Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1740665 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-27 14:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-27 15:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last sample time Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-09-27 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last sample time "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-27 15:10 +0200
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 14:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last sample time |
| Message-ID | <uujtN-2gN-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 06:57:58PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> In perf record, it's walked on all samples yet. So it's very easy to get
> the first/last samples and save the time to perf file header via the
> function write_sample_time().
>
> In later, perf report/script will fetch the time from perf file header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 9b379f3..3428633 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ struct record {
> bool timestamp_filename;
> struct switch_output switch_output;
> unsigned long long samples;
> + u64 first_sample_time;
> + u64 last_sample_time;
so we have those 2 u64 already in 3 structs: evlist, session and now record
can't we do that with just in one? I'd think all of them should be available
and reachable everywhere
jirka
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uukga-35a-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1740665 |
On 9/27/2017 8:16 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 06:57:58PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>> In perf record, it's walked on all samples yet. So it's very easy to get
>> the first/last samples and save the time to perf file header via the
>> function write_sample_time().
>>
>> In later, perf report/script will fetch the time from perf file header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>> index 9b379f3..3428633 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ struct record {
>> bool timestamp_filename;
>> struct switch_output switch_output;
>> unsigned long long samples;
>> + u64 first_sample_time;
>> + u64 last_sample_time;
>
> so we have those 2 u64 already in 3 structs: evlist, session and now record
>
> can't we do that with just in one? I'd think all of them should be available
> and reachable everywhere
>
> jirka
>
Thanks!
Yes, you are right. It looks we only need to define them in evlist.
If no other comments, I will prepare v3 to fix this.
Thanks
Jin Yao
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web