Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1732283 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-14 15:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-14 15:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [v4 01/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Use shared-dma-pool for BMan private memory allocations Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-09-14 15:50 +0200
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-14 15:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [v4 01/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Use shared-dma-pool for BMan private memory allocations |
| Message-ID | <upCGK-5GI-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:37:45PM -0400, Roy Pledge wrote:
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_ccsr.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_ccsr.c
[...]
> @@ -201,6 +202,38 @@ static int fsl_bman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If FBPR memory wasn't defined using the qbman compatible string
> + * try using the of_reserved_mem_device method
> + */
> + if (!fbpr_a) {
> + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "of_reserved_mem_device_init() failed 0x%x\n",
> + ret);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + mem_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "memory-region", 0);
> + if (mem_node) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u64(mem_node, "size", &size);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "FBPR: of_address_to_resource fails 0x%x\n",
> + ret);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + fbpr_sz = size;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "No memory-region found for FBPR\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + if (!dma_zalloc_coherent(dev, fbpr_sz, &fbpr_a, 0)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Alloc FBPR memory failed\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + }
At a quick look, I think I spotted this pattern a couple of more times
in the subsequent patch. Could it be moved to a common function?
--
Catalin
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web