Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1733034 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-15 21:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-19 07:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: qcom: smem: Rename "uncached" accessors Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-09-15 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: qcom: smem: Rename "uncached" accessors Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-09-16 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: qcom: smem: Rename "uncached" accessors Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-09-19 07:40 +0200
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-15 21:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: qcom: smem: Rename "uncached" accessors |
| Message-ID | <uq4jD-7gb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 08/14, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > In preparation for adding accessors for "cached" entries rename the > "uncached" accessors to. Also rename "first" cached entry to "last", as s/to/too? or to "uncached"? > the cached list grows backwards. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-16 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uq7rb-OY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1733034 |
On Fri 15 Sep 12:19 PDT 2017, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 08/14, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > In preparation for adding accessors for "cached" entries rename the > > "uncached" accessors to. Also rename "first" cached entry to "last", as > > s/to/too? or to "uncached"? > Doesn't it make more sense if we ju just make it: rename the "uncached" accessors? I.e just drop the "to". > > the cached list grows backwards. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> > > > Otherwise, > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> > Thanks, Bjorn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-19 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <urjqi-8ru-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1733124 |
On 09/15, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Fri 15 Sep 12:19 PDT 2017, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 08/14, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > In preparation for adding accessors for "cached" entries rename the > > > "uncached" accessors to. Also rename "first" cached entry to "last", as > > > > s/to/too? or to "uncached"? > > > > Doesn't it make more sense if we ju just make it: rename the "uncached" > accessors? I.e just drop the "to". > Yes. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web