Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1737721 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource accounting

Started byTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
First post2017-09-22 20:10 +0200
Last post2017-09-25 17:10 +0200
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource  accounting Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-09-22 20:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource  accounting Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-23 15:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource  accounting Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-09-23 15:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource  accounting Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-25 09:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource  accounting Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-09-25 17:10 +0200

#1737721 — Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource accounting

FromTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date2017-09-22 20:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource accounting
Message-ID<usAyK-Tw-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Peter, ping?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1738035

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2017-09-23 15:40 +0200
Message-ID<usSP0-3FE-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1737721
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:05:30AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Peter, ping?

Humm,. So I think I was good, but I was under the impression you'd send
a new version better explaining the need/design of that iteration stuff.
Could be I lost the plot somehow.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1738037

FromTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date2017-09-23 15:50 +0200
Message-ID<usSYF-3IO-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1738035
Hello, Peter.

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 03:37:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:05:30AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Peter, ping?
> 
> Humm,. So I think I was good, but I was under the impression you'd send
> a new version better explaining the need/design of that iteration stuff.
> Could be I lost the plot somehow.

The updated version was posted quite a while ago.

  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170829174325.GS491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1738788

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2017-09-25 09:30 +0200
Message-ID<utw01-3bl-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1738037
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 06:44:02AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Peter.
> 
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 03:37:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:05:30AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Peter, ping?
> > 
> > Humm,. So I think I was good, but I was under the impression you'd send
> > a new version better explaining the need/design of that iteration stuff.
> > Could be I lost the plot somehow.
> 
> The updated version was posted quite a while ago.
> 
>   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170829174325.GS491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com


Oh that's in the same thread, wasn't expecting that. Look ok I suppose.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1739112

FromTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date2017-09-25 17:10 +0200
Message-ID<utDbb-82e-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1738788
Hello,

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:27:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 06:44:02AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Peter.
> > 
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 03:37:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:05:30AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > > Peter, ping?
> > > 
> > > Humm,. So I think I was good, but I was under the impression you'd send
> > > a new version better explaining the need/design of that iteration stuff.
> > > Could be I lost the plot somehow.
> > 
> > The updated version was posted quite a while ago.
> > 
> >   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170829174325.GS491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com
> 
> 
> Oh that's in the same thread, wasn't expecting that. Look ok I suppose.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Applying to cgroup/for-4.15.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web