Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1737599 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-22 18:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-25 17:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-09-22 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-09-25 17:50 +0200
| From | Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static |
| Message-ID | <usyGB-8dH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The functions tve200_display_disable and tve200_display_funcs are
local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make
them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'tve200_display_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'tve200_display_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
index 18457de47bbc..904e38b93530 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static void tve200_display_enable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
drm_crtc_vblank_on(crtc);
}
-void tve200_display_disable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe)
+static void tve200_display_disable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe)
{
struct drm_crtc *crtc = &pipe->crtc;
struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int tve200_display_prepare_fb(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
return drm_fb_cma_prepare_fb(&pipe->plane, plane_state);
}
-const struct drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs tve200_display_funcs = {
+static const struct drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs tve200_display_funcs = {
.check = tve200_display_check,
.enable = tve200_display_enable,
.disable = tve200_display_disable,
--
2.14.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utDNU-8jd-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1737599 |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > The functions tve200_display_disable and tve200_display_funcs are > local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make > them static. > > Cleans up sparse warnings: > symbol 'tve200_display_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? > symbol 'tve200_display_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> I am travelling right now but will apply the patch on monday in one week from now. Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web