Groups > muc.lists.netbsd.tech.toolchain > #3636

re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ

From	matthew green <mrg@eterna23.net>
Newsgroups	muc.lists.netbsd.tech.toolchain
Subject	re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Date	2026-08-17 19:11 +1000
Organization	Newsgate at muc.de e.V.
Message-ID	<29434.1786957866@splode.eterna23.net> (permalink)
References	<aoK5_7gHb1Ckf4fC@exadelic.gatalith.at>

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas Klausner writes:
> Did you comment out that CONFIGURE_ARGS line when testing?

yes.  well, i did forget for the 2nd time, but when it finished
really fast, i realised and did it again.


.mrg.

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de

Back to muc.lists.netbsd.tech.toolchain | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ matthew green <mrg@eterna23.net> - 2026-08-16 08:43 +1000
  Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ Thomas Klausner <wiz@netbsd.org> - 2026-08-16 19:51 +0200
    re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ matthew green <mrg@eterna23.net> - 2026-08-17 10:41 +1000
      re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ matthew green <mrg@eterna23.net> - 2026-08-17 13:22 +1000
        Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ Thomas Klausner <wiz@netbsd.org> - 2026-08-17 09:37 +0200
          re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ matthew green <mrg@eterna23.net> - 2026-08-17 19:11 +1000

csiph-web