Re: Einstein Bolshevik

Message-ID	<55F66DA9.4F24@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2015-09-13 23:48 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written
Subject	Re: Einstein Bolshevik
References	(1 earlier) <231aa108-c0f7-4207-9e78-586104dfaa54@googlegroups.com> <55F4F55C.2F12@ix.netcom.com> <4fa0e59c-31df-4a25-a11c-eff861e99cff@googlegroups.com> <XnsA5146D3A72208taustingmail@69.16.179.42> <53e6a05e-2348-4179-ad31-1a339baaf58f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Robert Carnegie wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, 13 September 2015 18:44:18 UTC+1, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy  wrote:
> > Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
> > news:4fa0e59c-31df-4a25-a11c-eff861e99cff@googlegroups.com:
> >
> > > On Sunday, 13 September 2015 05:02:07 UTC+1, The Starmaker
> > > wrote:
> > >> Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > On Saturday, 12 September 2015 07:33:37 UTC+1, The Starmaker
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > Professor Albert Einstein is nothing but a "Bolshevist
> > >> > > agent,"
> > >> > > http://www.jta.org/1934/08/22/archive/einstein-bolshevik-say
> > >> > > s-nazi-chief
> > >> >
> > >> > But, really, what part of "Go ****** yourself, Starmaker,
> > >> > you anti-Semitic *******-*****" is it that is difficult
> > >> > to understand?
> > >> >
> > >> > Perhaps the implicit codicil, "and trouble us no more",
> > >> > is what isn't getting through.
> > >> >
> > >> > Go away, you ******** of unwashed ****************.
> > >>
> > >> Telling the Truth is anit-Semitic, right?
> > >
> > > And still the message is not got.  Go.  Away.
> > >
> > > Anyway, this newsgroup is for discussing science fiction;
> > > what does The Truth, or any truth, have to do with that?
> > >
> > Are you really so fucking *stupid* that you think getting that
> > pissed off will do anything other than keep him here? *You*,
> > personally, are the direct reason he keeps replying, dumbass.
> >
> > Yes, you *are* that fucking *stupid*.
> >
> > Dumbass.
> 
> Maybe I should explain myself.  Starmaker unfortunately is
> happy enough to reply to himself, over and over again.
> Generally I don't engage with him or her; I don't even
> read the stuff.  This time, I decided - not particularly
> for Starmaker's benefit - to comment on their curious
> determination to verbally attack The Jews, in the face
> of a consensus of uninterest or disgust.


Sorry Robert, I didn't mean to ingnite your anti-semetic impulses.

Thread

csiph-web