Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1739341 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-26 01:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-26 08:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-26 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-09-26 08:40 +0200
| From | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-26 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag |
| Message-ID | <utKPq-4Lc-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling
bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a
struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working.
This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in
xfs_fs_fill_super().
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
index 26faeb9..0433aef 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@ -1088,6 +1088,7 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_dax_invalidate(
int *join_flags)
{
struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip);
+ struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
int error;
*join_flags = 0;
@@ -1100,7 +1101,7 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_dax_invalidate(
if (fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX) {
if (!(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize != PAGE_SIZE)
+ if (bdev_dax_supported(sb, sb->s_blocksize) < 0)
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.9.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-26 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utRHc-10R-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1739341 |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:13:59PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling > bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a > struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working. > > This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in > xfs_fs_fill_super(). > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> I think we just want to pick this up ASAP. And between my vague memoried and that reviewed-by tag it already was part of a different series, wasn't it?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web