Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1728364 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-07 20:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-09 01:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> - 2017-09-07 20:30 +0200
Re: XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2017-09-08 01:40 +0200
Re: XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-09-08 09:20 +0200
Re: XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> - 2017-09-08 19:20 +0200
Re: XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow Hao Chen <haochen@amazon.com> - 2017-09-09 01:30 +0200
| From | "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-07 20:30 +0200 |
| Subject | XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow |
| Message-ID | <un9IS-3K0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi XFS mailing list, Recently we received a bug report in the XFS filesystem with 'discard' option. I have been able to reproduce this issue. I used XFS filesystem to format NVMe SSD and mounted with 'discard' option. When I tried to delete the test fio files, the session took long time. This issue is based on Linux 4.9 stable tree. I have also repeated this test with Linux 4.13, 4.12, and we are facing the same issue. Tests were repeated several times and it was consistent. Please see details below. 1. Kernel version: Linux ip-172-31-6-243 4.9.32-15.41.amzn1.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 22 06:20:54 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting --> Interrupt with Ctrl+C # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* --> The session hangs and in 'blocked' state $ dmesg ... [ 492.329896] INFO: task rm:9231 blocked for more than 120 seconds. ... Then I tried to backport some patches and repeated the test. The issue has been improved. Eventually 'rm' command completed but took long time(2min). * Backported patch: 4560e78 xfs: don't block the log commit handler for discards # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting --> Interrupt with Ctrl+C # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* real 2m2.242s user 0m0.000s sys 0m25.524s 2. With Linux 4.12 and 4.13.0-rc1, the issue has been improved and the command is not stuck. But 'rm' command still takes long time (more than 1min). Please see details below. Kernel version: Linux version 4.13.0-rc1+ (ec2-user@ip-172-31-21-25) (gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-9) (GCC)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 21 17:31:06 UTC 2017 # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting --> Interrupt at about 37% # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* real 1m57.912s user 0m0.000s sys 0m28.810s Compare this result with: a) XFS mounted with 'nodiscard' option: It took less than 1min to run 'rm' command. # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting --> Interrupt at about 39% # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* real 0m31.176s user 0m0.000s sys 0m30.005s b) EXT4 file system mounted with 'discard' option: It only took about several seconds to run 'rm' command. # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting --> Interrupt at about 36.2% # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* real 0m4.661s user 0m0.000s sys 0m4.657s Please note if I wait for 'fio' command 100% done, 'rm' command took less than 1s (0m0.001s). 3. Shell script which triggers the problem sudo su - yum install xfsprogs fio -y mkfs.xfs -K -f -s size=4096 /dev/nvme0n1 mkdir -p /media/disk1 mount -o discard /dev/nvme0n1 /media/disk1 cd /media/disk1/ fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting # Interrupt with Ctrl+C time rm -rf fio_test_file.* Best Regards, Qian Lu
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-08 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uneyR-6Vy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1728364 |
[Your email is full of wacky symbols and needs line wrapping at 72 columns] On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:22:22PM +0000, Lu, Qian wrote: > Recently we received a bug report in the XFS filesystem with > 'discard' option. I have been able to reproduce this issue. I used > XFS filesystem to format NVMe SSD and mounted with 'discard' > option. When I tried to delete the test fio files, the session > took long time. This issue is based on Linux 4.9 stable tree. I > have also repeated this test with Linux 4.13, 4.12, and we are > facing the same issue. Tests were repeated several times and it > was consistent. ..... > > # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting > --> Interrupt with Ctrl+C > # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* > real 2m2.242s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m25.524s 4k random write with direct IO. 5GB file. Probably got a million 4k extents in it. Which means XFS has sent a million tiny 4k discards to the device. Run 'xfs_bmap -vvp fio_test_file.*' to confirm. Don't use "-o discard" if you care about performance. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-08 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <unlK3-3Bf-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1728508 |
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:34:02AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > 4k random write with direct IO. 5GB file. Probably got a million 4k > extents in it. Which means XFS has sent a million tiny 4k discards > to the device. Run 'xfs_bmap -vvp fio_test_file.*' to confirm. > > Don't use "-o discard" if you care about performance. And your device sucks :) Some numbers here: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/discard_0.pdf Discard will cause extra work, and for worst case sceanarios lots of it. But some device handle that extra load very well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-08 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <unv6G-1yj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1728364 |
Adding amazon-linux-kernel@amazon.com
On 9/7/17, 11:22 AM, "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> wrote:
Hi XFS mailing list,
Recently we received a bug report in the XFS filesystem with 'discard' option. I have been able to reproduce this issue. I used XFS filesystem to format NVMe SSD and mounted with 'discard' option. When I tried to delete the test fio files, the session took long time. This issue is based on Linux 4.9 stable tree. I have also repeated this test with Linux 4.13, 4.12, and we are facing the same issue. Tests were repeated several times and it was consistent.
