Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1737599 > unrolled thread

[PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static

Started byColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
First post2017-09-22 18:10 +0200
Last post2017-09-25 17:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-09-22 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-09-25 17:50 +0200

#1737599 — [PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static

FromColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date2017-09-22 18:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH][drm-next] drm/tve200: make two functions static
Message-ID<usyGB-8dH-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The functions tve200_display_disable and tve200_display_funcs are
local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make
them static.

Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'tve200_display_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'tve200_display_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
index 18457de47bbc..904e38b93530 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static void tve200_display_enable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
 	drm_crtc_vblank_on(crtc);
 }
 
-void tve200_display_disable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe)
+static void tve200_display_disable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe)
 {
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc = &pipe->crtc;
 	struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int tve200_display_prepare_fb(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
 	return drm_fb_cma_prepare_fb(&pipe->plane, plane_state);
 }
 
-const struct drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs tve200_display_funcs = {
+static const struct drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs tve200_display_funcs = {
 	.check = tve200_display_check,
 	.enable = tve200_display_enable,
 	.disable = tve200_display_disable,
-- 
2.14.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1739130

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2017-09-25 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<utDNU-8jd-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1737599
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The functions tve200_display_disable and tve200_display_funcs are
> local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make
> them static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'tve200_display_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?
> symbol 'tve200_display_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I am travelling right now but will apply the patch on monday in
one week from now.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web