Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > perl.modules > #38262 > unrolled thread

DateTime::Format::Natural: PAUSE vs www.cpan.org vs MetaCPAN discrepancy

Back to article view | Back to perl.modules

Contents

  DateTime::Format::Natural: PAUSE vs www.cpan.org vs MetaCPAN discrepancy schubiger@cpan.org (Steven Schubiger) - 2026-02-20 21:16 +0100
    Re: DateTime::Format::Natural: PAUSE vs www.cpan.org vs MetaCPANdiscrepancy schubiger@cpan.org (Steven Schubiger) - 2026-02-23 18:31 +0100
    Re: DateTime::Format::Natural: PAUSE vs www.cpan.org vs MetaCPANdiscrepancy haarg@haarg.org (Graham Knop) - 2026-02-23 16:18 +0100

#38262 — DateTime::Format::Natural: PAUSE vs www.cpan.org vs MetaCPAN discrepancy

Hi,

All three of them have differing file "states", i.e. PAUSE is clean
(no dev files, etc.) whereas www.cpan.org is quite messy compared to
MetaCPAN, which is less chaotic.

It has been like that for several weeks now...

Let me know, if you need more information.

thanks,

-- 
Down that path lies madness. On the other hand,
the road to hell is paved with melting snowballs.
    -- Larry Wall

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#38267 — Re: DateTime::Format::Natural: PAUSE vs www.cpan.org vs MetaCPANdiscrepancy

Graham Knop <haarg@haarg.org> wrote:
> It's not obvious what you mean by "clean", "messy", or "chaotic". Can you
> describe the discrepancy you are seeing?
> 
> It's expected for MetaCPAN to keep releases even after they are deleted from
> CPAN.

PAUSE
=====
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.24.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.24.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.24.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.25.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.25.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.25.tar.gz [indexed]

www.cpan.org
============
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.20.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.20.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.20.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.21.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.21.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.21.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.22.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.22.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.22.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.22_01.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.22_02.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23_01.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23_02.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.23_03.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.24.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.24.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.24.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.24_01.tar.gz
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.25.meta
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.25.readme
DateTime-Format-Natural-1.25.tar.gz

MetaCPAN
========
1.25
1.24
1.23
1.22_02
1.22_01
1.20

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38268 — Re: DateTime::Format::Natural: PAUSE vs www.cpan.org vs MetaCPANdiscrepancy

On 20/02/2026 21:16, Steven Schubiger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> All three of them have differing file "states", i.e. PAUSE is clean
> (no dev files, etc.) whereas www.cpan.org is quite messy compared to
> MetaCPAN, which is less chaotic.
> 
> It has been like that for several weeks now...
> 
> Let me know, if you need more information.
> 
> thanks,
> 

It's not obvious what you mean by "clean", "messy", or "chaotic". Can 
you describe the discrepancy you are seeing?

It's expected for MetaCPAN to keep releases even after they are deleted 
from CPAN.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | perl.modules

csiph-web