a5db825bb@googlegroups.com>,
> > >jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says...
> > >> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:20:25 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> 
> > >> > You've got to set these up better.
> 
> > >> > The correct way:
> 
> > >> >    Surely that's a line from 'Airplane!'
> 
> > >> Yes it is, and don't call me Shirley!
> 
> > >I just want to tell you both, good luck. We're all counting on you.
> 
> > Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit usenet threads!
> 
> On the other hand, how could he manage to avoid having people call him
"Leslie"?
> 
> But then, maybe that's not the problem. Leslie _is_ a man's name, shared by
> Leslie Nielsen with Leslie Townes "Bob" Hope. The girl's name is Lesley, as
> Lesley Gore, for example, illustrates.
> 
Thank heaven for little girls like Leslie Caron

-- 
Mark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494635

FromQuadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
Date2018-07-08 15:41 -0700
Message-ID<581853d9-f825-4cdc-9fb0-61ce80cb02de@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#494633
On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 4:11:45 PM UTC-6, Mark Bestley wrote:
 
> Thank heaven for little girls like Leslie Caron

...to prove me wrong yet again!

John Savard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494631

FromDimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net>
Date2018-07-08 15:06 -0700
Message-ID<phu1t1$u64$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#494616
On 7/8/2018 12:20 PM, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> In article <phtn8a$rgq$1@dont-email.me>,
> Dimensional Traveler  <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>> On 7/8/2018 5:24 AM, Juho Julkunen wrote:
>>> In article <ccfda22c-c631-4a86-b34f-923b8b9f4d53@googlegroups.com>,
>>> jsavard@ecn.ab.ca says...
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 9:56:00 AM UTC-6, Kevrob wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, there's a good deal of "situational homosexuality"
>>>>> in human history in same-sex environments, such as prisons,
>>>>> or on long sea voyages. "Rum, sodomy and the lash" ring any
>>>>> bells? Or, look into the history of the US Navy at Newport,
>>>>> Rhode Island.  It isn't/wasn't just the Brits.
>>>>
>>>> That's precisely why an all-male crew needs to be avoided.
>>>>
>>>> An all-female crew poses a much smaller risk along those lines.
>>>
>>> Joey, have you ever been in a women's prison?
>>>
>> Isn't that a line from the movie 'Airplane!'?  :)
>>
> 
> You've got to set these up better.
> 
> The correct way:
> 
> 	Surely that's a line from 'Airplane!'
> 
Don't call me Shirley.

-- 
Inquiring minds want to know while minds with a self-preservation 
instinct are running screaming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494428

Froma425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com>
Date2018-07-03 09:07 -0700
Message-ID<phg6qo012dm@news4.newsguy.com>
In reply to#494423
On 7/3/2018 8:13 AM, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
> 
>> What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>> During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>> best for functions and morale.
> 
> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
> 
> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to Mars, so that
> sex and jealousy can be avoided.
> John Savard

You seem to be thinking that a large number of females
put together as a crew, would not have issues relating
to jealousy (about rank, ratings, duties, tasks, popularity
etc.)
I'd disagree.

I'm also pretty sure that the physical acts of sex
could not be successfully prohibited.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494433

FromDavid Johnston <davidjohnston29@yahoo.com>
Date2018-07-03 11:52 -0600
Message-ID<phgd4k$1oh5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#494423
On 2018-07-03 9:13 AM, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
> 
>> What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>> During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>> best for functions and morale.
> 
> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
> 
> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to Mars, so that
> sex and jealousy can be avoided.

...your naivete never fails to startle.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494435

FromD B Davis <g@crcomp.net>
Date2018-07-03 20:17 +0000
Message-ID<20180703a@crcomp.net>
In reply to#494423
Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
>
>> What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>> During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>> best for functions and morale.
>
> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
>
> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to Mars, so that
> sex and jealousy can be avoided.

If _Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls_ (Simmons)
describes a phenomena that applies to females regardless of age, then 
you've bigger problems than merely avoiding sex.