Please see details below.
1. Kernel version: Linux ip-172-31-6-243 4.9.32-15.41.amzn1.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 22 06:20:54 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt with Ctrl+C
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
--> The session hangs and in 'blocked' state
$ dmesg
...
[ 492.329896] INFO: task rm:9231 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
...
Then I tried to backport some patches and repeated the test. The issue has been improved. Eventually 'rm' command completed but took long time(2min).
* Backported patch: 4560e78 xfs: don't block the log commit handler for discards
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt with Ctrl+C
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 2m2.242s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m25.524s
2. With Linux 4.12 and 4.13.0-rc1, the issue has been improved and the command is not stuck. But 'rm' command still takes long time (more than 1min). Please see details below.
Kernel version: Linux version 4.13.0-rc1+ (ec2-user@ip-172-31-21-25) (gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-9) (GCC)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 21 17:31:06 UTC 2017
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt at about 37%
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 1m57.912s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m28.810s
Compare this result with:
a) XFS mounted with 'nodiscard' option: It took less than 1min to run 'rm' command.
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt at about 39%
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 0m31.176s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m30.005s
b) EXT4 file system mounted with 'discard' option: It only took about several seconds to run 'rm' command.
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt at about 36.2%
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 0m4.661s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m4.657s
Please note if I wait for 'fio' command 100% done, 'rm' command took less than 1s (0m0.001s).
3. Shell script which triggers the problem
sudo su -
yum install xfsprogs fio -y
mkfs.xfs -K -f -s size=4096 /dev/nvme0n1
mkdir -p /media/disk1
mount -o discard /dev/nvme0n1 /media/disk1
cd /media/disk1/
fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
# Interrupt with Ctrl+C
time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
Best Regards,
Qian Lu
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hao Chen <haochen@amazon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-09 01:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <unASJ-5pn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1729097 |
This is expected. To get a better performance of XFS on NVMe drive, it is advised not use use the realtime discard option. https://www.intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/ssdc/data-center-ssds/Intel_Linux_NVMe_Guide_330602-002.pdf Hao ==== Lu, Qian <luqia@amazon.com> [2017-09-08 17:17:07 +0000] ==== > Adding amazon-linux-kernel@amazon.com > > On 9/7/17, 11:22 AM, "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> wrote: > > Hi XFS mailing list, > > Recently we received a bug report in the XFS filesystem with 'discard' option. I have been able to reproduce this issue. I used XFS filesystem to format NVMe SSD and mounted with 'discard' option. When I tried to delete the test fio files, the session took long time. This issue is based on Linux 4.9 stable tree. I have also repeated this test with Linux 4.13, 4.12, and we are facing the same issue. Tests were repeated several times and it was consistent. > > Please see details below. > > 1. Kernel version: Linux ip-172-31-6-243 4.9.32-15.41.amzn1.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 22 06:20:54 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting > --> Interrupt with Ctrl+C > # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* > --> The session hangs and in 'blocked' state > $ dmesg > ... > [ 492.329896] INFO: task rm:9231 blocked for more than 120 seconds. > ... > > Then I tried to backport some patches and repeated the test. The issue has been improved. Eventually 'rm' command completed but took long time(2min). > > * Backported patch: 4560e78 xfs: don't block the log commit handler for discards > > # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting > --> Interrupt with Ctrl+C > # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* > real 2m2.242s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m25.524s > > > 2. With Linux 4.12 and 4.13.0-rc1, the issue has been improved and the command is not stuck. But 'rm' command still takes long time (more than 1min). Please see details below. > > Kernel version: Linux version 4.13.0-rc1+ (ec2-user@ip-172-31-21-25) (gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-9) (GCC)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 21 17:31:06 UTC 2017 > > # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting > --> Interrupt at about 37% > # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* > real 1m57.912s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m28.810s > > Compare this result with: > a) XFS mounted with 'nodiscard' option: It took less than 1min to run 'rm' command. > > # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting > --> Interrupt at about 39% > # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* > real 0m31.176s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m30.005s > > b) EXT4 file system mounted with 'discard' option: It only took about several seconds to run 'rm' command. > > # fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting > --> Interrupt at about 36.2% > # time rm -rf fio_test_file.* > real 0m4.661s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m4.657s > > Please note if I wait for 'fio' command 100% done, 'rm' command took less than 1s (0m0.001s). > > > 3. Shell script which triggers the problem > > sudo su - > yum install xfsprogs fio -y > mkfs.xfs -K -f -s size=4096 /dev/nvme0n1 > mkdir -p /media/disk1 > mount -o discard /dev/nvme0n1 /media/disk1 > cd /media/disk1/ > fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting > # Interrupt with Ctrl+C > time rm -rf fio_test_file.* > > > Best Regards, > Qian Lu > > > > -- Hao Chen Cordite SDM@Cupertino 408-480-6632
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web