Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1735636 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-20 10:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-21 14:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 03/10] coda: honor AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> - 2017-09-20 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 03/10] coda: honor AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu> - 2017-09-20 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 03/10] coda: honor AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> - 2017-09-21 14:50 +0200
| From | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-20 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 03/10] coda: honor AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC |
| Message-ID | <urIRH-Bk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The description of this flag says "Don't sync attributes with the server".
In other words: always use the attributes cached in the kernel and don't
send network or local messages to refresh the attributes.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
---
fs/coda/inode.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/coda/inode.c b/fs/coda/inode.c
index 6058df380cc0..734672b2cbdc 100644
--- a/fs/coda/inode.c
+++ b/fs/coda/inode.c
@@ -255,7 +255,10 @@ static void coda_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
int coda_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
u32 request_mask, unsigned int flags)
{
- int err = coda_revalidate_inode(d_inode(path->dentry));
+ int err = 0;
+
+ if (!(flags & AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC))
+ err = coda_revalidate_inode(d_inode(path->dentry));
if (!err)
generic_fillattr(d_inode(path->dentry), stat);
return err;
--
2.5.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-20 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <urTWN-7Xi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1735636 |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:39:58AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> The description of this flag says "Don't sync attributes with the server".
> In other words: always use the attributes cached in the kernel and don't
> send network or local messages to refresh the attributes.
What is the use case for this AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC flag?
I'm asking because the Coda userspace client potentially has attributes
that are not cached in the kernel but can be (re-)validated without
network communication. So if we just care about avoiding network
traffic we could propagate the flag up to userspace. If we want to avoid
context switches, disk I/O and only check on what happens to be cached
in the kernel the current approach works fine.
Jan
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
> ---
> fs/coda/inode.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/coda/inode.c b/fs/coda/inode.c
> index 6058df380cc0..734672b2cbdc 100644
> --- a/fs/coda/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/coda/inode.c
> @@ -255,7 +255,10 @@ static void coda_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> int coda_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
> u32 request_mask, unsigned int flags)
> {
> - int err = coda_revalidate_inode(d_inode(path->dentry));
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (!(flags & AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC))
> + err = coda_revalidate_inode(d_inode(path->dentry));
> if (!err)
> generic_fillattr(d_inode(path->dentry), stat);
> return err;
> --
> 2.5.5
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-21 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <us95w-13h-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1736090 |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:39:58AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> The description of this flag says "Don't sync attributes with the server".
>> In other words: always use the attributes cached in the kernel and don't
>> send network or local messages to refresh the attributes.
>
> What is the use case for this AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC flag?
>
> I'm asking because the Coda userspace client potentially has attributes
> that are not cached in the kernel but can be (re-)validated without
> network communication. So if we just care about avoiding network
> traffic we could propagate the flag up to userspace. If we want to avoid
> context switches, disk I/O and only check on what happens to be cached
> in the kernel the current approach works fine.
It's an interesting question, "server" could mean several different
things depending on the context. I interpreted it as "any entity
outside the kernel the filesystem resides in", mainly because it's the
simplest interpretation.
Thanks,
Miklos
>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
>> ---
>> fs/coda/inode.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/coda/inode.c b/fs/coda/inode.c
>> index 6058df380cc0..734672b2cbdc 100644
>> --- a/fs/coda/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/coda/inode.c
>> @@ -255,7 +255,10 @@ static void coda_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
>> int coda_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
>> u32 request_mask, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> - int err = coda_revalidate_inode(d_inode(path->dentry));
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!(flags & AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC))
>> + err = coda_revalidate_inode(d_inode(path->dentry));
>> if (!err)
>> generic_fillattr(d_inode(path->dentry), stat);
>> return err;
>> --
>> 2.5.5
>>
>>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web