✍

Thank you,

-- 
Don

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494438

Fromdjheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
Date2018-07-03 20:34 +0000
Message-ID<pBB55q.rCu@kithrup.com>
In reply to#494435
In article <20180703a@crcomp.net>, D B Davis  <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
>Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
>>
>>> What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>>> During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>>> best for functions and morale.
>>
>> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
>>
>> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to
>Mars, so that
>> sex and jealousy can be avoided.
>
>If _Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls_ (Simmons)
>describes a phenomena that applies to females regardless of age, then 
>you've bigger problems than merely avoiding sex.

Very likely.

Although I *think* it might be easier to select a crew of females
who would not be grown-up mean girls than to select a crew of
males who would not figure out some way of having sex even if no
members of their favorite gender were present.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494440

FromD B Davis <g@crcomp.net>
Date2018-07-03 22:44 +0000
Message-ID<20180703b@crcomp.net>
In reply to#494438
Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
> In article <20180703a@crcomp.net>, D B Davis  <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
>>Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
>>>
>>>> What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>>>> During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>>>> best for functions and morale.
>>>
>>> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
>>>
>>> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to
>>Mars, so that
>>> sex and jealousy can be avoided.
>>
>>If _Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls_ (Simmons)
>>describes a phenomena that applies to females regardless of age, then
>>you've bigger problems than merely avoiding sex.
>
> Very likely.
>
> Although I *think* it might be easier to select a crew of females
> who would not be grown-up mean girls than to select a crew of
> males who would not figure out some way of having sex even if no
> members of their favorite gender were present.
>

AFAIK DSM places the incidence of Cluster B personality disorders 
somewhere in the neighborhood of one in seven. So it's probable that
you can find a small "clean" crew for Mars.
    OTOH, if a Generation ship's population numbers in the thousands or 
more, it's a near certainty that Narcs, Psychos, and other undesirables 
are aboard. Is a Cluster B personality disorder strictly an inheritable 
affliction, or does it manifest itself regardless of the parents? In
the latter case some undesirables will spring up no matter how 
thoroughly you vet the initial population.

✍

Thank you,

-- 
Don

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494442

Fromdjheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
Date2018-07-04 00:00 +0000
Message-ID<pBBEos.1CGH@kithrup.com>
In reply to#494440
In article <20180703b@crcomp.net>, D B Davis  <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
>Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
>> In article <20180703a@crcomp.net>, D B Davis  <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
>>>Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>>>>> During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>>>>> best for functions and morale.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
>>>>
>>>> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to
>>>Mars, so that
>>>> sex and jealousy can be avoided.
>>>
>>>If _Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls_ (Simmons)
>>>describes a phenomena that applies to females regardless of age, then
>>>you've bigger problems than merely avoiding sex.
>>
>> Very likely.
>>
>> Although I *think* it might be easier to select a crew of females
>> who would not be grown-up mean girls than to select a crew of
>> males who would not figure out some way of having sex even if no
>> members of their favorite gender were present.
>>
>
>AFAIK DSM places the incidence of Cluster B personality disorders 
>somewhere in the neighborhood of one in seven. So it's probable that
>you can find a small "clean" crew for Mars.
>    OTOH, if a Generation ship's population numbers in the thousands or 
>more, it's a near certainty that Narcs, Psychos, and other undesirables 
>are aboard. Is a Cluster B personality disorder strictly an inheritable 
>affliction, or does it manifest itself regardless of the parents? In
>the latter case some undesirables will spring up no matter how 
>thoroughly you vet the initial population.

You're undoubtedly right.

The random thought once went through my mind of a series of
murder mysteries aboard a generation ship, cleverly solved by Lt.
Cdr. Marple.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494596

FromGene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net>
Date2018-07-07 22:32 -0700
Message-ID<re83kdtio9dhd1i2rpo1mj2v8lckauf81h@4ax.com>
In reply to#494442
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 00:00:28 GMT, djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
wrote:

[snip]

>The random thought once went through my mind of a series of
>murder mysteries aboard a generation ship, cleverly solved by Lt.
>Cdr. Marple.

     I want to read it!

