Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > perl.module-authors > #3341
| Newsgroups | perl.module-authors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5B701E10.3080403@tlinx.org> (permalink) |
| Date | 2018-08-12 04:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? |
| References | <20180811225149.6accd79e@telaviv1.shlomifish.org> |
| From | law@tlinx.org ("Linda A. Walsh") |
Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi all! > do you think I was being unreasonable, or should I as a CPAN > author/maintainer/adopter accommodate for people running old perl5s, in my case 5.10.x and below: > > Going backwards it becomes more difficult to support an old version, along with older versions having fewer users. I tested some of my modules back to 5.8. I didn't test any on 5.6, as it was just too hard to build. If there was a clamor to support some of my modules on 5.6, I might ask the reporter to do testing and try to see if I can fix something. Of course this implies only using a 'core perl' that worked on 5.6.x to develop extensions in -- another thing that might cause problems. Another issue -- how many years ago was the release? If it is old enough, it might be argued that it is hard to support some things on SW so old, it may have scores of unpatched bugs. Really though, I can't imagine that *one* answer would work for every situation. OTOH, if the user wants to add support for the old version, you might be willing to merge the changes into your source? Just thinking... my 4 cents (used to be 2 -- inflation hit). -l
Back to perl.module-authors | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-11 22:51 +0300
Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? corliss@digitalmages.com (Arthur Corliss) - 2018-08-12 02:09 -0800
Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? law@tlinx.org ("Linda A. Walsh") - 2018-08-12 04:46 -0700
Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-28 01:58 +0300
Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-17 17:26 +0300
Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? rcaputo@pobox.com (Rocco Caputo) - 2018-08-17 13:28 -0400
Re: [RANT] Should we try to keep compatibility with old perl5s? shlomif@shlomifish.org (Shlomi Fish) - 2018-08-28 01:45 +0300
csiph-web