Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > perl.module-authors > #3341

Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s?

Newsgroups perl.module-authors
Message-ID <5B701E10.3080403@tlinx.org> (permalink)
Date 2018-08-12 04:46 -0700
Subject Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s?
References <20180811225149.6accd79e@telaviv1.shlomifish.org>
From law@tlinx.org ("Linda A. Walsh")

Show all headers | View raw


Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
> do you think I was being unreasonable, or should I as a CPAN
> author/maintainer/adopter accommodate for people running old perl5s, in my case 5.10.x and below:
>
>   
Going backwards it becomes more difficult to support an old version, 
along with
older versions having fewer users.

I tested some of my modules back to 5.8.  I didn't test any on 5.6, as 
it was
just too hard to build.  If there was a clamor to support some of my modules
on 5.6, I might ask the reporter to do testing and try to see if I can 
fix something.

Of course this implies only using a 'core perl' that worked on 5.6.x to 
develop
extensions in -- another thing that might cause problems.

Another issue -- how many years ago was the release?

If it is old enough, it might be argued that it is hard to support some 
things
on SW so old, it may have scores of unpatched bugs.

Really though, I can't imagine that *one* answer would work for every 
situation.

OTOH, if the user wants to add support for the old version, you might be 
willing to merge the changes into your source?

Just thinking...

my 4 cents (used to be 2 -- inflation hit).

-l

Back to perl.module-authors | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-11 22:51 +0300
  Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? corliss@digitalmages.com (Arthur Corliss) - 2018-08-12 02:09 -0800
  Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? law@tlinx.org ("Linda A. Walsh") - 2018-08-12 04:46 -0700
    Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-28 01:58 +0300
  Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-17 17:26 +0300
    Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? rcaputo@pobox.com (Rocco Caputo) - 2018-08-17 13:28 -0400
      Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-28 01:45 +0300

csiph-web