Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1725722 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-03 20:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-06 05:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-09-03 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-09-06 05:30 +0200
| From | Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-03 20:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples |
| Message-ID | <ulHOF-3lK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64. Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial bit. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/7/417 Joel Fernandes (4): samples/bpf: Use getppid instead of getpgrp for array map stress samples/bpf: Enable cross compiler support samples/bpf: Fix pt_regs issues when cross-compiling samples/bpf: Add documentation on cross compilation samples/bpf/Makefile | 7 +++- samples/bpf/README.rst | 10 ++++++ samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c | 2 +- samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> CC: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> -- 2.14.1.581.gf28d330327-goog
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-06 05:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <umzcm-3Pq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725722 |
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64. > Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further > discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in > the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial > bit. All patches in this set look good to me. When you repost without changes after net-next reopens pls keep my: Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-06 05:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <umzcm-3Pq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1727136 |
Hi Alexei, On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: >> These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64. >> Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further >> discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in >> the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial >> bit. > > All patches in this set look good to me. > When you repost without changes after net-next reopens pls keep my: > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Thanks a lot! will do. Regards, Joel
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web