Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1727369 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] spi: Use ida to manage SPI bus number

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH] spi: Use ida to manage SPI bus number Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> - 2017-09-06 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] spi: Use ida to manage SPI bus number Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-06 15:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] spi: Use ida to manage SPI bus number Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> - 2017-09-08 08:30 +0200

#1727369 — [PATCH] spi: Use ida to manage SPI bus number

This patch adds one static ida variable to manage SPI bus number, moreover
we can get dynamic bus number from ida instead of one "dynamic" IDs, which
can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c |   21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 4fcbb0a..1498be2 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -40,10 +40,13 @@
 #include <linux/ioport.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/highmem.h>
+#include <linux/idr.h>
 
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include <trace/events/spi.h>
 
+static DEFINE_IDA(spi_bus_ida);
+
 static void spidev_release(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct spi_device	*spi = to_spi_device(dev);
@@ -2052,7 +2055,6 @@ static int of_spi_register_master(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
  */
 int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 {
-	static atomic_t		dyn_bus_id = ATOMIC_INIT((1<<15) - 1);
 	struct device		*dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
 	struct boardinfo	*bi;
 	int			status = -ENODEV;
@@ -2076,12 +2078,15 @@ int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 	if ((ctlr->bus_num < 0) && ctlr->dev.of_node)
 		ctlr->bus_num = of_alias_get_id(ctlr->dev.of_node, "spi");
 
-	/* convention:  dynamically assigned bus IDs count down from the max */
+	if (ctlr->bus_num >= 0)
+		ctlr->bus_num = ida_simple_get(&spi_bus_ida, ctlr->bus_num,
+					       ctlr->bus_num + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	if (ctlr->bus_num < 0) {
-		/* FIXME switch to an IDR based scheme, something like
-		 * I2C now uses, so we can't run out of "dynamic" IDs
-		 */
-		ctlr->bus_num = atomic_dec_return(&dyn_bus_id);
+		ctlr->bus_num = ida_simple_get(&spi_bus_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (ctlr->bus_num < 0)
+			return ctlr->bus_num;
+
 		dynamic = 1;
 	}
 
@@ -2128,7 +2133,10 @@ int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 	/* Register devices from the device tree and ACPI */
 	of_register_spi_devices(ctlr);
 	acpi_register_spi_devices(ctlr);
+
+	return 0;
 done:
+	ida_simple_remove(&spi_bus_ida, ctlr->bus_num);
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_register_controller);
@@ -2202,6 +2210,7 @@ void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 	list_del(&ctlr->list);
 	mutex_unlock(&board_lock);
 
+	ida_simple_remove(&spi_bus_ida, ctlr->bus_num);
 	dummy = device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister);
 	device_unregister(&ctlr->dev);
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1727469

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:26:51PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> This patch adds one static ida variable to manage SPI bus number, moreover
> we can get dynamic bus number from ida instead of one "dynamic" IDs, which
> can be removed.

Someone else actually addressed this TODO item just in the last
development cycle, v4.14 should contain an equivalent patch.  Always
best to check linux-next for the latest development state!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1728629

Hi Mark,

On 6 September 2017 at 21:28, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:26:51PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> This patch adds one static ida variable to manage SPI bus number, moreover
>> we can get dynamic bus number from ida instead of one "dynamic" IDs, which
>> can be removed.
>
> Someone else actually addressed this TODO item just in the last
> development cycle, v4.14 should contain an equivalent patch.  Always
> best to check linux-next for the latest development state!

Yes, I saw that patch. Then ignore this patch, sorry.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web