Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1737812 > unrolled thread
| Started by | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-22 22:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-23 17:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/8] [media] v4l2-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-09-22 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/8] [media] v4l2-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> - 2017-09-23 09:40 +0200
Re: [media] v4l2-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-09-23 17:30 +0200
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] [media] v4l2-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations |
| Message-ID | <usCqT-21j-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
> Sorry Markus, just stay away from the videobuf-* sources. Will the software evolution be continued for related source files? Are there any update candidates left over in the directory “v4l2-core”? Regards, Markus
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-23 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <usNcC-c7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1737812 |
On 22/09/17 22:08, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> Sorry Markus, just stay away from the videobuf-* sources. > > Will the software evolution be continued for related source files? > Are there any update candidates left over in the directory “v4l2-core”? Sorry, I don't understand the question. We don't want to touch the videobuf-* files unless there is a very good reason. That old videobuf framework is deprecated and the code is quite fragile (i.e. easy to break things). Everything else in that directory is under continuous development. It's core code though, so it gets a much more in-depth code review than patches for e.g. a driver. Regards, Hans
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-23 17:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [media] v4l2-core: Fine-tuning for some function implementations |
| Message-ID | <usUxr-4MR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1737974 |
>> Will the software evolution be continued for related source files? >> Are there any update candidates left over in the directory “v4l2-core”? > > Sorry, I don't understand the question. I try to explain my view again. > We don't want to touch the videobuf-* files unless there is a very good reason. I hoped that my update suggestions could be good enough once more for this area. > That old videobuf framework is deprecated and the code is quite fragile > (i.e. easy to break things). How do you think about to move this stuff into a separate subdirectory so that it might become a bit easier to distinguish these software components? > Everything else in that directory is under continuous development. I am curious if there are still update candidates left over (also from my selection of change possibilities). Regards, Markus
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web