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494647

From"Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.com>
Date2018-07-09 12:33 -0500
Message-ID<pi0696$cf9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#494442
On 7/3/2018 07:00 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
> In article <20180703b@crcomp.net>, D B Davis  <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
>> Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
>>> In article <20180703a@crcomp.net>, D B Davis  <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
>>>> Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>>>>>> During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>>>>>> best for functions and morale.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
>>>>>
>>>>> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to
>>>> Mars, so that
>>>>> sex and jealousy can be avoided.
>>>>
>>>> If _Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls_ (Simmons)
>>>> describes a phenomena that applies to females regardless of age, then
>>>> you've bigger problems than merely avoiding sex.
>>>
>>> Very likely.
>>>
>>> Although I *think* it might be easier to select a crew of females
>>> who would not be grown-up mean girls than to select a crew of
>>> males who would not figure out some way of having sex even if no
>>> members of their favorite gender were present.
>>>
>>
>> AFAIK DSM places the incidence of Cluster B personality disorders
>> somewhere in the neighborhood of one in seven. So it's probable that
>> you can find a small "clean" crew for Mars.
>>     OTOH, if a Generation ship's population numbers in the thousands or
>> more, it's a near certainty that Narcs, Psychos, and other undesirables
>> are aboard. Is a Cluster B personality disorder strictly an inheritable
>> affliction, or does it manifest itself regardless of the parents? In
>> the latter case some undesirables will spring up no matter how
>> thoroughly you vet the initial population.
> 
> You're undoubtedly right.
> 
> The random thought once went through my mind of a series of
> murder mysteries aboard a generation ship, cleverly solved by Lt.
> Cdr. Marple.
> 

I'd like to pre-order it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494745

Fromtsbrueni@gmail.com
Date2018-07-11 19:14 -0700
Message-ID<117c1a9c-47e9-4886-a027-067b6c5a83a3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#494423
On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 8:13:38 AM UTC-7, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
> 
> > What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
> > During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
> > best for functions and morale.
> 
> Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
> 
> I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to Mars, so that 
> sex and jealousy can be avoided.

What if they are lesbians?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494747

FromKevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com>
Date2018-07-11 19:37 -0700
Message-ID<913cee03-bc06-4b57-ab82-322bf481b1b1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#494745
On Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 10:14:33 PM UTC-4, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 8:13:38 AM UTC-7, Quadibloc wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
> > 
> > > What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
> > > During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
> > > best for functions and morale.
> > 
> > Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
> > 
> > I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to Mars, so that 
> > sex and jealousy can be avoided.
> 
> What if they are lesbians?

You are about 8 days behind on that point.

Even if they were all straight women, having grown up in
a household with 5 sisters, I ask: what planet will you 
recruit these jealousy-free people from?  Sex/gender 
doesn't even come into it. I also have 3 brothers, and
we weren't jealousy-free either.

I've seen worse fights over "you wore my sweater set/
sportcoat without asking" than over "you flirted with
my sweet baboo!"

Kevin R

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#494748

Fromted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>)
Date2018-07-12 02:53 +0000
Message-ID<fqnu4sFrossU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#494747
In article <913cee03-bc06-4b57-ab82-322bf481b1b1@googlegroups.com>,
Kevrob  <kevrob@my-deja.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 10:14:33 PM UTC-4, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 8:13:38 AM UTC-7, Quadibloc wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 7:06:20 AM UTC-6, a425couple wrote:
>> > 
>> > > What are you seeing is the advantage of "all female crew" ?
>> > > During the journey seems to me a normal mix is probably
>> > > best for functions and morale.
>> > 
>> > Indeed, for a voyage to Alpha Centauri.
>> > 
>> > I could see an all-female crew being of an advantage for a trip to
>Mars, so that 
>> > sex and jealousy can be avoided.
>> 
>> What if they are lesbians?
>
>You are about 8 days behind on that point.
>
>Even if they were all straight women, having grown up in
>a household with 5 sisters, I ask: what planet will you 
>recruit these jealousy-free people from?  Sex/gender 
>doesn't even come into it. I also have 3 brothers, and
>we weren't jealousy-free either.
>
>I've seen worse fights over "you wore my sweater set/
>sportcoat without asking" than over "you flirted with
>my sweet baboo!"
>

I'm not your sweet baboo!
-- 
------
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written


csiph-web